Faster Woody Allen — kill, kill!

Back in 2011, I began (re)watching all of Woody Allen’s movies, in order, starting with 1966’s What’s Up, Tiger Lily? For some arcane reason, a number of his 1990s films weren’t available unless I shelled out for a DVD. When I discovered 1997’s DECONSTRUCTING HARRY was available on Netflix, I plugged one gap. While Allen is a hideous human being — friend of Jeffrey Epstein, married to his former partner’s adoptive daughter, allegedly assaulted underage Dylan Farrow (I include “allegedly” not because I doubt it but I sometimes worry about saying something libelous) — I do like his movies. Not so much his 1990s output so I was surprised how much I liked this one.

Harry (Allen) is a brilliant (of course) writer with a penchant for mining his personal life for thinly veiled roman a clef stories, complete with versions of the people involved (including Billy Crystal as a romantic rival and Julia Louise-Dreyfuss and Amy Irving as past relationships). They’re recognizable enough that many of them are pissed about it; others are pissed that he’s been an uncontrollable lecher since his teenage years (“We don’t know if there’s a god, but there are women.”), never faithful and now in a snit that his very young ex Fay (Elizabeth Shue) is marrying someone else.

Why yes, it does seem to be a confession of sorts, though nothing Harry does as bad as the worst Allen’s been accused of. Then again, his comment about using writing to settle scores reminds me of the vindictive streak in some of his 21st century films such as Blue Jasmine and An Irrational Man. “Boy, you must really love onions.”

TURA (2024) is a documentary on Tura Satana, the mixed-race Asian American/Native American burlesque dancer turned actor who found fame with Faster Pussycat, Kill … Kill! This follows her from a gang rape when she was nine into burlesque, acting, martial arts, parenthood, revenge on her rapists (“Over the news few years she tracked them down and beat them to a pulp.”), a list of lovers include Forrest Tucker, Tony Bennett and Elvis Presley and then a late-in-life revival when her movies became big on videotape.

While Ms. Satana is a fascinating figure, the documentary is flawed. As one friend of mine pointed out online, you’d think Faster Pussycat was something in the spirit of Thelma and Louise when Satana’s character is a violent killer, more villain than anti-hero. There are other puzzles too — the film says Satana has no Japanese ancestry (her kids did a DNA checkup) but my friend says her Japanese/Filipino ancestry is well documented. Interesting but not definitive. “In our day men beat the fuck out of women — no woman beat the fuck out of men.”

All rights to images remain with current holders.


Leave a comment

Filed under Movies

Victory through air power! Or in this case, low-fat dog food

It appears Plush Dudley’s diarrhea drama is over.

Certainly it’s much reduced. He’s stopped pooping on the bed in the night and the accidents he did have this week were small before they dried up completely. It appears the root cause was pancreatitis reacting to too much fat in his diet — so from now on, it’s low fat diet for Plush Dudley. Cheerio, veggies, low fat kibble, low fat soft food (we’d already bought some for Trixie for similar reasons). And rice mixed in with soft food to help firm up his stool. Fortunately Plushie’s perfectly happy to eat Cheerios and vegetable chunks (and rice) so we don’t have to deny him treats.

On the plus side, he’s been so lively this week, it’s been amazing. Even before the problem went away, he was bounding around, wrestling with Trixie, walking with a bounce in his step. Possibly he’s feeling better than he has in a while. Also possibly, losing around four pounds has made him lighter and his joints less strained — lord knows I’d have a lot less bulk to move if I lost 20 percent of my body mass.

Dealing with diarrhea the first couple of days was demanding, especially as TYG had some stuff of her on she needed to get done. While I miss the weekly payments from The Local Reporter I would have gotten nothing of my own stuff done this week if I’d been covering Carrboro. I applied for a couple of telecommuting reporting gigs I found online, no answer yet. I’ll keep applying. Much as I like writing fiction, I also like bringing in money.

As to my own work, I got another 8,000 words on the second draft of Let No Man Put Asunder. So far it’s proceeding smoothly and I like my output. I also started two new stories when I wasn’t quite ready to do more on Asunder. Good Morning Starshine is a rewrite of a novel I wrote the first draft of years ago, then never got back to. Recently I’ve been trying without success, due to being unable to figure out the protagonist’s character. I’m not sure I’ve figured it out yet, but he does have a character and I’m forging forward with the strange story of a hippy heading to San Francisco for the Summer of Love, then finding she’s in 1987. Labyrinth of Books involves a disgruntled grad student stumbling into a strange bookstore with an even stranger salesclerk. I have no idea where this goes from there, though I did get past the part I’d plotted out in my head.

I also tackled the usual range of chores including taking the car in for a tire replacement and paying our vehicle registration online. Over at Atomic Junkshop I looked at what Marvel Comics publishes in the Marvel Universe

— and at that mainstay of Silver Age Superman, the “imaginary” story.

I do hope the IRL demands on me and TYG ease up a little in April. Still, this wasn’t a bad week of writing given what I had to overcome.

Oh, and one cool thing: with Project Hail Mary in theaters, that Christian Science Monitor article quoting me about aliens is now live. I’m only one of the experts quoted — given how long the interview ran, I’m surprised Stephen Humphries didn’t use more (I guess when you work for a major newspaper, you can take the time). Still, that’s way cool.

Covers by Jack Kirby (top) and Carmine Infantino (bottom), all rights remain with current holders.

Leave a comment

Filed under Short Stories, Southern Discomfort, Story Problems, The Dog Ate My Homework, Time management and goals, Writing

Odd things in our neck of the woods

This one was from last Halloween.

This one’s just there.

Leave a comment

Filed under Miscellanea

It’s foolish to write about Iran in advance

Heck, on Monday alone, we had the Toddler President declare Iran was negotiating peace, then Iran replied no, they weren’t. However I rarely write my posts the day they go live, so here we go. Fortunately these are less current updates than links to deeper insights.

Commenting on the Toddler’s lies about negotiating, Cheryl Rofer says “The best explanation for the words that drop from Trump’s mouth is that he tries things out to see what the marks will pick up. It’s not lying or fantasizing, but there’s not a simple word for it. I know that “bullshit” has been suggested in a specialized meaning, but the normal use interferes. It’s complicated by his need to always win, always humiliate his opponents. There is probably an element of fantasizing, but how he is perceived by others is also an important factor.”

People are betting on the progress of the war. They’ve threatened one journalist for refusing to change a story about a missile hitting Israel.

The Necrotic Toddler running this country has been talking about dead people walking around without legs. We have minesweepers we could use in the Straits; he and SecWar Hegseth didn’t think to put them in position before the war started.

“He told Welker how little he really cares about gas prices. Since this war started, gas has gone from $2.94 a gallon to $3.66. That’s a 72-cent jump in two weeks. People are already feeling it at the pump and growing increasingly concerned about how high it will go and how they will be able to cover the increasing costs. And when Welker asked Trump directly whether rising gas prices could hurt Republicans in the midterms, he said, “I’m not concerned at all.” He added, “There’s so much oil, gas, there’s so much out there, but you know, it’s being clogged up a little bit. It’ll be unclogged very soon.”

Related to the above: “Iranian attacks ‌have knocked out 17% of Qatar’s liquefied natural gas (LNG) export capacity, causing an estimated $20 billion in lost annual revenue and threatening supplies to Europe and Asia, QatarEnergy’s CEO and state minister for energy affairs told Reuters on Thursday.” But never mind, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum is celebrating the Toddler’s ongoing effort to eliminate alternative energy in this country — “the era of affordable, reliable and secure energy is here to stay.” This is not only a lie, it’s a stupid lie. All their lies are because they have no way to grapple with reality.

“What we are seeing in just the first few days of the US bombing of Iran is no normal fog of war. It is unprecedented I would argue. We have seen arguably the worst friendly fire incident in modern US history, the worst articulations of war aims, the worst economic/industrial preparations for a war, and, tragically, what might very well be amongst the worst war crimes in US history. To have just one of these things in at the start of the war would be a failure, to have all of them….”

“This isn’t a case of oderint dum metuant — let them hate so long as they fear. Instead, the world increasingly holds America in contempt.” As witness Iranian officials declaring “Someone like us will never come to terms with someone like you.”

““It is not the intelligence community’s responsibility to determine what is and is not an imminent threat,” — Tulsi Gabbard, US intelligence head, trying to avoid saying anything that would upset the Toddler. Spoiler: yes, it is their responsibility.

Cheryl Rofer, who has some knowledge of nuclear issues, says attempting to recover Iran’s nuclear material would be a bad idea.

We already know Russia has a big influence on Putin’s Poodle. Paul Krugman points out how much influence petrostates such as Saudi Arabia have on policies from embracing fossil fuels to attacking Iran. “Why does Gulf oil money play an outsized role in U.S. corruption? Because petrostates, unlike advanced democracies, combine vast wealth with secrecy and a complete blurring of the lines between public office and private gain. So they’re better placed than anyone else to line U.S. officials’ pockets.”

Ukraine is offering us support with its expertise in drone warfare. Nevertheless Hegseth says we wouldn’t run out of munitions except Biden sent them all to the Ukraine. Hegseth also keeps on blaming the media for not gushing enough.

“For the moment the point is: Trump and Hegseth exult in seeing things blow up, as in a video game, and crowing like teenagers because they’ve “won.” That is not how this story is likely to end.”

“[Trump] also said that “Iran wants to make a deal,” but he has declined “because the terms aren’t good enough yet.” Today Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said Tehran had not even asked for negotiations, let alone a ceasefire.”

Anyone who thinks we’re on the side of right in fighting for Iran — well, they’re probably happy we’re also embracing Hungarian dictator Viktor Orban.

“Nine former members of the bureau told Kramer it seems clear the administration did not prepare for a global oil crisis. Trump’s claim that “nobody expected” Iran to hit other countries in the Middle East supports their statement because, as they told Kramer, previous administrations planned for exactly that scenario.”

“Not only was the Bush administration exploiting an actual security threat, always better campaigners than governors they also engaged in an all-hands-on-deck propaganda campaign, having a popular president as the front man. Trump has none of this going for him, and it shows” — Scott Lemieux on how W’s White House built support for the Iraq invasion.

Republicans also seem to think they can punch down at Muslims as freely as the W administration did. And they’re repeating familiar bullshit claims about how they’re saving us from Sharia law.

That said, “The men who want to Make America Great Again are searching for a clean break from the Global War on Terror. That conflict was launched with lofty rhetoric about democracy and freedom but led to years of civil war, chaos, swollen ranks of terror groups, genocide, a refugee crisis and, in Afghanistan, a complete, humiliating failure. What these men don’t seem to realize, or care about, is that their language of brute force represents a fundamental break with American traditions around war going back to the Revolution.

“Boastful talk about slaughter is as old as war itself. “The wheels of my war chariot,” bragged one Assyrian king, “were bespattered with filth and blood. With the bodies of their warriors, I filled the plain, like grass.” But America’s founders asserted universal principles that should make such an attitude unthinkable. If you believe not only that all men are created equal but also that governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, then war cannot be justified as a pure display of power and dominance.

In his addresses to the troops, George Washington would bring up the imagery of violence not as a spectacle to be enjoyed but as horrors to be endured — from “mercenary hirelings fighting in the cause of lawless ambition, rapine and devastation” to those who wished to keep revolutionary America in “bondage and misery.” And when news of British atrocities reached him, Washington wrote that “their wanton cruelty injures rather than benefits their cause; that, with our forbearance, justly secures to us the attachment of all good men.”

Given the Toddler and his party have shown themselves incapable of admitting defeat or course correcting, this will not go well, nor end well. Though of course the Toddler may not grasp this because his toadies’ job includes shielding him from reality, for example “briefing” him with a montage of shit blowing up (“the videos are also driving Trump’s increasing frustration with news coverage of the war. Trump has pointed to the success depicted in the daily videos to privately question why his administration can’t better influence the public narrative, asking aides why the news media doesn’t emphasize what he’s seeing, one of the current U.S. officials and the former U.S. official said.”). And we have Alan Dershowitz — friend of Jeffrey Epstein, ardent Toddler toady — declaring that just as the Toddler is saving us from Iran, he would have stopped the Holocaust. No, he wouldn’t.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

Jeffrey Epstein is dead. He’s still being talked about

“It appears Epstein was involved in criminal activity that went way beyond pedophilia and sex trafficking, which makes it even more outrageous that [Attorney General] Pam Bondi is sitting on several million unreleased files.”

Jeffrey Epstein talked a lot about pizza. That doesn’t mean pizzagate was real.

“Epstein argues that teaching children to write may be harmful because writing forces “linear” and “narrow” patterns of thinking, whereas the greatest thinkers never wrote.”

“Billionaires really like thinkers who see their exploitation of the weak as a good and natural thing.” — from a look at how Epstein came to influence the Edge intellectual conclave.

Edge member Stephen Pinker offers what he considers controversial ideas: “Do most victims of sexual abuse suffer no lifelong damage … Do men have an innate tendency to rape … Are Ashkenazi Jews, on average, smarter than gentiles because their ancestors were selected for the shrewdness needed in  money lending?” Got to say, I’ve never found ideas like these to be cutting edge (the rape thing, for instance, is bullshit) but I can see why a bunch of older white men might find them appealing.

“Rep. James Comer, chair of the House Oversight Committee, has claimed that the Department of Justice intervened to block a state investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s New Mexico ranch in 2019.”

“The Justice Department has withheld some Epstein files related to allegations that President Trump sexually abused a minor, an NPR investigation finds. It also removed some documents from the public database where accusations against Jeffrey Epstein also mention Trump.”

“Democratic members of the Republican-led House Oversight Committee told reporters that Bondi, who was joined by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, would not commit to complying with the subpoena for her sworn testimony April 14 to answer questions about the Justice Department’s handling of records related to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.”

“The 2014 visit to Newport was not the first time Epstein tried to get his “girls” onto a Woody Allen set. Emails from the latest DOJ document release show that between 2010 and 2017, he attempted to influence or aid Allen’s casting process.”

How predators like Epstein can manipulate their victims into believing they have agency.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics, Undead sexist cliches

A cover that probably looks very strange in 2026

This Tom Dunn cover captures an era when women working in Washington way outstripped the number of available men. This was a thing in WW I; I don’t know if it was true when this book came out in hardback in 1951.

This is one of those covers that looks a little strange in every era. Artist is uncredited.

All rights to images remain with current holders.

Leave a comment

Filed under cover art, Reading

Artificial intelligence, writing and cooking

The publishing company Hachette announced last week it was pulling Shy Girl by Mia Ballard because it had been flagged as possibly AI-written. Ballard’s defense is that she wrote it herself, then “an acquaintance she hired to edit the self-published version of the novel had used A.I.”

This reminds me of the occasional cop-out that “it wasn’t me, it was my ghostwriter!” After televangelist Pat Robertson wrote the viciously anti-semitic New World Order (the Illuminati composed of international Jewish bankers are gaining control of the United States!) one of his associates told a reporter that it wasn’t Robertson at fault — he has the book’s ghost-written. Which I can believe. However if it’s Robertson’s name on the book (or Hilary Clinton’s, or Jeff Bezos, or whoever’s), he owns it. Period. I’m also quite sure if a ghostwriter had put anything in print that Robertson genuinely objected to — endorsement of gay rights or feminism, say — it would not have seen the light of day.

According to Shy Girl readers the book’s AI tells include “generic and confusing metaphors and repetitive phrasing.” If that was the work of Ballard’s editor, why didn’t she notice? Did she accept them without thinking? Did she think they were an improvement? No way does she come out of this looking good.

Stepping away from that specific case, I’m reminded of a book I read some years back, Laura Shapiro’s Something From the Oven. It’s a food history that recounts how starting in the 1950s, the food industry embraced the idea that cooking was becoming passé. Why would anyone want to put in the work or endure the kitchen mess when modern science had supplanted cooking. All you needed was a condensed soup in a can. Or dehydrated meals. Or frozen meals. Or TV dinners. Or microwavable meals. A lot of food kit advertising falls into this vein.

The death of cooking would have worked out great for the industry: more processed is more profitable. Instead, people kept cooking. Today it’s perfectly possible to eat healthy without ever cooking (expensive, but possible): frozen meals, food kids, DoorDash to deliver from restaurants. People still cook. A lot of people enjoy it.

That’s not a putdown of people who use short cuts. I use occasional microwave meals and I buy bread in between baking sessions. I have recipes for veggie burgers but why bother when there are perfectly good premade veggie burgers? The rest of the time I cook because I enjoy it. Yes it’s more work but that’s part of the satisfaction. It’s fun and rewarding.

AI companies want us to believe that writing is a burden. Why not employ their LLMs, then we can take the effort off our shoulders? It’s just like when society replaced the horse-and-buggy with the car — free the human horses! Except we are not horses tied to a wagon against our will; it’s more akin to people who choose to run marathons. Yes, it’s less exertion or strain to get in a car; doing it easy isn’t the point. The challenge is part of the fun. Miranda Yaver makes a similar point.

The food industry was never able to kill cooking. Convenience food wound up serving our needs instead. Let’s hope the same is true with LLMs.

In other news:

AI as a tool for worker surveillance.

LLM art steals from others. Which makes it ironic an AI artist is outraged people are stealing his work.

The Toddler administration’s goals for LLMs are apparently bad ones. Perhaps more AI deepfake videos of their political enemies?

AI does not grasp history.

Leave a comment

Filed under Writing

A sort-of defense of men

As I’ve mentioned before, the belief that society can’t exist without hierarchy — is one of the obstacles to equality. If you believe one race/religion/gender/orientation must rank over others, then equality is impossible: feminists and civil rights activists really want to turn the tables and make women and POC the superior class. Hence the many stories I’ve read over the years where women’s equality translates into men reduced to slavery or at least being forced to stay home and clean all day.

On top of which, patriarchy makes men stupid. It tells them a system that’s still predominantly shaped to their needs and interests is right and natural — they deserve to be in charge, to not be slut-shamed the way women are, to have their wife or partner handle most of the cooking, cleaning and childcare. It’s awfully tempting not to question a system that tells you something like that. And as Celeste Davis points out in some of her posts at Matriarchal Blessing, equality gains women status and power compared to patriarchy. For men it’s not only that equality feels like oppression, it’s that if they’re doing “women’s work” or filling a “woman’s role” then they’re no longer Real Men. Not to mention their buddies might make fun of them for being girly. As Davis says, it’s difficult for men to swim against that tide.

However there’s more to the tide than merely guys not wanting equality. As Susan Faludi pointed out 35 years ago, the backlash against feminism has been consistent and ongoing since the 1980s. A lot of that backlash is directed at women but a lot of it preaches to men too. It assures them there’s no need to listen to women — they’re so irrationally angry.

The religious right in the 1980s began preaching the women belong in the kitchen. The Reagan administration pined for the 1950s, when men had their (supposedly) rightful place as family head (an illusion that lives on today). When sexual harassment became a legal concept, there were plenty of articles about how men were miserable at work, terrified of being sued; there were a lot fewer articles about women feeling safer. Rush Limbaugh preached the evils of all things liberal, including feminism, and like many conservative pundits claimed a woman’s no can mean yes. Warren Farrell’s Myth of Male Power claimed men are the truly oppressed gender and presented rape as a woman having “more sex than expected,” the equivalent of eating too many potato chips at a sitting.

Gen Z men are more sexist than Boomers and Gen X, longing for a marriage where they’re the boss (though apparently a wife working outside the home and acting tradwife inside it is their idea) and bring home a breadwinner wage. Never mind that even in the 1950s, not everyone had a breadwinner wage or lived in a one-earner family; in the 21st century economy, it’s even less likely. Which Noosphere at the link suggests is one reason men long for a home in which they can have the authority and status that’s their due.

There is no shortage of influencers, pundits and online shitbags to tell them this. Matt Walsh, Allie Beth Stuckey, Suzanne Venker, Andrew Tate, James Taranto at the Wall Street Journal. Plenty of others who will insist white men can’t get jobs any more. Extremists like neo-Nazi Andrew Anglin who use misogyny as a marketing tool. The Heritage Foundation embraces it as policy. Mainstream voices who think incels have a point when they demand the redistribution of women. Or claim that women had more liberty in the 1800s. Or that AI will improve men’s prospects because it will take women’s jobs first.

The religious right’s positions haven’t gotten any less misogynist: they’re shiny, happy people who preach absolute male authority as the will of god. It’s easy to focus on slime like Andrew Tate; this shit is equally harmful. No surprise Joseph Duggar (brother to infamous sibling-molester Josh) has been accused of sexual activity with a minor. Bethel Church prophet (their designation, not mine) Ben Armstrong allegedly sexually abused a 23 year old years ago, describing himself as “her spiritual father.” The church later portrayed it as an “affair.” William Wolfe is a Southern Baptist who wants to impose his Christian morality on everyone; by his standards allowing women to preach is a much more serious problem than the church’s rape-and-cover-up scandal. He clams his views are God’s views; if that were true (I do not believe God is a misogynist rape-apologist), then I think it’s time to say, a la Huckleberry Finn, “Stop the rapes and go to hell for it.” It’s not surprising more Christian women seek help from therapists than pastors.

Not that Christianity is unique. All kinds of power structures give men the power to abuse women; women in similar positions can abuse their subordinates but it doesn’t seem to be as common (i.e., power matters but gender appears to matter too). Legendary labor leader Cesar Chavez abused women and assaulted underage girls; he was a power in his movement and it went unchecked. Hispanics who admired him are now having to deal with his evil side. Kevin Levin looks at how schools named for Chavez should approach the issue. Columnist Gustavo Arellano discusses separating the man from the cause.

Talking about Chavez, Jill Filopovic looks at another form of backlash, the claims women are really the ones in power (Farrell built his whole book around that premise): “It’s bullshit. And this insistence on eclipsing where real power lies and how real power manifests is precisely why men like Chavez got away with horrific crimes, and with many smaller indignities and acts of misogyny. This denial of small-time interpersonal misogyny is how we get denials of horrific abuses — a good man would never believe himself to be more powerful than his wife; a good man would never harm the girls and women around him; being honest about what we see in front of us would create a fissure in a good family, bring down a good movement.”

Endless propaganda doesn’t excuse those who buy into it. None of what I’ve said excuses Epstein, Cosby, or the countless unnamed rapists, harassers and misogynists we never hear about. At the same time, I do believe the problem with achieving equality runs deeper than an innate male resistance to change.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics, Undead sexist cliches

The hippies didn’t save physics but they did save food: two books

HOW THE HIPPIES SAVED PHYSICS: Science, Counterculture and the Quantum Revival by David Kaiser (the Atom cover was the closest to a physics image I had handy) argues that when the pre-WW II physics community pondered quantum physics, they wondered what it could all mean. Then the Manhattan Project and the push for applied science in the Cold War provided a rush of funding but for practical, applied physics — don’t worry about how the weirdness of subatomic particles makes sense, just crunch numbers!

By the 1960s, funding was dwindling. A new crop of researchers interested in Eastern mysticism and parapsychology began looking at how it all fit together — could Bell’s Theorem that electrons could interact somehow at a distance explain psi-powers like Uri Geller? This drew attention and funding from everyone from the CIA to EST-founder Werner Erhard; in the end, the wild new ideas didn’t lead to anything but they did spark fresh interest in asking “how does it work?”

The idea all of this saved physics is a bit of a stretch. I had a bigger problem in that it’s focused more on the researchers’ counter-culture lives (hanging out at Esalen, attending EST workshops) and I wanted more of the wild physics (quantum mechanics and nonlocality really are weird, wild shit). So a disappointment.

Happily looking for that book in the library catalog introduced me to the more interesting HIPPIE FOOD: How Back-to-the-Landers, Longhairs and Revolutionaries Changed the Way We Eat by Jonathan Kauffman

Kauffman takes us back to the days when soup came in cans, white bread, white rice and white flour were the norm, and cereal was full of sugar. In the 1960s and 1970s, stuff I can now find in Publix or Harris Teeter, such as granola or tofu, were weird, exotic and not terribly appealing.

Change came from a variety of sources, even before the hippies were a thing. Pre-WW II, health reformers and mystic were touting the benefits of fresh food over canned and whole wheat flour over white, though as with The Great American Medicine Show, the sensible advice was mixed in with crackpot ideas and assurances about achieving perfect health (balance yin and yang in your diet and you’ll never get sick!). In the hippie age these ideas really flourished as food co-ops, anti-capitalists and farmers growing something called “organic vegetables” embraced similar ideas. This time they caught on. However the dreams of transforming agribusiness didn’t come to pass: instead, the capitalist system incorporated the ideas and foods and kept going. Many ventures found they had to turn a profit to keep operating; back-to-the-land advocates discovered that when crops fail due to storms or weather, you get very hungry. More informative than the physics book and occasionally amusing (some of the debates over how to proceed remind me of political arguments in college).

All rights to images remain with current holders. Atom cover by Gil Kane.

Leave a comment

Filed under Reading

It’s only a nightmare charlie brown

Every year, the Carolina Theatre in downtown Durham hosts the Nevermore Film Festival showcasing horror movies. Typically since the pandemic we manage to catch one film or stream a couple; it’s a lot harder to go hang out there for a weekend when we have to walk dogs. This year, our pick was It’s Only A Nightmare Charlie Brown, the festival’s name for the animated shorts block.

In The Creature of the Deep a lesbian college student grudgingly endures her parents dragging her to her uncle’s home on spring break. Then it turns out she’s there to be her generation’s sacrifice to the underwater horror the family worships …

113 Words for You Today is set on a mining planet where speech is tightly rationed, and one miner is doing his best to save al his words for an evening phone call.

Dungeon Crawler has a woman pick up an old Atari adventure game (the director said in the Q&A that it’s not the only Haunted Atari film out there), somehow connect it up to her computer but hmm, some of the warnings and instructions seem … ominous. Striking, partly because the director uses the voice actor’s real eyes in the animated body to create an uncanny valley effect.

In the extremely creepy The Other, a woman goes looking for her husband and finds him under the bed, hiding — but from what?

The Paper Ghost has Edgar Allan Poe literally pouring his heart out to bring him closer to the dead spirit of his lost love.

Elvira pits a killer in a farming community against a psychic crime-solving rooster.

Foreign Bodies has a woman scratch her skin. Her skin peels back and things crawl out …

The Last Bell is a relatively straight horror story: a vampire hunter warns his wife if he returns after the midnight chimes ring out, he’s been turned. He arrives exactly as the bells finish — should she let him in?

In Lights, kindly little aliens help out an inventor; I liked this, though TYG is right that it’s not at all horror.

The thought of Moving from his home outrages a tween to the point he turns to stone; what’s his family to do?

In Hellwriting, a teacher discovers bad handwriting is the least of her problems with the dark things the students are writing. This was the weakest — it needed some sort of explanation or rationalization to work.

And in A Voice in the Mist, an old woman and her plucky dog protect a young girl from the local sirens.

Links to some past Nevermore viewing here and here (I know there’s more but I haven’t time to find the links).

All rights to images remain with current holders.

Leave a comment

Filed under Movies