Category Archives: Wonder Woman

Rebooting everything that isn’t nailed down: John Byrne’s Wonder Woman, Year Three

One of the things I dislike most about John Byrne is his obsession with continuity. This is a common trait with comics writers: they’re forever trying to straighten out some inconsistency or rewriting around a canonical detail they don’t like. Byrne, however, can be particularly single-minded. His oft-expressed view is that nobody understands a character like the creator, therefore every change by later writers hurts the character and should be thrown out. He throws them out with an almost vicious dedication

(Byrne never had any trouble, however, overriding the original concept to suit himself. Roy Thomas wrote the Vision as a synthetic living being capable of feeling, however much he hid it; Byrne insisted Vizh had no more feelings than a blender and as part of ending Wanda and the Vision’s marriage, made the Vision a machine that could be disassembled. To give one example).

That’s the dominant theme of Byrne’s last year on Wonder Woman, rebooting Donna Troy, the Golden Age Wonder Woman and the Demon. It explains why I thought of his entire run on WW as “continuity porn” as the phrase goes.The 1990s were a big time for killing/disabling superheroes and installing replacements: Death of Superman, Knightfall and others. William Messner-Loebs had already had Diana replaced as Wonder Woman but hadn’t killed her; Byrne killed Diana at the end of his second year, then had her mother Hippolyta step in as the new Wonder Woman. Diana went up to become the Goddess of Truth among the Olympians until she learned the Olympians planned to re-establish dominion over the mortal world. She objected and Zeus was about to smite her hard when Ares sticks up for her as the God of War’s granddaughter, him being Hippolyta’s pop and all.

?????? This comes completely out of the blue (and is hardly anything either William Marston or George Perez would have imagined for an origin) and is probably passed over. I wonder if Byrne was imitating a similar out-of-the-blue claim by Mars during Diana’s depowered years but I have no clue. In any case, Zeus sends Diana back to the mortal world as the Goddess of Truth, a status she lost a couple of writers later. This arc has a lot of pointless retconning to explain why the Olympians have different names under Rome. Because you know, what comics reader hasn’t been haunted by that profound question?Hippolyta as Wonder Woman leads into a plotline in which she travels back to WW II with Jay Garrick to battle the demoness Dark Angel, now allied with Hitler. “Polly” and the JSA win and Hippolyta opts to stay in WW II, thereby giving DC a Golden Age Wonder Woman again (the shapeshifting transparent thingumajig Diana acquired in a previous Byrne arc now becomes the classic invisible jet). This is one of Byrne’s better reboot ideas — I don’t feel it was necessary (Roy Thomas put a lot of work in to plug the gap left by the Golden Age Amazing Amazon being retconned out) but it works.This led into a new retcon revolving around Donna Troy. It turns out some of her recent tragedies — the death of her ex-husband and child — are the work of Dark Angel. Donna, an orphan rescued by Wonder Woman and adopted by the Amazon — an origin was later reworked to deal with the Perez reboot having WW show up after Wonder Girl — is really a doppelganger of Diana created so she’d have another child to play with on Themyscira. Dark Angel, misreading the doppelganger as Hippolyta’s daughter, has been tormenting her ever since, plunging her into one life after another, always making them miserable or tragic. Now, though, Wonder Woman and Hippolyta finally defeat Dark Angel and stabilize Donna’s existence, also restoring some of the powers she’d lost over the course of rebooting.

This feels like a work-around by Byrne to get back to the Silver Age concept of Donna as Wonder Woman’s sister. It doesn’t simplify continuity though — hers is still complicated — and if the goal was to regain her super-powers there were simpler ways to go about it. Still, it ain’t too bad.

The third reboot of this era, though, is just Byrne being Byrne. Back in the 1970s, Jack Kirby introduced Etrigan the Demon, bound by Merlin to fight against the forces of evil, while also giving him a human identity as Jason Blood. It was a mix of fun tales and forgettable, certainly not up to Kirby’s best. In 1987, Matt gave Etrigan a different origin and backstory in a Demon miniseries that led to new open-ended series that ran three times what Kirby’s did. Byrne devoted an astonishing amount of space to retconning out the reboot and getting Etrigan back to the Kirby version. I know Kirby’s a genius but sorry, Wagner’s take was an improvement. The reboot was a complete waste of space.

Overall, Byrne’s Wonder Woman tenure wasn’t as bad as I remembered but it wasn’t particularly good. But now we’re entering new territory for me as for whatever reason I stopped reading for the next few years. I’ll report on it when I’m another year or so in.

#SFWApro. Wonder Woman covers by Byrne, Demon by Kirby, all rights remain with current holders.

Leave a comment

Filed under Comics, Reading, Wonder Woman

Wonder Woman meets Hercules and Goes to Hell! John Byrne Year Two

The first year of John Byrne’s three-year run on Wonder Woman was, as I’ve said, better than I expected. The second year is also better than I remembered but I don’t think it’s good — way more bland than Byrne’s reboot of Superman and way, way below his X-Men work with Claremont (much as they got on each other’s nerves, they really brought out the best in each other’s talents).

His first story arc is a four-issue reworking of an old Hawkman story, “The Men Who Moved the World.” The story involves an ancient civilization buried under the Antarctic ice as conditions on Earth have changed; they want to change it back so their city can live again. Hawkman resolved that in one issue. Wonder Woman takes four. While I like the ending resolution relying on common sense and negotiation rather than fisticuffs, it’s not a threat that needed to take that long.

It’s significant because the civilization gives Wonder Woman a shapeshifting, transparent device that can shape itself in response to her mental commands. For example, becoming an invisible jet, just like the pre-Crisis WW had. This seems like a pointless retcon but I think it’s a sign of what Byrne had planned for his third year.

Second, we meet the Champion, AKA Harold Campion, a Gateway City millionaire who gets involved in the fight and proclaims his intent to make Wonder Woman his. She finds herself falling under his spell, an aspect that gets dropped without explanation. It turns out he’s Hercules, taking mortal form to get revenge on the Amazons for his centuries of imprisonment under Paradise Island (something we learned about during George Perez’s War of the Gods arc). However he realizes he was being a dick and apologizes for his intent to seduce and humiliate Hippolyta’s daughter.

Then comes a pointless two-parter bringing back the Cheetah and — typical for Byrne’s passion for retcons — pushing her back towards villainy after William Messner-Loebs made the effort to reform her. However this begins a new plotline which involves Wonder Woman turning back to clay. Trying to figure it out she talks through her life to this point, leading to an uninspired 10th anniversary issue (cover above) which rehashes the post-Crisis stories.

It soon becomes clear that with the Olympians departing from the mortal world, all the Amazons are turning into clay. Investigating eventually leads Donna and the resurrected Artemis into hell for a battle with the demon prince Neron. This gives Byrne another chance at a retcon: Artemis didn’t just win the Wonder Woman title because Hippolyta rigged the contest but because Hippolyta also transferred some of Diana’s power to Artemis. Apparently having Artemis even close to being a match for Diana was too much for Byrne to take.

Unfortunately the power-stealing is still in operation so things don’t go well in Hell, culminating with Wonder Woman getting a lethal blast of eldritch energy. Despite the best efforts of the Justice League and demonologist Jason Blood, it appears the second year will end with the Amazing Amazon dead. Say it ain’t so, Joe — er, John!

I’ll be back hopefully next week with the resolution.

#SFWApro. Covers by Joe Kubert, George Perez and Jose L. Garcia-Lopez, all rights remain with current holders

1 Comment

Filed under Reading, Wonder Woman

“Song of the Dead? It doesn’t make sense.” Artemis: Requiem

William Messner-Loebs wrapped up his run on Wonder Woman by introducing Artemis, a Bana-Mighdall Amazon (a Mideastern group that splintered off the Themiscyrans) who replaced Diana as Wonder Woman. It turned out that this was an elaborate ruse by Hippolyta, who had visions Wonder Woman would die: if that was so, it wouldn’t be her daughter! The visions came true — Artemis died — but almost a year later, she returned.

ARTEMIS: REQUIEM by Messner-Loebs and Ed Benes opens with Diana having nightmares of Artemis’ soul in Hell rather than in the Elysian Fields. Wonder Woman of course sets off to rescue her frenemy only to discover Artemis is doing reasonably well: she’s become the wife of Dalkrig-Hath, a high-ranking demon prince, also serving as one of his generals. It’s a lux life and she has no desire to leave it … but dammit, Diana came to hell to save her! As in his WW run, Messner-Loebs makes the cliche of the superhero inspiring good in others work. The end result is Artemis returns to life on the mortal world.

Her emergence from a graveyard proves an unwelcome surprise to the Hellenders, a team of demon-fighting superheroes organized by the enigmatic occult expert Nathaniel. Although she helps the Hellenders on their mission, Nathaniel is unimpressed — until she points out that his right-hand woman is a demon (“Tell me more about this screening procedure.”).

Artemis takes the codename Requiem, to Nathaniel’s annoyance (“Song of the dead? It doesn’t make sense.”) and proceeds using her fighting prowess and her intimate knowledge of Hell for the benefit of the cause. In the final issue they take the battle to Dalkrig-Hath — he wants his woman back, if only to punish her for leaving — and get involved in Hell’s internal power struggles before returning home.

As you can see from the first-issue cover, Benes’ art suffered from the 1990s boobs-and-butt visuals. Nevertheless it’s a solid six issue run with Messner-Loebs’ trademark humor, albeit often black humor. In one issue Artemis goes on a tabloid TV show to be interviewed alongside a demon … who turns out to be a metahuman actor who uses his shapeshifting power to provide tabloid hosts with whatever they need (“Tomorrow I’ll be an irresponsibly pregnant Hispanic teenager — it’s really no different from playing Hamlet except the pay’s better.”).In the final issue we learn Dalkrig-Hath’s magic phrase is “Mip mip kazoo.” Artemis explains that at his level of power, anything can be a magic phrase — he just thinks it’s funny to choose a silly one. That’s the kind of magic system I enjoy reading about.

Artemis subsequently appeared in John Byrne’s Wonder Woman run , which I’ve almost finished, so the review will come soon.

#SFWApro. Wonder Woman cover by Brian Bolland, Artemis covers by Benes.

1 Comment

Filed under Wonder Woman

Wonder Woman will someday have a daughter!

So DC has announced that for Wonder Woman #800 writer Tom King and artist Daniel Sampiere will jump us twenty years into the future to meet Trinity, who partners with Damien Wayne and Jonathan Kent, now grown-up as the new Batman and Superman (I gather). Together they form the new incarnation of the Wonder Woman/Batman/Superman “trinity,” though Trin’s battle name comes from carrying three lassos with different magical powers. Her real name is Elizabeth Marston Prince, a hat tip to WW-creator William Marston’s wife, who had a big influence on the series.Even though I don’t like most of King’s writing he’s done well on Human Target and Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow so who knows, maybe lightning will strike again. But this set up still bugs me, putting me in mind of Tim Hanley’s observation that no matter how much DC emphasizes Wonder Woman as the third leg of the trinity, she hasn’t had comparable comics success in a long time, nor has she had as many iconic stories as the two guys.

Years before Damien became part of the comics, he was conceived in the graphic novel Son of the Demon. Superman married Lois, then eventually they got a kid. Wonder Woman’s daughter, by contrast, comes out of nowhere, other than an appearance IIRC as an alt.universe character in the DC series Trinity some years back. We don’t know who her father is, we don’t see Diana as a parent; her father’s identity is a mystery the series will explore.

So perhaps what’s bugging me is that Diana’s never had the kind of stories that could lead smoothly into her having a kid. Or that because she’s the iconic female comics character, writers have had trouble writing her love life since the George Perez reboot. Think how much harder it would be writing her bringing up a kid, given all the sexist stereotypes to avoid, and all the flak a woman, even in fiction, can get for being a working mom.

By contrast, Lyta Trevor, daughter of the Earth-Two Wonder Woman, felt perfectly grounded when she appeared in Wonder Woman #300. The Earth-Two Diana had married Steve Trevor, they’d had a kid, no big. But she wasn’t the star of her own series.

None of which is a claim Trinity’s a bad character or that this is an inherently bad idea. But it still bugs me.

#SFWApro. Upper (I believe) by Sampiere, lower by Perez, all rights remain with current holder.

Leave a comment

Filed under Comics, Reading, Wonder Woman

Wonder Woman, classic stories and misogyny

As I said Sunday, Tim Hanley’s book on Wonder Woman disappointed me but it had enough interesting points to be worth reading. One of the things he brings up is that while DC now counts Wonder Woman as part of the “trinity” along with Superman and Batman she’s never had a landmark story to compare to theirs.

It’s not that the Masked Manhunter and the Caped Crusader have been consistently better written. I don’t think any fan of either man would disagree that both have suffered long stretches of crap, though we might disagree where the bad times lay. Batman’s freak transformations——and lots of Silver Age Superman are forgettable. I find much of 21st century Batman unreadable. Even so, they do have stories that get ranked among the greats: The Dark Knight Returns, The Death of Superman, Batman’s early battles with R’as al Ghul — they’re all considered classics.Heck, that cover image alone is classic.

Wonder Woman doesn’t have any stories that get the same regard. Ironically I think the depowered years at the dawn of the 1970s get referenced more than any other period, maybe simply because it’s such a contrast to the regular Wonder Woman image. George Perez’ opening six-issue arc is excellent but perhaps because it’s specifically intended to set up the series, it doesn’t press the same buttons. John Byrne’s run has been enjoyable but hardly redefines Diana the way he did Superman. William Messner-Loebs had Diana replaced as Wonder Woman by another Amazon, just like Superman and Batman were replaced, but it barely seems to have registered (keep in mind this is my subjective observations, not based on studying marketing or sales reports) with people who weren’t fans already. Of course the art of that era was way 1990s in its emphasis on boobs and butts so that may be a factor.

Is there something fundamental about WW that keeps the creative teams from hitting it out of the ballpark? Is it simply harder to work with an iconic woman character because there are so few of them? Or because Diana’s role as champion of women’s rights (not something she’s been consistently, I admit) make it hard to handle her? Is that she’s simply too low on people’s radar for her stories to become landmarks? Or is it that most characters don’t have a Dark Knight Returns-classic in their history — I don’t think Green Lantern, Flash, Thor or Iron Man do? I have no definite answers on this point, only questions.

Another point Hanley makes several times is that starting in the Silver Age, DC has moved away from creator William Marston’s distinctive vision. This is true of most Golden Age heroes: Superman isn’t the brawling rough-neck and outlaw of the 1930s either. But I agree with Hanley that one thing they could keep is the idea that Amazon training can turn any woman into someone exceptional: Marston’s Wonder Woman is closer to Black Widow or Batman, the product of super-intensive training, than to Thor.

Another aspect I don’t think Hanley mentioned is that the idea of Diana fighting misogynists has also faded. The Golden Age Dr. Psycho was a vicious woman-hater horrified that women were getting jobs in the military industrial complex; the Perez reboot version is just a twisted psionic sadist. Marston’s Mars wasn’t simply opposed to Wonder Woman and the Amazons because they stand for peace; to him, women exist purely as slaves, to be taken as spoils of war. That hasn’t been part of his character in at least fifty years. Perez’ Circe debuts as Diana’s opposite number, sewing hate and distrust between men and women, but that aspect disappeared in her subsequent appearances.Would having WW take on real-world misogyny grab more attention? Sex trafficking, preachers who think women should submit to spousal abuse, the right to abortion, rape apologists — would tackling those topics in a superhero context make the series stronger? Could it be done without getting heavy-handed? Would DC have the stomach to try it? Too bad they didn’t try that around the time Green Lantern/Green Arrow was tackling serious issues —— but I doubt that occurred to anyone. Comic  books lagged behind on feminism much more than issues like civil rights. Heck, even in the 21st century, some writers think it’s cool to team up Wonder Woman with a sexist jerk.

In short, I doubt that’s the miracle solution to Wonder Woman’s blues. But I’d love to see them try it anyway.

#SFWApro. Cover images top to bottom by Sheldon Moldoff, Neal Adams, H.G. Peters, Brian Bolland and Adams again.

Leave a comment

Filed under Comics, Reading, Undead sexist cliches, Wonder Woman

A book about a hero, two disappointing books about superheroes

MARCH: Book Two by John Lewis, Andrew Aydin and Nate Powell picks up where V1 ended, with Lewis becoming active in the civil-rights movement. Here we see him trying to integrate movie audiences, participating in Freedom Rides (except for a fluke of chance, he’d have been on one bus that got firebombed by white bigots) and participating in the groundwork for the March on Washington. While the struggle is dramatic, I was more intrigued by the politics within the movement, from debates over nonviolence (was it a tactic or a moral principle?), to the widespread conviction the March would be nothing — feel-good speeches by government-selected stooges, what good could it do?

MARVEL COMICS: The Untold Story by Sean Howe traces Marvel’s history from pulp and men’s magazine publisher Martin Goodman deciding to dabble in comics through the lean pre-FF years (Goodman might have shut the line down but he’d seen the industry revive before) through the glory years beginning with Fantastic Four #1, the chaos of the Bronze Age with multiple inexperienced staffers as editors in chief through Jim Shooter’s era as micromanager and onward to the Disney era (surprisingly there’s relatively little on the movies, or Marvel’s earlier TV ventures).

As a comics nerd this is fascinating but the book is so full of errors I can spot I’m not sure how much I can trust it. Among other errors, Howe confuses the Serpent Society mercenaries with the white supremacist Sons of the Serpent, identifies Nick Fury’s infinity formula (an immortality drug) as a Silver Age invention (it was late 1970s) and he claims Batman’s New Look era was a campy attempt to copy Marvel’s style (it wasn’t — see the link for details). That’s sub-par editing by everyone involved.

WONDER WOMAN UNBOUND: The Curious History of the World’s Most Famous Heroine is the weakest of Tim Hanley’s books I’ve read so far. In fairness, that’s partly because I’ve read so much Wonder Woman and a fair amount about her so a lot of what Hanley has to say isn’t new. He does have some interesting material though, such as pointing out where anti-comics crusader Fredric Wertham made a case for Batman and Robin being a homoerotic fantasy for gay kids, he assumed flat out that Wonder Woman was lesbian, no proof needed (having read The Ten Cent Plague on anti-comics censorship, I think Hanley’s more generous to Wertham than the man deserved, however).

Hanley also discusses how Ms. Magazine‘s book on Wonder Woman plays up the aspects of William Marston’s original philosophy they liked (women can do anything!) and ignored the bondage and female-dominance elements. And he does have a point that the George Perez’ reboot ignores one of the best ideas in Marston, that any woman with Amazon training could become their match and at least in theory equal Wonder Woman.

I disagree, however, with a lot of his interpretations. When Diana tells Steve she can’t marry him until she’s wiped crime from the Earth, Hanley sees her as really, really wanting to quit her job and be her housewife; I hear “Steve, what we have is wonderful, I don’t feel like changing anything” (even when she’s jealous over Steve’s interest in others, she’s not bemoaning having to stay single). And Hanley’s dead wrong to argue Marvel in the late 1960s/early Bronze Age embraced feminism where DC was stuck in the 1950s: while I wouldn’t recommend DC comics of that era to anyone who wants great female representation, Marvel was definitely the weaker (I’ll come back to this point in detail another time). Hanley’s also off arguing that Marvel, with its superior characterization (something it did have, no argument) didn’t do the silly romantic triangles DC did; that requires ignoring Sub-Mariner/Invisible Girl/Reed Richards, Peter Parker/Betty Brant/Ned Leeds, Matt Murdock/Karen Page/Foggy Nelson and quite a few more. Howe’s book does a much better job nailing Marvel for sexism. However Hanley did touch on a couple of points I’ll discuss later this week.

#SFWApro. Covers by Jack Kirby and H.G. Peters, all rights remain with current holders.

6 Comments

Filed under Comics, Reading, Wonder Woman

Women protagonists I’ve encountered recently.

The WONDER WOMAN SILVER AGE OMNIBUS Volume 1 collects stories (by Robert Kanigher, Ross Andru and Mike Esposito) I already have, but in a large color format that makes them much more eye-catching. Just look at this sequence from Wonder Woman #114, after aliens suck parade balloons up into the air with their trucks attached —It is, as the watching bystanders say, one amazing stunt and it looks sooo much cooler in this format. The volume runs from “The Million Dollar Penny” which kicked off the Kanigher/Andru/Esposito team on the book through the story right before the Wonder Family era began. It also includes several sample letter columns, showing that yes, Wonder Girl really was popular with fans and that fans weren’t as knowledgeable back in the day — lots of questions about WW’s origins and who is that “Great Hera” person she swears by? Gale Simone’s introduction is fun, pointing out the strengths of this run, though she’s wrong to assert Wonder Woman is reluctant to kill — she has zero qualms about blowing up alien invaders or sinister foreign submarines. I’m looking forward to V2 later this year.

HOW TO BUILD A GIRL by Caitlin Moran worked better for me than I’d have expected as 1990s coming-of-age stories are hardly my thing. Nevertheless I really enjoyed the tale of Johanna, a British teenager in 1990s London reinvents herself as a hard-drinking, chain-smoking Goth rock reviewer with viciously snarky putdowns of bands that don’t measure up to her standards. Moran’s character style and first-person voice kept this fun but the pacing is off: so much time spent on the era Before Johanna takes action, then her stint in her new identity, then a sudden rush to finish, realize the moral (reinventing yourself shouldn’t mean becoming a shitty person!) and course-corrects. This may reflect that it’s the first in a series but it still lessened my enjoyment.

I was ambivalent about the return of SAGA after the “meh” previous volume but taking a break does seem to have recharged creators Brian Vaughn and Fiona Staples. With Marco gone, Mom is doing her best to keep her family going, even if it means shady dealings, while a variety of players still want her and little Hazel dead. Entertaining though if you can’t stomach gendered insults (the “c word” for women gets tossed around a lot) this ain’t for you. And while this series has never made any pretense it’s a realistic future culture, it still annoys me that suddenly the characters are tossing around “woke” as common slang which they never did before.

I KISSED SHARA WHEELER by Casey McQuiston has Chloe, a bisexual student at a conservative Christian Alabama high school, become obsessed with the disappearance of Shara, the principal’s perfect daughter and Chloe’s only rival for valedictorian (and the Most Obnoxious, Most Irritating Girl She Ever Met, so we know where this is going). That Shara’s leaving cryptic notes for Chloe and others doesn’t do anything to cool Chloe’s fixation. I enjoy McQuiston’s voice but Shara dropping her enigmatic clues came off a knock-off Batman villain ; I dropped out half-way through the book, skipped to the ending  and didn’t regret it. Keep in mind, though, I’m not the target audience so YMMV.

#SFWApro. Art by Andru and Esposito, book cover by Allison Reimold, all rights remain with current holders.

 

1 Comment

Filed under Reading, Wonder Woman

From Darkseid to Doomsday: John Byrne’s first year on Wonder Woman

As I mentioned when I wrapped up rereading William Messner-Loeb’s Wonder Woman run, I thought so little of John Byrne, who followed him on the title, I debated skipping it. But I have the DC app on my phone, it includes the Byrne years, so I thought hey, why not? I’m glad I did because Byrne does better as writer/penciler than I remembered, though I can see why I wasn’t thrilled either.

First off, there’s her hair, which looks like she’s overdosed on conditioner.Or here.It looks ridiculous, as if Byrne were swiping from Marvel’s Medusa. And while I normally don’t worry about the drawbacks of Diana’s shoulder-length hair in battle, this much hair reminds me of Foz Meadows’ critique of the perfect hair problem.

The second reason I took a dislike to the run is that it opens with the Amazons battling Darkseid and the forces of Apokalips. Darkseid is a great character but way overused — as Keith Giffen once said, DC editors pass Darkseid around like a bong — and most of the time not used well. He’s not used well here, where he could be almost any alien tyrant.

The first four issues have Darkseid attacking Themyscira because he wants to hunt down the Greek gods. Byrne’s Genesis crossover event revealed that all of Earth’s mythological gods were created as a side effect of the war in New Gods that destroyed the old gods; Jack Kirby thereby gets credit for created the Asgardians, the Olympians, the Tuatha de Danaan and so on. I found that a terrible idea and apparently so did George Perez, who specifically retcons it out. Here, Byrne retcons it back in. Even without that, this is a listless opening.

Things improve after that though. Diana moves to Gateway City — former base of operations for the Silver Age Hawkman and Hawkgirl — becomes friends with a local museum curator, meets the Phantom Stranger and the Demon and battles Morgan LeFay who hopes to steal Amazonian immortality. The final arc has her battling a clone of Doomsday, giving Byrne a chance to show Wonder Woman is truly in Superman’s league.

His depiction of Diana’s strength is easily the best thing in this. In one story she encounters crooks using a high-tech tank for a robbery; she grabs it with one hand, hefts it up and smashes it down without even breaking a sweat. I like that. Otherwise, while not as bad as I remembered, it’s more “readable” than “great,” definitely not up to Messner-Loebs or the best George Perez issues.

But having launched, I’ll stick with it, so more Byrne (and the spinoff Artemis: Requiem series from Messner-Loebs) before too long.

#SFWApro. All art by Byrne, rights remain with current holder.

2 Comments

Filed under Comics, Reading, Wonder Woman

She wants candy, baby: The many lives of Etta Candy

Next to Steve Trevor and Hippolyta, nobody has been a part of Wonder Woman’s adventures as much as Etta Candy. Unlike them, there have been huge stretches of the series where Etta disappeared from the cast and her portrayal has varied much more wildly through the years.

Etta shows up in Sensation Comics #2 as a student at Holliday College where she’s a leader in one of the sororities.  Wonder Woman’s engaged in a battle of wits with Doctor Poison (yes, the villain from the Gal Gadot movie) and needs to distract some Axis spies. She contacts the Holliday Girls and Etta leads them in distracting the villains. It’s no great sacrifice: the girls were always shown as happy to flirt with men.

My memories of Etta from the few Golden Age stories I’d read were mostly negative: William Marston and artist Harry G. Peter present her as a fat young woman constantly obsessing over Candy. Reading the Golden Age Wonder Woman Omnibus I discovered I was wrong. Yes, Etta’s a glutton constantly complaining about not having enough candy or losing it in a fight but she’s also daring, unflinching in the face of danger and extremely capable in a fight. She’s also a Texan heiress.Etta continues attending college and fighting alongside WW until 1950, then she vanishes. In 1960 she returns in Wonder Woman #117. She’s once again a college student (DC’s reference guide from the 1980s, Who’s Who quips that having stayed in college so long she’s clearly a genius who’s racked up multiple degrees) accompanied by three sorority friends: toy-loving Tina Toy, tiny Lita Little and tall Thelma Tall. They crop up in several more adventures but they’re just a cheerleading section for Diana rather than mixing it up with villains Golden Age-style. After four stories Robert Kanigher dropped them; even when he rebooted the series to tell Golden Age stories he didn’t include Etta.

That left her MIA until the Wonder Woman TV show included Etta Candy (Beatrice Colen) as a character but this time a corporal rather than a college girl. When DC followed the show’s first season and shifted the comic book to World War II (the Wonder Woman of Earth 2 if that means anything to you) they brought back Etta Candy too. Once again she was military, which became part of her character from that point on. She also got a subplot of her own involving a Frenchman romancing her for ulterior motives, but the WW II era wrapped up before we learned his agenda.

When the Earth-One Wonder Woman adopts a military secret identity again, Etta returned as a military member and new buddy for Diana Prince. Regrettably she wasn’t a fighter here either and her struggles with weight were probably her main characteristic (with Diana grumbling about how men in Man’s World are so shallow not to see past the surface).

Etta got better storylines in the George Perez reboot. Perez wrote her tougher and more capable, plus Steve was now a friend to Diana rather than a  boyfriend. That freed him up to start dating Etta. Perez planned to marry them off in his final issue but wires got crossed and he was told to hold it over for the next writer. Ironically William Messner-Loebs, who took over the book, didn’t get around to marrying them either.

Since DC’s New 52 reboot Etta has been rebooted to be both black and lesbian; with Steve back as Diana’s lover, Etta’s now dating Barbara Minerva, the Cheetah. I’m a few years behind on Wonder Woman so I’m not sure if any of that’s changed.

#SFWApro. Art by Peter, Peter again, Ross Andru and Perez. All rights to images remain with current holders.

Leave a comment

Filed under Comics, Reading, Wonder Woman

Steve Trevor, wonder man

I’m finally working my way through John Byrne’s Wonder Woman run and so far it’s not as bad as I remembered. However it’ll be a while before I have any posts on those issues so I thought I’d look at two of the three most important supporting characters in Wonder Woman’s world, Steve Trevor and Etta Candy. First up: Steve.

Steve Trevor was literally there from the first story, a backup feature in All-Star Comics #8 that preceded Diana’s series in Sensation Comics. Shot down over Paradise Island, he’s the first man Diana ever saw. She saves his life by developing new Amazon healing technology. Having fallen in love with him she opts to become Wonder Woman, travel with him to “Man’s World” and  fight injustice there (Robert Kanigher was one of several authors to drop the idea she’s only leaving her home out of love for a man). It’s a good origin though I don’t think it’s as classic as Batman’s or Spider-Man’s — and it’s retold way too often.

As Trina Robbins once put it, Steve was the Lois Lane of the series. He’s a military officer, brave and daring but his primary role is to get himself in trouble so Wonder Woman can come and save him. I’ve known fans who think he’s useless; others love him precisely because he’s willing to play second fiddle to a woman who’s stronger, braver and more heroic than he’ll ever be. As witness “The Lawbreaker’s League” in which a device makes Steve stronger than his sweetie; when WW says she could never be happy with a man who can dominate her physically Steve smashes it without a second thought.

In a later Kanigher story Steve tells Wonder Woman he’s such a screw-up he needs around full-time to save his life; she agrees that if she has to save him three times that day, she’ll marry him. That’s amusing but it’s also typical of Silver Age Steve, forever trying, like Lois, to trick Wonder Woman into marrying him. She’s Superman, determined to stay single; her duty to fight evil takes precedence. That’s cool but by the end of Kanigher’s run things got a lot more annoying, with Diana constantly mooning over Steve (Kanigher imported a lot of romance comics tropes) and Steve’s tricks getting creepier. In one issue he traps her in her lasso and forces her to go with him to a Justice of the Peace to get married. It doesn’t work but still!

Then came the radical reboot that depowered Wonder Woman and killed off Steve. After her powers returned, along with Kanigher, we had several stories showing Steve alive again, without explanation (as noted at the link, this brief period was a mess). It wasn’t until 1976 that the gods, and author Marty Pasko, resurrected Steve in #223 (yep, that’s him under the hood). It was an awkward resurrection: Steve took a new identity (Steve Howard) and felt much more frustrated at being WW’s Lois Lane. He’s arguing with her more, gets a new job as a spy and clearly Pasko had some ideas about their relationship … but then the Linda Carter series took off and we were back with Diana and Steve in WW II. When that was over and we returned to the present, new writer Jack C. Harris killed Steve again.

This time he stayed gone until 1980, when a parallel-world Steve Trevor crossed over to Earth-One and became Diana’s new/old love (she’d chosen to forget Steve to ease her pain so the relationship felt new). They stayed together until 1986 when they married right before Crisis on Infinite Earth erased them in favor of George Perez’ reboot.

Perez’ Steve was an older man, tough and smart and soon a friend and mentor to Diana, but never a lover; romance was, for better or worse, not a thing for her in the Perez years. Eventually they saw themselves as siblings, when Diana learned Steve’s mother had landed on Themyscira years earlier and died a hero, inspiring both Diana’s costume and Hippolyta’s choice of what to name her daughter. Steve did fall in love with Etta and Perez’ run was supposed to end with their wedding. Due to some confusion, after Perez had finished the issue he had to redraw it so new writer William Messner-Loebs could handle the wedding — but he never did, for whatever reason.

A few years ago, Greg Rucka finally paired off Steve and Diana again (Etta’s now gay) and I believe that’s still the status quo. However I’m not up on recent developments so don’t hold me too that.

#SFWApro. Covers by Edward Hibbard and Ernie Chan, all rights remain with current holders.

1 Comment

Filed under Reading, Wonder Woman