Category Archives: Movies

Corruption, contagion and a coyote: movies viewed

Steven Soderbergh’s THE INFORMANT (2009) is a based-on-truth film though the opening blithely warns us the director’s not prioritizing accuracy. Matt Damon plays Mark Whitacre, an Archer Daniels Midland executive who cooperated with FBI Agent Shepard (Scott Bakula) to expose the company’s massive price-fixing operations. As he explains it, he started out in the tech end, got bumped up to management and isn’t comfortable with it.

Public-spirited? Maybe. Then again, he tells his wife that this might open up opportunities in the hierarchy if anyone above him gets busted. And then it turns out that while working with the FBI he also launched several million-dollar scams and kickbacks to line his own pocket. And even before that, he made up stuff, like his tragic family history. Soderbergh doesn’t go deep or try to pin down Whitacre’s motives (he does dismiss out of hand the idea his bipolar illness was responsible), treating this more like the kind of “you won’t believe this story” you might tell a friend over coffee. Well-done. “Everyone in the country is a victim of corporate crime by the time they finish breakfast.”

Soderbergh’s next film, CONTAGION (2011), now looks almost creepily prescient post-covid. We have a disease that jumps from bats to pigs to humans, then explodes across the globe, spawning terror, grief, death, and also masking, social distancing, paranoid conspiracy theories and anti-vax hucksters. It’s also, from what I’ve read, accurate in its portrayal of how things work (or worked at the time — god knows what things look like under RFK Jr.), though one doctor said no way does the CDC get real-time information this quickly (and based on reading for Watching Jekyll and Hyde about self-experimentation, one doctor testing a vaccine on herself shouldn’t speed things up that much). Very good and well cast: Laurence Fishbourne as the head of the CDC, Gwyneth Paltrow as an adulterous Patient Zero, Matt Damon as her shellshocked husband, Marion Cotillard and Kate Winslet as doctors and Jude Law as an Alex Jones-style huckster. “Clearly we’re not lucky.”

Warners almost buried COYOTE VS. ACME (2026) in the studio vaults which would have been a great shame — and a great mistake, as it’s proving a solid hit for them. Fed up with decades of Acme products that boomerang on him, Wiley Coyote hires attorney Kevin Avery (Will Forte) to sue them. Avery is a schmuck who’d happily settle rather than take on the world’s biggest corporation and its ruthless legal team headed by Buddy Crane (John Cena). However as events progress it becomes obvious Acme is engaged in very shady business and Avery slowly realizes he’s not willing to walk away. This was a delightful, fun movie and offered some great Easter eggs (“Let’s go to our news team in Guadalajara, where a mouse just broke the sound barrier!”). Well worth seeing if you find the time. “Pursuant to Sylvester v. Gonzalez, ‘chase by predator’ is an occupation under the law.”

All rights to images remain with current holders.

Leave a comment

Filed under Movies

Dead Templars, a bouncer and a virgin: mediocre movies and TV

The Spanish film THE BLIND DEAD (1972), AKA Tombs of the Blind Dead, didn’t do much for me but it was popular enough to spawn three sequels. After an argument with her traveling companions, a young woman gets off the train she’s riding and takes shelter for the night in an old castle. This unfortunately stirs up the inhabitants: Templars hung in medieval times for their Satanic practices after which crows pecked out their eyes. The blind Templars rise out of their tombs and go on a killing spree, hunting their prey by sound (so The Quiet Place would be a good double bill). It’s a competently executed film, but it didn’t do much for me. “Black masses are a thing of the past, doctor.”

I watched ROAD HOUSE (1989) because TYG had it streaming last weekend; I’ve never seen it before and can’t say I missed anything. Patrick Swayze plays Dalton, a bouncer — sorry, a “cooler” which is apparently a head bouncer — who takes a job bringing order to Tombstone — er, to a wild, rowdy road house which is also under threat from local extortionist Ben Gazzara (I assume he took the gig for the money but he makes his villain far better than the film deserves). This is predictable — I figured out the fate of Swayze’s mentor (Sam Elliott) as soon as he showed up — but adequate to fill some time with. “It seems everywhere I go, I hear that same joke.”

VIRGIN OF THE SECRET SERVICE (1968) pits dauntless Captain Robert Virgin (Clinton Greyn), his aide Doublett (John Cater) and adventurer/photographer Mrs. Cortez (Veronica Strong) against German schemes to bring down the empire. In the first, the bad guys are working with an Afghan ruler to weaken British control of the area; in the second, they’re sponsoring a Chinese conspiracy. Teaming Cortez and Virgin makes me think they’re shooting for a Steed and Mrs. Peel vibe but despite some tongue-in-cheek moments they don’t come anywhere near close. Nor do lines about “Chinks” and the Yellow Peril go over well. I gave up on this after a couple of episodes. “Did you know French girls sit around in their birthday suits?”

All rights to images remain with current holders.

Leave a comment

Filed under Movies, TV

Once upon a time, this was indeed the greatest adventure

I’m a fan of the late 1970s Flash Gordon animated TV series but somehow I never got around to the 1982 feature-length version, FLASH GORDON: The Greatest Adventure of All. Before blogging about it, a bit of comic-strip history.

The Flash Gordon comic strip debuted in 1934 and blew the people reading the Sundaycomics pages away. In the opening story arc, Dr. Zarkov kidnaps Flash — a champion polo player — and beautiful Dale Arden to come with him to Mongo, a rogue planet hurtling towards Earth. On Mongo they become the resistance leaders against the tyrannical Ming the Merciless and criss-crossing the man cultures of Mongo: the winged Hawkmen, Prince Barin’s foresters, and multiple others.

It’s basic sword-and-planet stuff, the kind the pulps had been doing for more than 20 years by then. However reading it wasn’t the same as seeing it and in those days you didn’t see it. Nothing like it at the movies, no TV, no comic books. Flash Gordon became a star and Alex Raymond a legend. It would become three hit movie serials, a 1950s TV show, then the 1980 film, then the cartoon. And since then various appearances in comic books, the Defenders of Earth cartoon, comic books and more TV. I watched the first episode of the most recent TV show. Not good.

And then there’s The Greatest Adventure of All, which was much more enjoyable. We open in 1939 Warsaw as Olympic athlete turned US diplomat Flash Gordon struggles to help people during the Nazi invasion of Poland. He can’t but he gets a message from a brilliant Polish scientist to deliver to Dr. Zarkov — “One word … Mongo.” Flash and reporter Dale Arden reach Zarkov but the disruptions unleashed by Mongo’s approach force them to escape Zarkov’s isolated laboratory by rocket ship. Destination: Mongo. Can they stop Ming when he wields the terrifying power of atomic fission to fuel his technology? Can Flash unite Mongo’s warring factions into an organized opposition? Will Ming force Dale into marriage? Will his daughter Aura seduce Flash?

It’s action packed and fun … but it got me thinking whether there’s any point to continued revivals. Flash Gordon back when this came out was still a famous name, at least to nerds like me; now I’m not so sure. Certainly sword-and-planet remains popular but when Star Wars films and TV spinoffs fill more or less the same spot in pop culture, does Flash bring anything to the table?

Even the animated film, though it only came out in ’82, looks a little dated. The voice cast, except for Ted Cassidy as the lion man Thun, is forgettable; these days I’d expect a much stronger acting team. And the women’s roles, while true to the original series, are dreadful (making me appreciate John Carter for doing so well with Dejah Thoris). Dale spends the entire film a captive; Aura gets more agency — bad girls often do — but she still winds up facing a forced marriage to Vultan, the king of the Hawkmen (and forced marriage clearly means marital rape). I think it’s possible to do that and still be true to Raymond — but I’m not sure it would sell even so. Of course, it only takes one clever filmmaker to prove me wrong …

Art by Alex Raymond. All rights to images remain with current holders.

Leave a comment

Filed under Movies, Writing

Dan Brown, Sandra Bullock and Sweeney Todd: movies and a play

The Da Vinci Code sequel ANGELS AND DEMONS (2009) has David Langdon (Tom Hanks of course) recruited by the Vatican “despite your history of prying into church affairs,” when it appears the Illuminati have planted an anti-matter bomb to wipe out the Vatican during the conclave to pick a new pope (I’m inclined to suggest a double bill of this and Conclave for sheer incongruity). A set up like that should have led to pure, wild entertainment but Dan Brown is too busy teaching us esoteric details about the Vatican, Rome and the Illuminati to go with the flow (some of Michael Crichton’s talkier books have the same problem).

Plus, of course, the details are wrong. The real Illuminati were a branch of the Freemasons founded in 1776 in Bavaria, repressed by the state a few years later; here they’re a much older organization, a brotherhood of scientists driven underground by the Vatican’s persecution. Given the real Illuminati have been massively transformed in pop culture and political paranoia to something far more ominous, ignoring the reality (for that matter it doesn’t have much in common with the paranoid fantasy Illuminati) shouldn’t be a sticking point — but I don’t like the movie so I’m less forgiving than I might be. With Stellan Skarsgaard as a cop and Ewan McGregor as a priest. “Is it possible the Illuminati could have infiltrated the Swiss guard?”

Memory says I did like THE NET (1995) the first time I saw it, due my huge crush on Sandra Bullock; rewatching now, she can’t save such a slow, predictable thriller. Bullock plays Angela, a cybersecurity whiz who lives a high-tech, solitary lifestyle. Doesn’t hang out with her neighbors. Keeps her mother, who’s sliding into dementia, in a home (I’ve seen people deal with family members who have Alzheimer’s and I do not find Angela’s decision unreasonable). Her last serious relationship was with her married therapist, Dr. Alan Chapman (Dennis Miller). When she wants pizza — well, why go to a restaurant when you can order it online!

From Angela’s perspective it’s a good life … that comes crashing down when she unwittingly acquires the McGuffin, a software program that a sinister conspiracy definitely doesn’t want a security expert looking at. On vacation she meets Jack (Jeremy Bentham) who’s really into her … because he’s working for the conspiracy! This will come as a shock to no-one, except Angela. Bentham does a good job as a hit-man who might genuinely like Angela (or he might be lying) though not so much he won’t kill her. When he fails, the conspiracy goes to Plan B, rewriting Angela’s digital records so she’s now in police records as a petty crook and scam artist. An imposter takes Angela’s own identity, sells off her house, drains her bank accounts — and as she lives online, nobody knows it isn’t her.

It’s a shame I had to watch this without TYG, as she’d have some thoughts on the 1990s tech, like the crude avatars of Angela’s online friends in chat rooms. As a thriller, this is formulaic though I do find it interesting as a high-tech version of a concept — having your identity erased — that goes back much further (Twilight Zone: Person or Persons Unknown is one example). “She’s not running — she’s going in there to use a computer!

Finally got around to watching my brother in a production of SWEENEY TODD, the story of a barber transported (shipped overseas as a convict) for crimes he didn’t commit so that a lecherous judge could plays sexual predator to the barber’s wife. Now he’s back, out for revenge, but until he can get it, he winds up working in partnership with a local baker: he kills his customers, she bakes them into pies. My brother plays a rival barber who makes the mistake of blackmailing Mr. Todd.

The cannibalism dominates my memory of the show so I was surprised it doesn’t start until the show is half over. It shows Sondheim’s skill as a playwright that the drama of the first half kept me engaged, instead of waiting for the blood and gore to kick in. I’m inclined to suggest a double bill with Little Shop of Horrors as another story of a struggling business that gets involved in anthropophagy. “There’s a hole in the world like a great black pit/And it’s filled with people who are filled with shit.”

All rights to images remain with current holders.

1 Comment

Filed under Movies

One book, one movie: Dr. Lao and his seven faces

Charles Finney’s 1935 THE CIRCUS OF DR. LAO is one weird book. And I love the cover of my edition (wish I knew the artist)

Abalone, Arizona is a small, dull, dusty desert town. First the newspaper has a big ad announcing the coming of the circus, then it shows up. In small towns back then, that’s always exciting, but townies who gather to watch are underwhelmed — three wagons, that’s all? One of them with a horse that has a fake horn on its head, one of the wagon-drivers has horns on his head and plays a syrinx, there’s a dog painted green, a little old Chinese man and a furry Something/Someone in one of the cages — is it a bear? Or maybe a Russian? Lao himself can shift from pidgin English to standard English at will.

Despite the small procession into town, there’s a full circus with sideshow exhibits and a big tent when Lao opens his show that night (memory suggests a circus setting up magically this way is a common trope but I can’t swear to it). We have a sea serpent engaging in intellectual conversation about its life history. Medusa, carefully shielded so she’s only visible in a mirror (as you might guess, someone’s going to look closer …). The satyr sexually liberates a prim young woman. Two drunk college students cause trouble. Apollonius the seer gives a middle-aged woman a bleak prophecy: she won’t find love, nothing will change, nothing will improve, she’ll simply fade away, losing hope, and then she’ll die (it’s a strikingly sad moment). A sorcerer resurrects a dead man, who runs off immediately — he has important business! Almost all of which the locals treat with complete phlegmatism, no more excited than if they’d seen a tattooed man or the like. Faced with wonders they don’t find it that wondrous. Apollonius’ prophecy feels like it could apply to the entire town.

It’s an odd but fascinating story. No real plot, just a series of incidents. No real explanation of anything. The book concludes with a Cast of Characters list including details about people who were little more than walk-ons, or were mentioned but never appeared, plus a list of unanswered questions — was it a Russian or a bear? What business did the dead man have? The end result is not everyone’s cup of tea; I have no memory what I made of it when I read it in college, other than “that’s weird.” In its own way it’s brilliant. That said, we have a couple of racial epithets dropped into casual conversation and the satyr committing sexual assault; if those are unacceptable, well now you know.

I think such a plotless novel is unfilmable so it’s no surprise when they did film it, Charles Beaumont’s script for THE 7 FACES OF DR. LAO (1964) gives it a plot to hold everything together (the great George Pal directed it). A skilled fantasy writer and Twilght Zone scriptwriter, Beaumont gives it a Twilight Zone quality — Lao (Tony Randall in yellowface) shows up and transforms everyone’s lives for the better the same way Professor Fate saves Denton in the episode Mr. Denton on Doomsday. Though it also resembles the 1962 film musical The Music Man: like Harold Hill, Dr. Lao is a traveling trickster who revives the lives of everyone in town, including inspiring a prim librarian to find love (this does make Lao the equivalent of a “magical Negro”).

This version of Abalone is a dying town and everyone knows it. Cynical Stark (Arthur O’Connell) has offered to buy everyone out so they can leave and start over; newspaper publisher Ed Cunningham (John Ericson) is pushing his neighbors to say no. He’s also pushing widowed librarian Angela Benedict (Barbara Eden) to say yes to a date, without any luck.

Enter Lao and his circus. His satyr (Randall — the “seven faces” means he plays seven roles) loosens Angela up (not quite as rapey as the book scene), the serpent mocks Stark, Apollonius (Randall again) makes his bleak prophecy. Stark’s thugs harass everyone opposing him; somehow Lao neutralizes them.

The end result, alas, lacks the sophistication of a good Twilight Zone episode; it feels more like kidvid (Lao does spend a lot of time with Angela’s young son, who’s fascinated by him). The performances are competent but not stellar. Randall playing seven roles doesn’t add much, though “actor plays multiple roles” has its own appeal. It has some charm, but I think there’s a better unfaithful adaptation they could have made. “Every time I bet on weakness, corruption, and fallibility, I want to lose — but I always win.”

All rights to images remain with current holders.

Leave a comment

Filed under Movies, Reading

Atlantis rises — and so does Superman! Movies and TV

GOLDEN NINJA (1966) has an astronomer who’s discovered the rogue planet Icarus is hurtling towards Earth join a UN team that’s working to destroy the planet with a super-laser. Too bad the sinister Noza’s out to steal the laser and bring about Earth’s death — who can save us now?

Well, as the title tells us, it’s the Golden Ninja, a laughing gold-lame clad superhero who rises from his tomb in ancient Atlantis to battle Noza. This silly but engaging movie was originally Golden Bat, which makes more sense (he has a bat familiar he uses at key moments) — but then again, I can’t imagine anyone watching this movie was worried about the plausibility of Atlantean ninjas. I am, however, bothered that Noza’s weird outfit makes him resemble a four-eyed pantomime horse. “Humans don’t belong in this universe — this universe exists only for me, Noza!”

In BLACK PANTHER: Wakanda Forever (2022), the MU’s Atlantis is transformed into Talokan, an underwater haven where an indigenous Central American tribe fled (by means of a water-breathing potion) to escape Spanish colonialism. Now, though, American attempts to mine vibranium from the ocean floor threaten their existence so their leader, Namor (Tenoch Huerta) invites Wakandan Queen Ramonda (Angela Bassett) and Shuri (Letitia Wright) into an alliance against the surface world.

Okay, he actually demands one, along with ordering Shuri to capture Riri Williams (Dominique Thorne), the teen genius whose invention makes the mining operation possible. Namor blames Wakanda because their refusal to share their vibranium with the world is what drove America to go looking. And if they refuse? “Our warriors are as numerous as the blades of grass in your kingdom.”

This Black Panther sequel had the challenge of the MCU T’Challa (Chadwick Boseman) having died after the first film; one of the plot threads is Shuri dealing with her grief, and her ambivalence over stepping into the hereditary role. I don’t think it met the challenge. Part of the problem is that it’s got a lot to do: Shuri’s grief, more geopolitical conflicts, introducing Namor and Talokan, setting up Riri for her Ironheart series on TV, plus Wakanda vs. Talokan action scenes. The result is a 2hr 40 minute movie and while there’s no shortage of plot, there’s not enough drama for me. Fitting Namor into the Killmonger role — the voice of someone who’s suffered from colonialism and wants Wakanda to Do Something — didn’t work, and neither did Namor. For me, the essence of Namor has always been his arrogance and this version didn’t have that; while he’s imperious and makes demands he comes off more as a leader making tough choices. And while I do love them keeping Namor’s ridiculous ankle wings, why would a Mesoamerican merman say Namor’s catchphrase of Imperius Rex? “There is an entire YouTube channel dedicated to sightings of me.”

By contrast, the third season of MY ADVENTURES WITH SUPERMAN (S1 review here; S2 review here) succeeds admirably. The plot threads include Jimmy insisting he and Kara date other people (he’s convinced she only likes him because she hasn’t seen what other Earth boys are like); Clark talking marriage and Lois freaking out; their kids arriving from the dystopian future to change it; Luthor unleashing a superhuman of his own (spoiler: doesn’t go well); and Clark losing his powers for much of the season. I particularly love a scene in which the depowered Clark gets between a killer and some kids, takes a bullet stopping him and then beats himself up — those kids almost got killed because he didn’t have his powers! Of course he did save them but he just takes doing the right thing as a given and doesn’t consider it. I look forward to S2.“Your fear is a weakness — mine is a weapon.”

Cover by Curt Swan, all rights to images remain with current holders.

Leave a comment

Filed under Movies, TV

Adventures in Italy, Argentina and Eternia: Movies

GUILLERMO DEL TORO’S PINOCCHIO (2019) is a wildly entertaining film that takes elements of the original novel and the Disney movie and throws in Italian fascism. It’s the brink of WW II and Gepetto is grieving his son’s death in an earlier bombing raid. When he carves a puppet boy out of a tree his son once planted, the Blue Fairy (Tilda Swinton) brings Pinocchio (Gregory Mann) to life which leads to inevitable trouble as he tries to make sense of life, dies and returns, gets drafted into the army (Ron Perlman plays the local fascist leader) and struggles to find his dad with the help of a somewhat self-centered Crickett (Ewan MacGregor). Odd, grotesque — but it works well. With Christopher Waltz as a conniving showman and Cate Blanchett as his monkey sidekick. “Sometimes fathers feel despair like anyone else.”

With WW II cutting Hollywood off from the European market, 20th Century Fox hoped DOWN ARGENTINE WAY (1940) would sell well enough in Latin America to compensate. This stars Don Ameche as the son of an Argentine horse-breeder who strikes up a romance with American horse-loving socialite Betty Grable; alas, it seems Ameche’s father has a bitter feud with Grable’s and declares his is a love that cannot be. This successfully launched Grable as a musical star though I’m damned if I can see why — she’s way too bland an actor for my taste (though tough enough offstage to stare down the studio head when he demanded to sleep with her).

However my primary reason was that the Nicholas Brothers, the amazing black tap dancers, appear here doing a solo number, which was typical for their film careers (easier to cut for Southern markets). I’m a fan of theirs and they are spectacular here, more than worth watching. The supporting cast includes Carmen Miranda as herself and J. Carroll Naish as a gigolo — oh, my mistake, he’s a Tour Guide, got that? “If he ever looks into my eyes again, I’ll show him a storm rising over the pampas.”

I was never a fan of the original He-Man series but I had some free time and Amazon was streaming MASTERS OF THE UNIVERSE (2026) free and Camestros Felapton thought it was worth seeing, so …

A sneak attack by Jared Leto’s Skeletor forces Prince Adam (Nicholas Galitzine) to flee to our world where he loses the Power Sword. As an adult he’s stuck living as an HR worker, searching for the sword and convincing everyone around him he’s a borderline nutjob. Worse, when he finds the sword, the movie’s threat level ratchets upwards ..

This feels like it’s shooting for a Guardians of the Galaxy-type balance between comedy and adventure and it does reasonably well. The cast includes Idris Elba as a drunken, washed-up Man At Arms, Alison Brie as Evil-Lyn, James Purefoy as Adam’s dad, Kirsten Wiig as the voice of Roboto, Morina Baccarin as the Sorceress and Camilla Mendes as Teela. “No match for the Netflix She-Ra (though “Force Commander Adora” does appear in an endbit), but fun enough. “There is no good left in me for you to find.

All rights to images remain with current holders.

Leave a comment

Filed under Movies

Mundus vult decipit: the world loves to be deceived

Mundus vult decipit was the motto of Manuel of Poictesme in James Branch Cabell’s Figures of Earth. It reflects that Cabell’s heroes are frequently liars and con artists, and Cabell’s general cynicism about everything. But it’s also got an element of truth to it.

In its ugliest form, we have people embracing patriarchy and racism. As I’ve written before, patriarchy makes people stupid. It’s a lie that tells men they’re entitled to have a woman provide them with sex and clean up after them. The same appealing (to some people) lie ripples through society in other ways. Shitbag misogynists such as preacher John Piper insist women’s submission is justified because her man will protect her; even if she can protect herself, he should do it. And if the moment he need to protect her never comes? Well, he was willing to do it, so her life of submission and housekeeping, day in and day out, is completely justified. And if the husband, instead of protecting her, is abusive, Piper is very concerned … that she not defy her husband by calling the cops unless the church gives her permission.

Then there’s Joel Webbon, hatemongering misogynist racist preacher who claimed once that MLK and the major anti-slavery abolitionists are burning in hell. He offers no evidence for this — there is none — but for people who want to believe in white supremacy, that might be comforting. More generally we have the idea there is a divinely ordained hierarchy and God has assigned us our place in it . Regardless of whether you earn a place on merit, “He made them high and lowly” tells you you still deserve it. That’s very comforting to people with privilege or unearned advantages: questioning them is questioning God!

Then there’s the ongoing anti-vax movement. I’ve seen occasional interviews where the parent of an autistic kid says they support the Toddler and RKF Jr. because the medical establishment refused to accept the kid’s mental state was caused by vaccines. Well, that’s because it wasn’t. There’s no link, no connection. But the parent wants to believe there’s a simple explanation and so they swallow the first one offered. And as I noted a week ago, so has the Toddler.

Or consider the endless claims that forcing women into tradwife homes isn’t sexist: It’s what women secretly crave. Which is the tip of a whole iceberg of lies: “We’re supposed to buy that the woman who makes chewing gum from scratch while her husband cosplays as James Dean wasn’t trying to capitalize on the tradwife trend? That Miller throwing hot water on his wife was just “horseplay”? That a desperate mother who called ER after ER and saw doctor after doctor was planning on killing her children? Really?

For decades, American mothers have been expected to eat lies with a smile—swallowing any anger and disappointment, and surviving on platitudes about our job being the most important in the world. (So important that we don’t need pesky paid parental leave, affordable child care, or the equitable division of domestic labor.) Still, for a minute there, it seemed like conservatives might just get the cultural shift they wanted: between the backlash to “girlboss feminism,” the rise of MAHA moms, and the Covid-era exodus of women from the workforce—the tradwife movement was being carefully positioned as something American moms might just want.”

Then you have Katie Souza, ex-con and former meth distributor, who’s reinvented herself as a preacher exposing the covert alien conspiracy to harvest women’s eggs and make alien hybrids. Plus “she said that she had to break a family curse connected to Adolf Hitler’s attempt to harness the power of a Satanic altar.” As Fred Clark says at the link there’s not an atom of evidence for any of this but plenty of people are apparently willing to believe her — after all, it’s such a cool story. The same, I think is true of fake Satanist Mike Warnke. It’s not just that much of his life story was obvious bullshit (the Freedom Riders were a Kennedy administration thing so he couldn’t have been one when at college in the late 1960s) but if, as he claimed, he’d participated in Satanic human sacrifices, he’s an accessory to murder. I’m pretty sure if his conservative Christian audiences believed him they’d have called the cops — but they told themselves they did.

Which shows why this stuff isn’t merely laughable: during the 1980s Satanic panic, prosecutors cited Warnke’s stories as proof that Satanic cults could indeed be sacrificing children. They weren’t. A number of people went to jail based on the lie, though. The Qanon nonsense follows the same path. Only it’s not just about the cool story, it’s about the fantasy that if Democrats are pedophiles, Republicans are heroes for fighting them.

There are multiple reasons people fall for nonsense. There are multiple reasons people spread them: fame, political advantage, money (and in the current political environment add one more: to keep President Crybaby happy). Underpinning much of this is one fundamental defense against reality: “We just have different facts” or the like. We do not, however, have different facts. While there are many cases where we might debate over the facts or how to interpret them, the examples I’m listing here are not among them. There is no vast network of Satanic ritual abuse, there are no aliens creating hybrids, vaccines work, and nothing justifies a hierarchy that ranks members of one race or gender or ethnicity above others.

In the words of George Orwell, “”The point is that we are all capable of believing things which we know to be untrue, and then, when we are finally proved wrong, impudently twisting the facts so as to show that we were right. Intellectually, it is possible to carry on this process for an indefinite time: the only check on it is that sooner or later a false belief bumps up against solid reality, usually on a battlefield.” And for some people, not even that will work.

Leave a comment

Filed under Movies

The men of New York: movies

Michael Cera is a Big Apple journalist in PERSON TO PERSON (2017) though it’s the kind of quirky indie where his plotline — working with a cute colleague on a story in hopes he can get her into bed — is only one strand of the story, alongside a record collector hunting a rare Charlie Parker disc and a teenage girl trying to figure out her sexuality (“I’m a lesbian … mostly … I think.”). This is nominally tied together by taking place on a single day in New York but more connection between the plot threads would really have helped. Or maybe having one upbeat protagonist instead of everyone being glum or nervous. The end result is competent but listless. “It’s not a good-looking penis because a good-looking penis does not exist.”


BOYS NIGHT OUT (1962) has married Howard Duff and Tony Randall nag divorced buddy James Garner into a plan to rent a swinging bachelor pad (it’s interesting to see how Hollywood imagined a swanky apartment back then) and then install a mistress they can each visit one night a week. By sheer luck, Kim Novak stumbles into this set-up and decides to let them think she’s a sex worker as it will provide invaluable research for her thesis on “Adolescent Sex Fantasies of the Suburban Male” (“This isn’t what they want, it’s what they’ve been told they’re supposed to want.”). Garner is horrified by all this, yet at the same time, Novak’s character is so cute … can he save her from this life of sin?

This worked better when I didn’t know all the twists and Novak’s too stiff to be funny; nevertheless, I enjoyed rewatching this one. It’s fluff, but it’s entertaining fluff. The cast includes Jessie Royce Landis as Garner’s disapproving mom, Oscar Homolka as Novak’s thesis adviser, William Bendix as a barkeep and Fred Allen as a gumshoe. “When it comes to sex, men can’t keep from lying. Women can’t keep from telling the truth.”


I’ve never liked Marvel’s decision to retcon out the Peter/MJ marriage in the One More Day/Brand New Day story arcs and had similar feelings about the MCU’s Peter Parker (Tom Holland) having to erase his relationship to MJ (Zendaya) in Spider-Man: No Way Home. Nevertheless SPIDER-MAN: Brand New Day (2026) makes excellent entertainment.

It’s been five years since the previous movie and the same amount of time has elapsed in the MCU. Spidey has become a Big Apple legend, taking down Scorpion, Tombstone and the Hand and forming alliances with the Punisher (Frank Bernthal) and Inspector Jean DeWolff (Liza Colon Zayas). As Peter Parker he’s alone, unable to rebuild his life after losing MJ and Aunt May. DeWolff warns him he needs to get a life instead of fighting crime 24/7 but what else does he have to do? Then a mysterious body-jumping adversary begins using random people to coordinate an attack on Damage Control, here something equivalent to DC Comics’ DEO. How does he stop someone who can be anyone, or distract him by making their victims jump off a ledge? And what about his own powers, which are spiraling out of control as he stresses out (I half-wondered if he’d briefly become the eight-limbed figure seen on Gil Kane’s cover here, but no)? Can Bruce Banner (Mark Ruffalo) give Peter the advice he needs on controlling a dangerous alter ego?

The movie isn’t perfect. There’s one twist that’s not even slightly shocking and the mind-controller gets too big a pass on some of her actions. Peter has an apartment, food and a state of the art computer system but we never learn where he gets the money. Overall, though, an impressive job that does as good a job as possible not burdening new viewers with too much continuity. “Mind-control? Yeah, governments do that a lot — particularly the French.”

Once again TYG and I caught the annual CAT VIDEO FEST (2026) at the local Carolina Theatre and enjoyed shots of cats climbing and failing, wriggling through holes, stubbornly making things more complicated or a quartet of stray kittens getting caught by a rescuer. As usual nothing that we couldn’t find on the Internet and a few too many animated shorts this time around. Still, the second most fun film of the week.

All rights to images remain with current holders. The one Spider-Man panel is by John Romita.

Leave a comment

Filed under Movies

Fallen women on screen

While at ConGregate last month, I had a quiet stretch in my room in the early morning and wound up watching GABY (1956), which though I didn’t know it was a remake of Waterloo Bridge.

Leslie Caron plays the eponymous protagonist, a French dancer who fled the Nazi occupation to London after the death of her parents. John Kerr is Greg, an American GI who’s never met anyone so elegant and sophisticated and falls for her like a ton of bricks. Before long, vows are exchanged; I assumed that having married in haste, the drama would come when they repented at leisure (Gaby’s parents are alive and Vichy or something equally shocking). Wrong. After Greg apparently dies on D-Day Gaby, currently unemployed, turns to sex work to support herself. When Greg returns, injured but alive, Gaby is to guilty to live and walks out into a German V-2 rocket bombardment.

Admittedly I wasn’t paying close attention to the film — it’s not that gripping and I was doing other stuff during parts of it — but I was surprised to realize Gaby was selling her body rather than just sleeping around. Maybe it was me not paying attention but it’s possible the Production Code forced the filmmakers to keep things much less obvious than in Waterloo Bridge, especially as Gaby doesn’t pay for her life for her sins. Instead Greg tells her that war is hell, people do terrible things — but it’s over now, let’s put it behind us. “I thought all Americans were divorced?”

My serial watching of Stephen Soderbergh came to a halt when I couldn’t find 2009’s THE GIRLFRIEND EXPERIENCE anywhere streaming. Finally, though, I ordered the DVD. This is one of Soderbergh’s art films (as opposed to crowd-pleasers like Ocean’s Eleven), with porn star Sasha Grey playing a sex worker dealing with men ranging from her slightly jealous live-in boyfriend to a client who might be more to various clients who want to give her advise on investing or better design for her website. As Roger Ebert says, most of them are buying sex but what they really want is to be told how smart they are.

The book Marked Women has a whole chapter on “prostitute as businesswoman” films. These include left-wing critiques showing how capitalism corrupts even sexual relations and those that show sex work is simply work, a job like any other. This film definitely fits the second category: Grey’s character is a businesswoman and her business is considerably safer because she runs it through the Internet (something Samantha Cole brings up in How Sex Changed the Internet and the Internet Changed Sex). Overall, I liked the film, though while I agree with Soderbergh not diving deep into her motives (as he says on the commentary track, it’s too easy to go cliched), the result is that it never gets below the surface of her life. “I’ve told them I can’t make the junket to Vegas.”

All rights to images remain with current holders.

Leave a comment

Filed under Movies