I’m old enough to remember the bicentennial

(No movie reviews today. Independence Day column instead!)

In his book Invisible Bridge, Ron Perlstein has a bemused sneer about the Bicentennial celebration. He sounds astonished that even with America collapsing around us, Americans could sort of agree to celebrate. It reflects the general tone of the book that the 1970s sucked and we all knew it (at the link, author Thomas Hine expresses an alternative view).

The Bicentennial did indeed feel like a big deal in 1976. And for a couple of years before. Comic books tied in to it. Products of all sorts flaunted their Americanness. And for all the problems Perlstein talks about, there was a lot of optimism. The Vietnam War had ended, the US and the USSR had thawed the Cold War somewhat, women’s rights and black rights had advanced massively from a decade earlier. 18 year olds had the right to vote. The pill and Roe v Wade meant women could be sexually active without having to bear a child. Nixon had been driven from office after Watergate revealed his unfitness for office. That (and related revelations about the CIA and the FBI) was shocking but it was proof we could solve our problems and do better. We would do better. And the president at the time, Gerald Ford, realized the Bicentennial was not about him.

Recently JD Vance declared that by modern standards, Nixon’s crimes were trivial. He meant it as a defense — the deep state destroyed Nixon, like they’re trying to destroy the Toddler! — but it’s more like an indictment of how far we’ve fallen. The Toddler commits about one Watergate class crime a week, like using taxpayer money to build his stupid ballroom, then lying about it.. Nixon had a secret list of enemies he wanted to punish; the Toddler blatantly targets the media for not kissing his ass and someone was just indicted for supposedly sabotaging Widdle Donny’s precious reflecting pool. That’s horrifying and I’m sure the evidence is as flimsy as all the other pool-related charges. And as unjust as sentencing protesters as anti-ICE terrorists.

Small wonder nobody’s showing up for his 250th anniversary events. It seems to be a mix of lack of interest, heat and incompetent organizing. As John Scalzi puts it, “a malignant narcissist decided to make a national celebration mostly about himself, and that malignant narcissist is also an actual fascist, so that kind of sucked all the fun out of it this year.”

Like Scalzi, I believe justice will prevail. It may take long enough that we will not live to see its end; many of those who labored against slavery and segregation did not. As historian Kevin Leman says, “For most of its American existence, slavery was not contested. It was not being loudly defended because it was not being loudly challenged. It was simply the air that colonial economies breathed. The Germantown Quakers may have protested it in 1688, but their petition was quietly tabled and largely forgotten.” It was a long fight to discredit it, and too many people today are still nostalgic for it.

But as the radical priest Daniel Berrigan once put it, we do the right thing and fight the good fight because they’re right and good, not because we’re guaranteed victory. As a Christian, I believe that’s what god wants from us. As a human being, I agree with blogger Fred Clark that we should do the right thing because the alternative is becoming a ginormous jackhole. Seriously, who would you rather be, Martin Luther King or JD Vance?

As I’ve said before, I’m not sure what policies we should embrace going forward. As a number of liberals are saying, we need change. Definitely structural government reforms to undo some of the damage (packing the court, for instance, to neutralize the Sinister Six). Practical stuff, the little helpful things Mayor Mamdani is doing in NYC. Speak out against Republican fascism, and the little stupid things, like the way the Toddler’s wasting our tax dollars on monuments to himself. And a vision: equality for all, end rape over the next 20 years, universal literacy. Change the immigration laws so everyone currently entering illegal can enter legally. Do not throw anyone under the bus. Remind everyone that we are patriots and some of us are Christians — Republicans don’t get to define those terms and claim them as their own.

Any one of those will be difficult, and face lots of opposition. As I’ve said previously, even defining what “equality for all” means and how we get there is hard work. But we might as well shoot big.

And we should remember that if a former slave like Frederick Douglass could press on against the odds so can we: “Douglass did not end in despair and neither should we. His closing lines are not triumphalist, but they are resolute. Even with freedom of speech and the ballot “fallen before the shot-guns of the South,” he urged that we “bate no jot of heart or hope.” The heart of the nation, he maintained, was “still sound and strong.””

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

Cats, borders, knees, writing, blood! My week in review

First the blood: Saturday I made my regular donation to the Red Cross. They’ve remodeled their facility and I was the first “power red” (double dose of red blood cells) donor there. I wrapped up just a little too soon for someone from the regional HQ to photograph me, darn it. That would have been kind of cool.

Tuesday, it was cat day: time to take Snowdrop in for his wellness exam and shots. He’s way harder to cage for the trip than Wisp; she’ll let us pick her up which gives us a chance to shove her in. Snow’s less trusting. However I got a dose of gabapentin — painkiller that also makes ’em sleepy — into him with a small morning meal. That left him just groggy enough to load into a cat carrier. He’s mostly in good shape, however he does have a heart murmur. Those can be bad in cats so we’re waiting to see what the labwork says.

Minor bonus, they applied his topical heartworm/flea med so we don’t have to do that again for two months.

Borders: as I type this, the theme I use for this blog has suddenly dropped the illustration on the vertical borders so there’s nothing but the image at the top. Maybe it’s a temporary thing and it’s gone by now. Maybe I’ll have to change themes because the brown border looks dreadful. I haven’t had a chance to do anything about it yet.

Knees: Tuesday, after TYG brought Snowdrop home, I went to physical therapy. Nothing major but my left knee gives me twinges in certain positions. I’d like it to stop. The therapist gave me a set of exercises which I’ve been working on. Too soon for any miracle cures, though. I also got a sleep apnea kit in the mail — my doctor thought that might relate to my recurrent insomnia — and I spent three nights with a testing kit on, making me feel like a cyborg. My grimace below is because I also felt like Hannibal Lector in his muzzle in Silence of the Lambs.

I slept better than I expected with that thing on. However it was choppy, which contributed to my tiredness for some of the week. Plus the pets were needier than usual. Still I got some good stuff done. Articles for The Local Reporter on Carrboro’s 2027 budget and the drought’s impact on Carrboro (not up yet). That took up Monday and Tuesday.

Wednesday I tackled the next chapter of Let No Man Put Asunder. Didn’t go well. The changes I’m making are good but they’re the kind that require further changes — if the sinister Community of All simply puts everyone in Bluestone in a stoned trance, Mandy doesn’t have the conflict of fighting innocent mind-controlled people. It still works better and fits the Community’s strange goals; however I have no idea what comes next. And Wednesday I was most tired.

Thursday I worked on “Die and Let Live.” It’s steadily improving but ends up way too talky as Colin and Deadbeat explain what’s been happening and everyone debates ethics. Either I shift some of that material earlier in the story, I come up with a more dramatic ending or both (ideally both).

I also got the first scene of a new story. My mind generated several new details: one character, Claire, comes from the town of Riddle Grove where her family lives at Enigma Towers. And their last name, Maistery, sounds a lot like “Mystery” if you say it aloud. Her estranged best friend notes the pattern and decides they’ll make a joke about it later. I have no idea what it means but it isn’t anything funny. So my mind’s clearly engaged — not enough to figure out what comes next yet.

Today was, as usual, devoted to next week’s blog posts, planning what to write, and emptying my in-box. Plus we took Trixie and Plushie in for some shots and, as Plushie’s been walking wobbly recently, asked the vet about it. She says he might have some back pain and recommended upping his gabapentin dose for now. Makes sense as we lowered it a couple of months back. We’ll see if it helps.

What made the visit memorable is that Plushie expressed his displeasure by pooping on the exam room floor. And then several alarmingly runny poops after that. Hopefully it’s just a momentary lapse and not the return of his dread diarrhea. We’ll see.

And now for something completely cool, author’s copies of Southern Discomfort arrived this week.

Cover by Samantha Collins. All rights are mine.

Leave a comment

Filed under Personal, Short Stories, Southern Discomfort, Story Problems, The Dog Ate My Homework, Time management and goals

Sleeping pets

They put us through the wringer some weeks, and eventually it catches up with them.

Leave a comment

Filed under The Dog Ate My Homework

What are human lives compared to science?

That’s the kind of argument you’d get from a B-movie mad scientist back in the last century: sure, there might be some adverse side-effects from their experiments, maybe the patients didn’t exactly consent — but how can science advance if you worry about ethics? Now Jeff Bezos has made that exact argument about AI (this clip comes from a twitter account by one Lisa Kippy):

There is a boatload of bullshit packed into that statement like the assumption LLMs will eventually become “a super-intelligence that could solve all our resource problems.” And that the growth of data centers, despite their demands for electricity and water, are a good, no a great thing, because science! We can’t worry about things like humans having adequate water for their needs — after all, it’s not like they’re Jeff Bezos or someone whose thirst matters.

This adds to the reasons for hating AI that Paul Krugman discusses here. For all their talk about the wonderful future ahead, what they tell us, repeatedly, is that AI is going to take all our jobs. Marc Andreesen literally claims it will take all the brain-power and creative jobs except, of course, venture capitalists like himself — no mere computer intelligence could do what he does (Kevin Leman discusses, more accurately, why LLMs can’t do what historians do)! Krugman remembers other techbros predicting 20 percent unemployment due to LLMs. Plus it will replace all creative work so authors, musicians and others can do … what? Somehow I don’t think they imagine the Jetsons kind of future where we can make a good living working an hour a day pushing buttons.

And as Krugman notes, we’re being pushed to use LLMs in various ways, whether we want to our not. My writer’s group had to put in more effort than we should to stop Zoom’s AI from recording us reading our stories. Nothing nefarious — it was an automatic, like taking minutes — but we still don’t fancy someone recording our work without our consent. Silicon Valley screams about how wonderful it is but it’s spreading more from pressure than the enthusiasm with which we adopted home computers or the Internet. Apparently even businesses are discovering the cost is not worth the output that results, as Krugman and 404 Media note.

Or consider California State University insisting they have to invest in AI to train their students for the “AI-driven future of work.” Which assumes the future will be driven by LLMs and that training to use them is the best use of the college’s money. Meanwhile, in the actual working world, the use of LLMs by both job-seekers and hirers is wreaking havoc on the job market.

Perhaps it’s unsurprising tech companies are presenting themselves as victims of some radical conspiracy. Kevin O’Leary, who’s developing a data center in Utah, had to walk back his accusations opponents of his center were proxies for China. Cops are monitoring criticism of data centers because who knows, maybe the critics wi’ll turn violent. One man who spoke out against data centers at a city council meeting was arrested for speaking too long. It would have been appropriate for cops to escort him out for speaking beyond the public-comment limits but arrest? That’s insane. Perhaps cops like AI because companies are so willing to share surveillance data without any Fourth Amendment concerns.

In other LLM notes:

Companies have figured out how to manipulate LLM searches for data.

LLMs are not helpful at answering small-molecule mass spectrometry questions.

How bad will Google going with AI summaries over actual links hurt online companies?

For a nonfiction writer, the only way to ensure LLMs aren’t giving you false data is not to use them.

If LLMs are sentient, so is the computer game Age of Empires.

“AI systems are beginning to replicate the same anti-LGBTQ bias and misinformation problems that have long plagued social platforms, according to a new GLAAD report previewed at Axios’ AI+NY Summit. The problems GLAAD flags — biased training data, privacy risks, automated discrimination, misinformation and the suppression of legitimate speech — extend beyond LGBTQ users to other minorities and groups in political disfavor.”

“Less than a day after President Donald Trump falsely suggested that Ilhan Omar had staged an attack on herself, the images started to circulate. In AI-generated fake photos that soon flooded both X and Facebook, the Minnesota representative is depicted posing next to the man who invaded a town hall meeting and sprayed apple cider vinegar on her from a syringe. In the AI-generated images, Omar and the man are both smiling; in some, the congresswoman is foisting a wad of cash, presumably to suggest that she bribed her attacker. “

I’ll close with some advice from David Dark: “Be the non-AI generated content you want to see in the world.”

Leave a comment

Filed under economics, Politics

A good writing insight from Carl Dreyer

Carl Dreyer is the Danish director of Vampyr, an adaptation of LeFanu’s short story, “Carmilla.” Discussing the movie, the book Classics of the Horror Film had a quote from Dreyer so striking I took a photo:

I don’t see any immediate application to the stuff I’m working on but I think it’s worth sharing.

Leave a comment

Filed under Writing

How dare Zohram Mamdani suggest incumbent politicians should have to fight off challengers!

I’m delighted to see NYC Mayor Zohram Mamdani is delivering on his campaign promises to make life better for New Yorkers. Filling potholes. Free child care for city workers (eventually everyone). High-tech port-a-potties to compensate for the city’s toilet shortage. A rent freeze for hundreds of apartments.

It’s unsurprising Republicans such as President Toddler or the new DHS head Markwayne Mullin hate his guts. It pisses me off that some Dems are also unhappy with him — because by not being centrist, by showing you can win without steering to the center, Mamdani suggests alternative politics they’re uncomfortable with. He ran a successful campaign, generated massive enthusiasm, he’s proving government can help people in concrete ways — they could learn from him. Sure, his politics might not be a good seller in other parts of the country but helping people in practical ways is always good. What can other Dems in other areas do?

Instead, many of Dem officie holders showed they were more comfortable with Andrew Cuomo, a sexual harasser who got endorsements from the Toddler and Stephen Miller.

This past week it got worse. Mamdani endorsed several candidates in NYC’s recent primaries. The voters backed them over the incumbents. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (a New York representative himself) thinks Mamdani needs to apologize to Congress. This from a politician who refused to criticize corrupt former mayor Eric Adams. New York AG Letitia James has sided with Jeffries: Mamdani is blowing up the Democratic Party and that’s wrong! James Carville, veteran political consultant (which is not to say his opinions are particularly good) says these results convince him he’s done with the Democratic Party

This is ridiculous. While Mamdani’s support may have been influential, it’s the voters who ultimately made the call. Does Jeffries think they should apologize? If he does, he has the sense not to say so. I think his reaction is a mix of discomfort with Mamdani’s left-wing politics and a sense among incumbent politicians that the seat is theirs — sure, they may lose to a member of the opposite party but for someone to challenge them in a primary? What about their rights? The late, unctuous Senator Joe Lieberman once whined that having another Democrat challenge him, a sitting senator, in the primary, was virtually terrorism.

No More Mr. Nice Blog points out one of the winners is indeed far to the left of most Dems but pointing to her and saying her win is unacceptable only draws more attention to her. However she’s only one candidate for one congressional district. The idea she’ll define the party’s politics is daft. Sure, Republicans might make a thing out of her politics (abolish prisons, abolish cops, intermarriage bad) but they’d treat a centrist winner to the same smear tactics (as I’ve mentioned before) so what’s the diff? By contrast Republicans have extreme and idiotic candidates (and extremist idiots) but those candidates never define the entire party. Perhaps, as NMMNB says, because they don’t denounce their own. Plus there’s nothing on the left equivalent to the right wing propaganda organization for spreading lies and assassinating character.

As John Rogers says, a lot of people don’t want the status quo. Lots of establishment Dems want to offer them, at best, a slightly improved status quo, one where things work a little smoother. NYC voters have made it clear that’s no longer sufficient. “Nobody wants all the fucking crazy, be it armed thugs in the streets, insane gaslighting president, mass shootings or wealth inequality or inflation or wars … They do not want this, no matter how ill-defined, or possibly undefinable, this is. And they certainly do not want people who are super into crypto or AI or funding ICE but training them better, basically, they do not want the Dem waiter to KEEP BRINGING THEM THE SOUP, SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT.”

That doesn’t mean everyone wants Mamdani. It does mean they’re ready for change. Courtney Milan makes the same point on Bluesky: ‘We are tired of doing all the work and then being told that our vote is a lock, we have no choice, and so you have to go run around chasing MAGA votes.”

I’ll close with this screen shot from a Hunter Biden post about the lessons politicians anywhere can learn from the primaries.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

Southern Discomfort: my supporting cast

My Southern Discomfort supporting cast was heavily shaped by one creative decision and one awkward realization.

The creative decision was setting it in 1973. Originally I’d had my protagonist driving into town with a friend (an approach I discussed last week did not work); once I settled on ’73, it seemed logical they’d show up by bus. Which meant someone would have to meet them. Enter: Joan Slattery.

The awkward realization was looking at my first novel-length draft — this was originally a novella but it kept growing — and realizing it was an awfully white book. Shouldn’t I have some POC in the cast? Of course there were ways to work around that. The community founders were Irish (and elves, of course) and I could see them discouraging outside visitors let alone new residents. That would keep the town lily white into the present.

Only rationalizing an all-white book still left me with an all-white book. Easier — I’m used to writing women but I haven’t done much with POC in stories past — but it felt cheap and cowardly. So I decided Pharisee did have a large black population, like many Southern communities. That meant having to think about race relations there, past and present. Enter: Liz Mitchell.

In my final draft, my protagonist Maria strikes up conversations with Captain Jefferson Carpenter — Vietnam veteran, JAG, part of his right arm gone — and Kirby Slattery, who left Pharisee to pursue an art career. It’s Joan “Squiddly” Slattery — as a kid she loved Hanna Barbera’s “Squiddly Diddly” cartoon — who meets Kirby at the bus station. And acting on guidance from Olwen, ends up identifying Maria as the person Olwen McAlister has seen in a vision, the one fated to bring Aubric McAlister’s killer to justice.

One publisher’s reader said Joan was the most interesting character and ought to be the protagonist. I dig that. She’s sweet, sunny, stubborn when she gets her dander up; like Maria the crisis in Pharisee forces her to step up and become more than she’s been before, though in a different way. Joan proves herself a hero. And also, I think she’s a very likable young woman. In romance-novel terms she’s the sunshine to Maria’s grump (though no, they do not have a thing for each other).

Liz Mitchell came along a lot later. My primary black character was a reporter hired by the Pharisee Beacon to cover black news in the county, a concession that white people doing all the reporting didn’t cut it in 1973. Slowly he discovers there’s more going on in Pharisee than he thought. Nobody in my writing group found him terribly interesting. Nor any of the subplots involving the paper.

I’m not sure what prompted me to shift focus to his sister, but it proved an inspired idea. Though in the finished draft, the reporter’s nowhere to be found. Liz is the daughter of Bridget Blake, one of the “black Blakes” who dominate business in the black community. There are white Blakes who run the white business community, another branch of the same family. They don’t like each other much — there was a big dispute over whether an interracial marriage 80 years earlier had been a marriage or merely a hookup, which determined who inherited a big pot of money — but hey, business is business.

The older Pharisee blacks, remembering when lynching was common throughout the south, are very appreciative they live in a community where the McAlisters didn’t allow that. Nor did visits by KKK night-riders pose a threat — part of the county’s legend, the “Pharisee mystery,” is that nobody in the Klan’s three attacks on Pharisee ever returned. Or so the Klan says, but who’s going to take that crazy talk seriously, right? Bridget was one of the first of the younger generation to think the county could do better: end Jim Crow, integrate, don’t be so afraid of drawing attention (something the McAlisters fear greatly, as the book explains). She locked horns with Olwen despite them being friends; after she went off to college she never returned.

Liz grew up with her mother telling stories about growing up in a town with elves. She took them in the same spirit as if she’d been told “When I lived in Canada, Santa Claus used to invite us over for Christmas dinner.” Bridget never went back but after her death, Liz and her husband moved to Pharisee because it’s become a bedroom community for upper class Atlanta blacks, close to the city but quieter and with less crime. And Liz and her four-year-old son get to meet her extended family there.

Liz was perfectly positioned to be a POV character. She has roots in the African-American community but she doesn’t know Pharisee’s secrets (yet). In a county that’s been largely resistant to women’s liberation, she’s a feminist. Because she was friends with Richard Cannon, who was killed along with Aubric McAlister, she’s angry. The mix worked.

FBI Special Agent Rachel Cohen is another POV character in my ensemble cast (I won’t be listing all of them). One of the first women to become an FBI agent, she has one spectacular case on her record, stopping a FALN (Puerto Rican independence militant group) terrorist bombing. Kenning, her superior in Atlanta, put her on the McAlister case less because of her success than because she’s inexperienced. She fails, every woman in the FBI looks suspect. Rachel is very conscious of the pressure she’s under. As a Southern woman, she’s supposed to wield an iron fist hidden in a velvet glove; she’s forgetting the glove.

I think a key scene for Rachel is when Joan’s father Sheriff Slattery calls her in for help with what appears to be a lynching. Cohen’s horrified but as she tells the sheriff, she’s there to solve the McAlister/Cannon murder. She cannot divert resources to solve a local murder. Nor does she believe Slattery’s argument that the killings all tie together (spoiler: they do). It’s a harsh decision but it’s the professional one to make. And she’s a professional.

My next post will deal with the characters around whom everything revolves, Olwen McAlister and her mysterious foe Gwalchmai. Stay tuned.

Cover by Sam Collins. Rights are mine.

Leave a comment

Filed under Southern Discomfort, Writing

Undead sexist cliche: women are merely support systems for their vaginas

That’s how Virginia Roberts Giuffre quotes Jeffrey Epstein’s misogny: “a woman is a life-support system for a vagina.” It’s an attitude I suspect many of the rich, influential men entering Epstein’s world of subordinate, controlled women would agree with. Probably many men beyond that, the same way they’d agree with neo-Nazi Andrew Anglin’s claim that women’s wombs belong to men.

This is patriarchy, the belief that any man outranks all women; no matter how much of a failure you are, you can always look down and see women securely under you. It’s the world of misogyny. Sexists believe (for example) that all women want to be tradwives; misogynists don’t care what they want, they’re going to force them into that role anyway. Anglin, for example, claims that as women don’t know they’ll be happiest as a submissive tradwife, men have to force them into it.

Another variation is Stephen Miller’s Katie Miller declaring that having multiple babies is biological destiny; having a womb defines women and women’s purpose in life. No, it doesn’t. The ability to have babies does not equate to an obligation or destiny to do so. Katie Miller, like so many female misogynists, is a special snowflake who has her own career, money and obviously doesn’t feel any qualms about Republicans making it ever more difficult for moms, whether it’s cutting off SNAP benefits or watching ob/gyns move out of red states.

Right-wing misogynists are increasingly open about how much they resent women who insist on being people rather than vaginal support systems. Jesse Watters of Fox News, for instance, dismissing Hilary Clinton as a woman who did a man’s job and in his opinion, badly. Though “opinion” implies he’s actually put some thought into it rather than spitting out whatever insult comes to mind.

For some in the forced-birth movement, women’s only value is, similarly, that they serve as incubators for the fetus. We know contraception reduces abortion rates; nevertheless, the Toddler Administration destroyed $10 million in contraceptives intended for USAID. Avoiding pregnancy is a sensible decision if you don’t want a baby but for Republicans it’s a sign you’re an irresponsible slut.

As they’re continuing to assert the right not to be pregnant, even after the Dobbs decision, enthusiasm for treating women who get abortions as murderers is growing among forced-birthers. It’s not something the entire movement agrees on — some disagree strongly, some merely see it as bad optics — but a lot of them would sooner see women dead than let them control their own bodies. And plenty of cops and prosecutors are already eager to prosecute women. And to cooperate with their abusers. As Jessica Valenti says at the link, it’s “the predictable outcome of living in a reproductive police state bent on surveillance and punishment.”

Women have turned themselves in for drug treatment when they learn they’re pregnant and gotten locked up instead. They’ve been arrested for being on legal prescription meds while pregnant, for drinking while pregnant (it’s legal), arrested for painting while pregnant (fumes might have hurt the baby!) and for getting shot in the belly while pregnant (she should have de-escalated the confrontation instead of putting the baby at risk!). In many cases, the victims of this persecution are POC. My apologies for not providing links, but you can find most of these examples in Undead Sexist Cliches, with footnotes.

As Jessica Valenti notes, until they can completely criminalize abortion and abortion pills, they’ll settle for little cruelties, like forcing women who have miscarriages or abortions to collect the blood and tissue and give it to a doctor. They’re also targeting websites that provide morning-after pills. And of course, harassing women. Even women with nonviable pregnancies, as noted at that last link. Georgia Republican Terry England, more than a decade ago, said it was no big deal if a woman carried a dead fetus to term — cows and pigs do it all the time! Ectopic pregnancies? Many forced birthers and doctors don’t support abortion for those either. The woman at the link lost her fertility as a result.

They’re also lying that the reason for the witch trials was to fight abortion. This fits into the speaker’s (Noleen Sedra) worldview — feminism is modern witchcraft! — but we have ample records of trials and accusations and no, that is not what the witch trials were about. She’s either ignorant or lying.

To end on an up note, sort of, here’s a great profile of an abortion clinic escort who’s not backing away despite forced-birther hatred.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics, Undead sexist cliches

Reviews of mostly disappointing nonfiction

Walt Disney was a name to conjure with when I was a kid. The movies of the 1960s and 1970s were no classics but there were still rereleases (Snow White left me terrified of the Queen for years), the Wonderful World of Disney TV show, the comic books and the legend Disney had built up over years. Small wonder BABES IN TOMORROWLAND: Disney and the Making of the American Child, 1930-1960 by Nicholas Sammond intrigued me. Alas, like The CIA Book Club the title is clickbait; unlike that book, the content did not intrigue me and I DNFed.

Sammond’s focus isn’t a bad topic: with 20th century urbanization and the new medium of moving pictures, bringing up kids suddenly seemed harder than ever before. Would movies expose them to bad influences? Would living in the city make it easier for them to fall into vice and sin? A boom in child-rearing advice followed, and of course, never went away. Walt Disney cannily promoted himself as a safe haven: you could trust him to turn out quality, family-friendly movies that would be safe for kids. However Disney is little more than a subplot and Sammond draws unconvincing conclusions — did you know the subtext of “The Sorcerer’s Apprentice” in Fantasia is that if you leave your kids unsupervised, they’ll screw everything up? The child-rearing stuff wasn’t interesting to me without that.


REACTION! Chemistry in the Movies by Mark Griepp and Marjorie Mikasen seemed full of promise when I started reading and they discussed Jekyll and Hyde topics such as the recurrent use of mirrors in the film adaptations (a point I wish I’d included in Watching Jekyll and Hyde) and speculate about the makeup of Jekyll’s formula. However the movie is also wrong on one point and as it moves on to Invisible Man, The Absent-Minded Professor and more it makes many curious choices. How do you write about cocaine’s history as an anesthetic and not mention the film Edge of Sanity? Why include Back to the Future — yes, plutonium is a chemical, but needing it to power the DeLorean hardly makes this a movie about chemistry? Ultimately the creator seem more interested in real-world chemistry than the movies and I needed more of the latter.

As Paul in Let No Man Put Asunder has the ability to see Kirlian auras I thought an interlibrary loan of PICTURING AURA: A Visual Biography by Jeremy Stolow might be useful. It was, but it was also a slog to read through. Stolow’s history of efforts by mystics, Russian Senmo Kirlian and multiple other parapsychologists to visualize, photograph and explain the human aura is way too credulous about the psychics he profiles and suffused with academic jargon. Among the interesting stuff was the career of screenwriter/parapsychologist Thelma Moss, an arguments that Russians weren’t as big on psi-research as legend tells (Soviet scientists found it incompatible with Marxist ma terialism). Among the weaknesses are that Stolow identifes the paranormal nonfiction magazine Fate as science fiction, making me wonder, as with Reaction!, what errors I’m not catching.

The winner of the week was Samantha Cole’s HOW SEX CHANGED THE INTERNET AND HOW THE INTERNET CHANGED SEX: An Unexpected History. Cole shows how sex goes back to the earliest days of the Internet: a bulletin board providing AIDS information, a Playboy centerfold that became the first digitally transmitted image, sex workers discovering the Internet offered safer ways to conduct their business. Standing against all this were censors, squeamish social networks and nervous hosting companies who flinched from useful sexual information as much as they did hardcore porn. This was a good history with some interesting points (people focus on the damage deepfakes could do in politics rather than their primary use, humiliating women); there’s surprisingly little about child porn which may reflect Cole’s frustration with Protect The Children rationales from anti-sex crusaders.

All rights to images remain with current holders.

Leave a comment

Filed under Reading

Bad guys, glaciers and Fritz Lang: movies viewed

Despite their redemption arc in The Bad Guys, the eponymous gang discover in THE BAD GUYS 2 (2025) that like so many real-world ex-cons, their felonious past makes them unemployable, which is leaving them broke. What’s the solution? Hey, if they capture the Phantom Badnit stealing items made of McGuffinite (“That name sounds made-up.”) that would prove they’re legit, right?

Of course it doesn’t work out like that. Wolf, Snake, Webs, Piranha and Shark end up blackmailed by the Bad Girls (though the movie doesn’t give the gang that name) into pulling one last job with them, stealing a space shuttle as the ultimate heist. Would it surprise you to know both sides are planning a double cross?

This works better as a sequel than I’d heard, though the continuity doesn’t quite sync with the Bad Guys Netflix series (the series shows Webs working with them in their pre-fame days; the movie has her signing on after they’re already big time). Clearly the producers are now in franchise mode so this ends with seeding for Bad Guys 3. I hope they can keep up the quality. “They’re escaping west in a hot-dog truck — probably all beef, possibly chorizo.”

I also caught the team’s Halloween special, Haunted Heist, in which they rob the haunted mansion of a legendary thief, never mind the supposed curse on his loot. This was stock holiday stuff, less effective than A Very Bad Christmas. “I’d never pose in chiaroscuro — it’s so tacky.”

TIME AND WATER (2026) is an Icelandic author’s documentary on his family life and how the glaciers his grandparents once scaled are now dying in the age of global warming, the small Ok Glacier already having Gone to Dust. Poetic, though the appeal, like many other documentaries, is primarily the Pretty Pictures. “The glacier is no longer in geologic time.”

FOUR AROUND THE WOMAN (1921) is the final film in that Early Years Fritz Lang set TYG got me for Christmas. As shady businessman Rudolfe Klein-Rogge works on some scheme, he also worries about his wife cheating on him. The woman’s former sweetheart would love it if that were true, but he too is entangled in the criminal skullduggery. At least I think that’s the case: I had trouble following the crime plot, possibly because Plushie was in loud barking mode (even with a silent film, that’s distracting). Still the mix of crime schemes and social decadence, with looks at high society and low, make this feel more like Lang’s later films than The Wandering Shadow or Harakiri did.“In this fateful hour, I have come to set you straight.”

All rights to image remain with current holders.

Leave a comment

Filed under Movies