Tag Archives: Thom Tillis

Update on NC Senator Thom Tillis

Despite his record of supporting bad alternatives to Obamacare, Tillis is enthusiastically claiming  the Republican Protect Act will shield people with pre-existing conditions from being charged higher premiums. See, he cares!

Even if true, is a much, much worse deal for most of us than the post-ACA status quo. This fits with most of the Republican alternatives. And while the bill says a plan may not discriminate between people based on pre-existing conditions, the LA Times says there’s nothing to stop an insurer from offering two tiers of plans, one for healthy young people, and a pricier one for older sicker people. Which fits, too; a stock conservative solution is that if we don’t let states set minimum standards for insurance, the free market will fix everything (they are amazingly flexible on “state’s rights” when it gets in the way of big business, aren’t they?

Here’s the text, if you’re curious.

Given Tillis lies like a rug, I am not inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt.

Leave a comment

Filed under economics, Politics

Who could have predicted Sen. Thom Tillis would ring his hands and do nothing? Everyone.

Prior to the vote on Trump’s emergency build-a-wall declaration, NC Sen. Thom Tillis declared the declaration was unacceptable and he was going to vote against it. Guess what? He voted for it.

Lance Mannion says GOP donors intimidated Tillis by threatening to fund a primary challenger for him next year. I frankly wonder if Tillis ever meant to go against Trump or if he was simply positioning himself as a Sensible Moderate Conservative in case Trump goes down. Sure, he may have voted for Trump’s emergency powers, but he was forced! He felt really bad about it! Sorry, senator, but as Thomas Jefferson once said, it’s in our actions and not our words that our hearts are read (and Tillis’ words are frequently lies). Sen. Richard Burr, didn’t even go as far as Tilis: he was an enthusiastic Trump supporter, as usual.

Utah approves hate-crime protection for gays, because the bill throws in protection for Trump supporters.

People aren’t poor because they lack intelligence, their intelligence goes down because poverty drains it.

Anti-semitism keeps surfacing on the right: online comic Owen Benjamin claims Hitler didn’t hate Jews, “he hated filth and was trying to clean it up.”

The right continues to demonize Muslims. Fred Clark looks at the general raving paranoia on the right (they’re going to put Christians in concentration camps and concludes people believe it (whether it is a false-flag shooting, a pedophile slave ring because they choose to believe it: “They purport to be fearful and concerned and upset by this news of evil “Momo” messengers preying on children. If that claim was made in good faith, then these folks would be relieved to learn that it’s all a hoax and a lie. “Oh, thank God,” they would say. But they do not say this and they are not relieved, because they preferred to go on pretending that it was true. Confronted with the evidence of the hoax they had chosen to avoid glancing at, they get angry and resentful to have it pointed out to them.”

I suspect the same sort of logic fuels the fantasy attacks like New Zealand’s are false flags by the left.

And, of course, fantasies about the other side being evil lead into calls to kill them first. Or believing that

So what do the Bible verses about obeying the king and rendering unto Caesar mean in the 21st century? A good discussion here.

Last year Florida voters restored voting rights to convicted criminals. Republicans try to prevent them voting anyway.

I’ve written before about Trump cabinet member and former prosecutor Alexander Acosta breaking Florida law to cut a plea bargain deal with accused child molester Jeffrey Epstein. Now it turns out that as Epstein’s guilty plea involved sex with a sixteen year old, he doesn’t have to register as a sexual predator.

Howard Schulz continues fantasizing he’s the Trump-killer candidate. And some Dems fantasize, just like Obama did, that they can win over Republicans.

In the wake of the recent college recruiting scandal, an insider discusses how often they had to admit mediocre rich kids over the talented poor to land that sweet, sweet full tuition payment.

Five years for animal cruelty? I’m good with it.


Filed under Politics

If you’re a teenage rapist, senators Thom Tillis and Richard Burr have your back

Which is to say like every other Republican senator but Murkowski they voted yes, for Brett Kavanaugh, accused rapist, to sit on the Supreme Court. I’m sure they’d default to the FBI investigation finding nothing, ignoring that the investigation was sharply restricted, because (according to one of the White House lawyers) a full investigation “would be potentially disastrous for Judge Kavanaugh’s chances of confirmation to the Supreme Court.” So several people who might have been a problem for Kavanaugh weren’t contacted. Heck, they didn’t even contact the two guys who supposedly told Senate Republicans that they might be Ford’s attacker. Why it’s almost like there’s no proof they even existed!

The truncated investigation we got is enough for the right wing to claim vindication, which is all it was meant for.

But I’m with slacktivist Fred Clark: “Kavanaugh’s denials expose the specific shape of what he’s denying like a cloth draped over a statue.”

Multiple prominent Republicans such as Franklin Graham have declared even if Kavanaugh did it, it doesn’t matter. 48 percent of evangelical voters also think it doesn’t matter. Neither does this guy. Not when they have the chance to shut down abortion, inflict pain on gays and funnel more taxpayers’ dollars to religon. If that means telling 17 year olds who rape 15 year olds “bygones! you get a mulligan!” (and we’re not even talking about the other two allegations against Kavanaugh), hey, no big! It’s worth it to get a reliable right-wing judge on the court. And I’ve seen very little blowback from other conservatives insisting that yes, it would matter (there are exceptions).

And Trump has mocked the Dems for being wimpy sissies who dumped Al Franken for a bit of groping.

I’ve had right-wing friends sharing the rape-apologist meme that Christine Ford was too ugly to be raped. They are now blocked.

A Florida Catholic, Donald Sanborn says we should believe Kavanaugh because he’s superior to Ford. Sanborn calls himself a bishop, but he is not, in fact part of the Catholic hierarchy.

Lili Loofbourow points out the absurdity of “the three women were conspiring against him” — what kind of dumb-ass conspirators would report public assaults rather than somewhere nobody else can be a witness for Kavanaugh?  She also suggests the public nature is the point — it’s how Kavanaugh and his bros bonded. Hey, for some guys drinking and brawling is what makes them awesome! For others, including President Shit-Gibbon, the cruelty of humiliating women (or blacks or gays) is just too much fun.

The network of “information terrorists” involved in Gamergate and Pizzagate were also active supporting Kavanaugh. Kavanaugh’s very sexist buddy Mark Judge sided with GamerGate.

Along with “those other two guys attacked Ford” the right-wing has also pushed “Ford was hypnotized” to lie as a defense. Or the classic, claiming other accusers were sluts.

Senator Cory Booker groped a young woman as a teenager, but there are significant differences: he went public of his own volition, acknowledged he was wrong, and says he behaved better after that. Which noted at the link doesn’t make it okay, but it’s not comparable to Kavanaugh.

Some conservatives did object to appointing Kavanaugh.

In other related thoughts:

Women talk about what they’d do at night if men were kept indoors.

Paige Patterson, a Southern Baptist leader who told abused women to stay with their husbands, is teaching a class on ethics.

The religious right talks a lot about how abortion is an American Holocaust, millions dead! But even though reliable contraception reduces abortion rates, they oppose it.


Filed under Undead sexist cliches

Fewer bad things, not more

So my odious Senator, Thom Tillis, recently sent out an email to voters about how he’s fighting on behalf of Andrew Brunson, an Americn missionary detained in Turkey for supposedly being part of a secret conspiracy to create a Khurdish Christian state. He’s been held close to two years and Turkey’s authoritarian government is holding him based on secret testimony in closed court hearings.

From what I’ve read of the case, it sounds like Tillis is on the side of the angels in this one. Which is kind of ironic, or hypocritical as Tillis also voted to confirm CIA torturer Gina Haspel as CIA director. Holding Americans unfairly? Bad. America torturing other people? No big. Similarly, some of the interviewees quoted at the first link above spoke about how ““As an American, the presenting of this type of ‘evidence’ in a courtroom by secret witnesses is alien” — but it isn’t since 9/11. Heck, W’s administration asserted it could hold people, including Americans, without presenting any evidence in a courtroom, just on the president’s say-so. And I doubt Senators Tillis or Richard Burr would protest. (Tillis objected to Obama releasing Guantanamo detainees).

The thing is, that doesn’t make Tillis wrong in the Brunson case. Having Americans unfairly detained or tortured doesn’t somehow balance out America detaining other people. It isn’t justice — okay maybe if someone like Haspel or Dick Cheney were the victim it would have a poetic justice, but even that’s a stretch. What balances the scales is America not torturing or arbitrarily detaining people. The same way that wanting cops to treat blacks and whites equally doesn’t mean I want cops gunning down unarmed whites. It means that blacks shouldn’t be gunned down either (as this story notes, cops have no trouble notwhite man with a gun shooting a , wearing a bulletproof vest).

I remember one of my FB friends (his posts are now blocked) argued after the 2016 election that Dems had no grounds to complain about Russia interfering with our election because we’ve interfered with elections in other countries for years (I do not, by the way, believe he was arguing in good faith and would have taken that position if the Russians had hacked for Clinton). While true, that doesn’t mean Russian tampering for Trump balances the scales – the goal should be more fair elections, not less.

I admit there are a few circumstances where I’d feel some real schadenfreude if bad things happen to bad people. Paul Ryan has worked to roll back restrictions on banks passed in response to the 2008 financial meltdown. It would be perfectly appropriate if the next time the banks tank the economy, he lost all his money and then had to struggle to find health care (he’s also done his best to gut the ACA). It would be a sort of justice if Tillis, who voted to gut the ACA while insisting he wanted to improve it, had to struggle for health care. But let’s face it, it’s better to live in a country in which everyone, even all the Trump voters who support his efforts to gut ACA, have affordable healthcare available.

As a general rule, the total amount of suffering needs to go down, not up.

1 Comment

Filed under Politics

NC Sen. Thom Tillis lies a lot (and more political links)

I’ve mentioned Tillis’s bullshit statements about the Affordable Care Act and how he’s trying to make insurance more affordable by killing ACA. Now he’s explaining his support for the GOP tax bill is because it “will lead to bigger paychecks for hardworking Americans.” Unless he defines hardworking Americans as “rich people, including myself,” he’s lying again. Sen. Richard Burr voted for the tax monstrosity too, so I’m sure he’d lie about it if he ever responded to my letters.

Not that the rest of the Repubs are much better. Rep. Paul Ryan wants us to know it’s a heartbreaking burden to labor on as Speaker of the House, cutting taxes on himself and fighting so he doesn’t have to pay estate tax. He’s a noble soul who just wants to stay in office long enough to gut Social Security and Medicare (sure, he went to college on Social Security Disability, but he doesn’t need it now, does he?), then retire to be with his family. So tragic.

Equally tragic: The media pretending the Republicans really wanted a better bill.

And then there’s the last minute decision that allows people who set up their businesses as limited liability companies take extra deductions if, like President Shit-Gibbon and Bob Corker, they’re in real estate.

A police officer refuses to believe trans people really suffer higher rates of police violence. A female captain tells the man he’s showing his privilege. The captain gets suspended.

Slacktivist looks at the symbolism and problems of Trump declaring Jerusalem is the capital of Israel. The belief of some religious conservatives that this is good because it helps advance us toward the Apocalypse strikes me as the worst kind of arrogance, a conviction that if they play their cards right they can make the Second Coming happen on their schedule.

An Oklahoma preacher allegedly used his church’s phone number for a prostitution ring he ran.

How Steve Bannon tried to take down Twitter. And in supporting Roy Moore, Bannon seems to have taken down himself. Although right-wing pundits are desperately trying to blame Moore’s defeat on Mitch McConnell instead (or Christians who got unreasonably freaked out by Roy Moore molesting children) Trump, of course, having endorsed Moore now claims he never had much hope for him. And John Rogers of Leverage explains that no, George Soros couldn’t have bused an extra 20,000 fake voters into Alabama.

Reagan declared we should make it harder to vote, something people have to struggle to achieve. Lance Manion points out that the people who advocate this aren’t exactly crossing trackless jungles to deliver their ballots.

Assessing sexual harassment cases when we don’t know the charges.

Rebecca Traister points out the issue in harassment cases isn’t the assault on women’s virtue but the damage to their ability to earn a living.


Filed under economics, Politics, Undead sexist cliches

NC Senators Thom Tillis and Richard Burr vote to give themselves big tax cuts

Sigh. If I’d known the tax bill was coming up early Saturday morning, I’d have called my senators, not that it would have made a difference.

While we don’t know exactly what’s in the bill, we do know it means big tax cuts for the rich. While a lot of press has focused on the donor pressure on Republicans, we should remember they’re rich men themselves: the bill amounts to giving themselves a massive tax cut (both Burr and Tillis are multi-millionaires) and screwing over the rest of us. As a lot of Dem Senators are wealthy too, I’m pleased none of them voted for it (Bob Corker was the lone holdout on the Republican side).

Next up: gutting Social Security and Medicare. Rep. Paul Ryan, who went through college on Social Security disability money his family received is looking forward to making it harder for other people to get the same help.

Jonathan Chait points out that lots of rich people see themselves as Ayn Rand-style superachievers: They’ve earned their wealth! Taking it away in taxes is like what Hitler did to the Jews (spoiler: no, it’s not). It’s a manifestation of the underlying fear that democracy is bad because it allows the poor to vote themselves welfare on the backs of the rich. Just like health coverage is a giveaway for people who don’t care for themselves.

Of course, we’ve never seen that massive poor-dominated Robin Hood take-from-the-rich thing happen; if anything it’s usually the rich sucking from the rest of us. As in this case.

Even if we assume that it’s unfair to raise taxes on the rich, it should be just as unfair to raise taxes on the middle-class or the poor, but the rich have no problems with that. And the conviction that being rich proves they’ve earned it is fallacious. CEO pay, for example, doesn’t track performance. I’ve read multiple accounts over the years of CEOs whose companies enter bankruptcy or see stock prices plummet; the board’s response is to reward the CEO because they did the best they could in a tough time, or to incentivize them to do their difficult job (apparently millions of dollars in pay is not an incentive in itself). Poor people need to suffer more to make them work, but rich people need more rewards.

Nor do their concerns about persecution translate into an enthusiasm for say, putting the people in Wells Fargo’s corrupt fake-accounts scam in jail or holding them accountable (no, that’s interference with business). Nor do they apply the same standards to people like Curt Schilling, the pitcher who took millions in loans from Rhode Island to launch a company but didn’t pay it all back when the company tanked (he did, however, pull his own money out). Schilling still insists (and perhaps believes) he’s not some welfare queen. Nor are they troubled by Trump evading his debts with multiple bankruptcies. And I doubt they’ll do much about Texas Rep. Blake Farenthold using $84,000 of taxpayer money (though apparently legally) to settle a sexual harassment case.

As for Republican voters, Breitbart has just announced We Win, Tax Cuts For All! Voters who rely on Breitbart, Fox News and Info Wars for the truth will never blame Republicans.


Filed under Politics

Perhaps we should call Trumpcare Tillis-care? Burrcare?

In the multiple letters I have written to NC Senators Thom Tillis and Richard Burr I have said, repeatedly, that if they showed some basic decency and didn’t support the various iterations of Trumpcare, I wouldn’t have to rip into them on social media. But they did, so I am. I will give Tillis credit for actually responding to my letters where Burr has remained utterly silent (like a lot of Repubs they’re avoiding constituents). Unfortunately Tillis doesn’t spew anything but bullshit.

He’s made the same arguments in every answering email: Obamacare is on the brink of collapse. Financially it places a strain on lots of individuals who have to obey the individual mandate and buy insurance. “Even some of Obamacare’s strongest supporters have acknowledged that the law has fundamental flaws that must be addressed …”

And that’s certainly true (of course some of those flaws are the result of Republicans refusing to accept the law’s expanded Medicaid option, which would have made healthcare much more affordable for people at the bottom of the economic pyramid). We need more generous subsidies — one of Obama’s biggest mistakes may have been trying to sensibly budget the law rather than just going ahead and budgeting what was needed. It’s not like Republicans give a flying crap about the deficit (Reagan and W both set records for federal red ink) so there’s no reason to treat them as if they do (it’s not like they could have opposed it more than they did).

But none of the bills passed so far would have done that. None of them would have “improved health care outcomes for hardworking Americans by controlling costs and providing access to affordable care” which is what Tillis claims he wants done. Some versions make discrimination against people with pre-existing conditions easier. Millions of people would lose insurance under them, and the most recent bill backed by Lindsey Graham (who admits his ignorance on the topic)and co-written by Rick Santorum would have been disastrous for women’s health.

Tillis and Burr voted for them anyway. Tillis spoke favorably of the Cassidy-Graham proposal. He seems to think if he keeps telling me “obamacare has failed!” I won’t notice that he’s making things worse.

Oh, and Katy Talento, a former advisor to Tillis is reputedly a prime mover in Trump’s budget cutting funds for birth control in favor of teaching the rhythm method. Because even though abortion rates are down and contraceptive use is part of that, stopping the supposed modern-day holocaust of abortion isn’t as important as stopping women having sexwithout consequences!

Here’s more of Trump continuing the Republican war on women. And a profile of Vice President Mike Pence who probably looks at The Handmaid’s Tale and notes all the cool ideas to implement. As I mentioned last week, if Hilary Clinton had become president and refused to meet alone with members of the opposite sex, the right-wing would have had a shit-fit.

Amazing that at this point in Obama’s presidency, the worst attack Fox News could think of was of his eating habits.


Filed under Politics, Undead sexist cliches