Monthly Archives: November 2015

New And column and other links

The new column is on the current furor over the Syrian immigrant menace and how much it resembles past freak-outs over Japanese, Jewish and Catholic immigrants.

•Speaking of which, the Holocaust Museum reminds us that refusing refugees can get them killed.

•Digby takes a closer look at Eric Erickson’s whine about how he’s too scared to go to the movies without a gun. Digby also pokes holes in Erickson’s claim that he’s not afraid of ordinary shooters, it’s only Muslims that are scary. Tell that to people involved in a movie theater argument that elevated to a shooting, a shooting in Tennessee, or the retired cop who killed a man for texting in a movie theater (but had been texting himself). John Scalzi, while not specifically referencing Erickson, suggests being terrified is not a good approach to this crisis, or to life (an FB friend of mine discussed how liberals are all advocating letting people in because they’re acting on feelings—like fear isn’t a feeling?).

•Speaking of guns, Digby also covers a group of armed anti-Muslim activists waving guns outside a mosque while insisting that Muslims are sooo scary it’s not safe to confront them unarmed. I can just imagine the reaction if a bunch of Muslims did this outside a church …

•Right-wing columnist Kurt Schlichter fantasizes about how real men would crush ISIS. Ben Carson thinks we should bring back torture because not using it is just political correctness.

•Antonin Scalia thinks of himself as a strict interpreter of the Constitution. Scott Lemieux shows the holes in his pose.

•McDonalds has settled claims of discrimination against immigrants for $355,000.

•The sugar and corn industries settle a lawsuit over whether high fructose corn syrup can be called “corn sugar.” Somehow when libertarians complain about “frivolous” lawsuits they never mean this kind of B2B four-year legal battle—it’s only frivolous when ordinary people file suits.

•Scott Adams explains that even if he buys a woman dinner, she gets to decide whether they have sex or not, so therefore we live in a matriarchy. And that men are driven to commit terrorist acts partly because they don’t have enough sex (a common view).  As noted at the first link, Adams doesn’t explain what the alternative is to letting the woman decide (but he’s on the record with saying the problem with rape laws is that they make natural male behavior illegal). Nor does he consider that the man can refuse too, and some men, with a given women, may indeed say no (if any date had ever told me “But you agree about the Holocaust, right? The Jews had it coming.” I’m pretty sure I wouldn’t have put out).

•Jennifer Lawrence says a lot of guys act like jerks with her. Men’s rights activists freak out and explain how she has it coming.

•Trump lies about how almost 90 percent of whites who get shot are shot by blacks.

•An FBI informant flirts with an activist and pushes him to organize a terrorist plot. The FBI covers up how much it directed her in manipulating him, so that it would like the target was the real ringleader.

 

1 Comment

Filed under Politics

You can’t go back in time to kill Hitler, so stop saying warhawks were wrong on Iraq!

Needless to say, a post on the Federalist about going back in time to kill Hitler caught my attention. Unsurprisingly, given it was The Federalist (run by Mollie Hemingway, who thinks women who are not her should let men be the boss), it was … flawed.

Author Robert Tracinski explains that New York Times Magazine tweeted a question: if you could go back and kill Hitler as a baby, would you do it? And that bugs Tracinski because:

•It’s not possible outside of SF stories, so the question is a waste of time. Fair enough, though it’s not as if any magazine or paper doesn’t publish it’s share of fluffy pieces. Heck that’s the nature of twitter, to toss out questions like that.

And it’s not actually that daft a question. Even given it’s a hypothetical, it can be a way to explore perfectly good ethical questions (is one life for millions valid? How much of the Holocaust was Hitler, how much Germany?). And it’s not as if hypotheticals are alien to human discourse.

•You’d be killing a baby. By definition, that’s immoral. Again, a fair point. It’s one of the poles in the debate. No argument there.

•Saying you’d go back and kill Hitler is just a way to feel smug and superior, like all those people who say Tracinski (an Iraq war supporter) was wrong: “Isn’t the assumption behind the baby Hitler example precisely the sort of thing we love to hear — that if only someone as enlightened as me had been around back then, every bad consequences could have been avoided, and universal peace and love would reign?”

Umm, no. As Tracinski seemed to realize up to this point in the article, the hypothetical is not “would you have stopped Hitler if you’d been FDR or Chamberlain?” (though some people have said yes they would, like the right-wing pundit Walter Williams), it’s what you’d do if you time-traveled. As Bud Foote has pointed out, the time-traveler is automatically in a different class from the people in that time, because he has knowledge they don’t. She is more enlightened, just as psychics and prophets are more enlightened about what’s to come.

Continuing to break er, fresh ground on this topic, Tracinski argues the question for liberals would be “Would it be right to kill Jefferson?” because he was a slave-owner so obviously we think he deserves to die. Evidence? None (though he argues that calls to take Jefferson’s name off institutions is exactly the same thing) but I’m sure the straw-man liberals he argues with in his head were very voluble on the point.

Tracinski then goes on to complain—and I suspect this is the real issue—that the Killing Hitler question is exactly like asking politicians whether they’d have invaded Iraq knowing what we know now. I agree this is a flawed question because it implies the invasion made logical sense at the time despite the lack of any evidence Saddam was allied with Al Qaeda or had a WMD program. Tracinski however, seems to think it’s a bad question because it implies we shouldn’t have gone to war (his preferred solution is that we use future knowledge to do a better job invading Iraq—not to, say, find Osama bin Laden and avoid the war altogether), and that implies he and other war supporters were wrong (when it’s obviously Obama who screwed up what was a glorious winning strategy). In short, the Megan McArdle approach: if you were dead wrong about a war that demolished a country, cost thousands of lives and wasted billions of dollars, it’s unfair to criticize you because nobody could have done better… even though multiple people called the outcome.

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Now and Then We Time Travel, Politics

Graphic novels and books (#SFWApro)

DELILAH DIRK AND THE TURKISH LIEUTENANT by Tony Cliff is a fun historical romp set in 1802, in which Erdomoglu, the title’s Turkish lieutenant, finds himself dragged out of his quiet life and into the wake of Delilah, an English female swashbuckler and thief. This was quite entertaining, with good characters in the lead.

BATGIRL: Batgirl of Burnside by Cameron Stewart and Babs Tarr is a very self-consciously contemporary take on Batgirl, giving us a Barbara Gordon who texts, struggles with grad school, wears Doc Martens and engages in drunken makeout sessions. Much to my surprise, I really enjoyed it—this has a light-hearted tone that makes it different from most of DC’s current crop (though it’s not actually that far from Bronze Age Spider-Man, except with less angst). On the other hand, Stewart’s plotting is weak, the prime example being defeating the villain with a recycled 40 year-old Star Trek cliche, and Babs still worked better as Oracle. Still, I did like it, though I have no idea if it’s as hip as it thinks (maybe if I were Babs’ age I’d find this just as unrealistic as Silver Age Teen Titans teen slang).

aquaman32SHOWCASE PRESENTS AQUAMAN Vol. 3 (cover by Nick Cardy, all rights to current holder) gives me almost a complete run of the Silver Age Aquaman (I have the next dozen issues or so reprinted elseewhere) which despite all the jokes the Sea King gets, I’m quite happy to have. This collection makes Aquaman’s wife Mera (the first super-hero marriage of the sixties, followed by the first super-hero baby) one of the stronger women of the Silver Age, as she gets to fight alongside him in a lot of adventures. Writer Bob Haney introduces a string of super-villains to pep up Aquaman’s previously non-existent Rogue’s Gallery—Black Manta, Ocean Master, the Huntress, the Awesome Threesome, Ogre, the alien city of Necrus, though almost none of them returned (I will say by the way that Haney’s Ocean Master comes off a lot more interesting and human than most later writers treated him). I can’t help noticing that the next-to-last story in the book shoves Mera unconvincingly off-stage (a silly and implausible spat), followed by a multi-part story where Aquaman’s searching for his vanished wife. Given that Dick Giordano took over as editor around this time, I wonder if he just didn’t like Aquaman as a married guy?

Switching to novels, ENCHANTED APRIL by Elizabeth von Arnam has a worn-out housewife in the 1920s impulsively recruit a stranger to go halves with her on a one-month rental of an Italian villa, then reluctantly adding in a snobbish aristocrat and a disapproving grand dame to stretch the money further.What follows is a familiar kind of story about rebirth through travel to beautiful places (the movie version could double-bill with A Year in Tuscany or Room With a View) but the story of the women finding new life in different ways is nonetheless winning.

 

 

 

4 Comments

Filed under Comics, Reading

Remember when I said there’d be no more time-travel movie posts? (#SFWApro)

I was wrong.

undead_1957_poster_1I’d originally listed THE UNDEAD (1957) as a possible film (all rights to image to current holder), then decided it wasn’t, then thought I should check just in case … and yes, while the main plot concerns a modern-day woman experiencing her past life under hypnotic regression, she’s able to change her past to save her previous incarnation’s life, then one of the scientists working with her has to go back to fix it (a rather unconvincing grandfather paradox argument, that if she doesn’t die on schedule, none of her later incarnations can ever exist). Directed by Roger Corman, this drags a lot in the medieval sequences, but it still has a level of competence a lot of the clunky amateurish productions I’ve written about here can’t approach. “Thou art the author of the piece—and Satan be the critic.”

Case in point, SPACEBABES MEET THE MONSTERS (2003) is an unfunny parody in which a group of brain-dead volunteers go forward in time where they’re caught in a battle between terrifying alien monsters and hot alien women who have no experience of kissing. I wouldn’t have bothered if Netflix had listed the running time accurately (under an hour so I can ignore it); Patrick Macnee appears as the narrator. “You’re the foremost genius in the world—that’s why we’re willing to risk our lives as your time-traveling guinea pigs.”

LOVE STORY 2050 (2008) was one I did have on my list and only now got to. This is a Bollywood fantasy in which the death of the protagonist’s Great Love drives him to 2050 Mumbai where he attempts to convince her reincarnation that their love was meant to be. The early love scenes in the present worked better for me than most of the future stuff. “Zeisha is tomorrow’s woman that yesterday talked about.”

THE 25TH REICH (2012) is one I’d given up on seeing (I paid twice for it on a streaming service that didn’t deliver) and would have been happy in hindsight not to. Some films are so bad you must see them, this is so bad you mustn’t, despite a good concept (Nazis steal a flying saucer from when it first crashed and use it to change the outcome of WW II). Unfortunately most of the running time is devoted to the platoon’s endless and tedious talk (neither the writing nor the acting are good enough to support that dramatic decision), whether to keep the budget down or because the creators thought they could do something seriously dramatic. “Anybody can make history, Corporal Updike, but only great men can write it.”

I never had THE INDIAN IN THE CUPBOARD (1995) on my list until I remembered recently that the magically animated plastic figure of the title is an actual time-shifted Iroquois (Litefoot) from the 1700s, not simply a toy coming to life. This starts slower than I remembered but holds up well as the protagonist delights in his new friend only to gradually realize he doesn’t have the right to play god with his “toys” (unlike the book, the Indian refuses to have Jack use the cupboard to give him a wife at the end of the story). With David Keith as a cowboy and Lindsay Crouse as the hero’s mom. “You don’t deserve that hair.”

JACK BROWN GENIUS (1994) is a Kiwi film in which a monk who died attempting glider flight gets his soul flung forward a thousand years where he tries to convince the eponymous inventor to redeem him by perfecting his research (“Otherwise, I am damned for the sin of self-slaughter.”). Not for the book—I don’t count ghosts—and so I used it as a talking lamp while working on other things (and can’t say I missed anything, it’s a very unfunny comedy)> “Careful boy—the wench speaks with the tongue of a serpent!”

 

2 Comments

Filed under Movies, Now and Then We Time Travel

Time travel, TV style (#SFWApro)

CRIME TRAVELER was a dreadfully dull British cop show in which the protagonist discovers one of his police station’s forensic scientists is secretly working on a time machine developed by her father. Although it’s not possible to alter the past, using the machine does make investigating crimes easier, with the catch that if you stay too long in the past, you’ll be trapped in time forever (another example of making up bullshit rules to add some suspense). The lead is wooden and the stories just never catch fire.

Tenchu_1TENCHU  by contrast, is a terrific Japanese miniseries in which a female ninja from the warring states era is mysteriously hurled forward to the present, where she becomes the surrogate daughter/ninja enforcer for a suburban senior who’s determined no-one should ever suffer the kind of tragedy she did when she lost her daughter. This is often rather issue-of-the-week (spousal abuse, sex slavery, scam operations targeting seniors) but it works well. Part of that is the two strong female leads, partly that the fight scenes are awesome: no stereotypical ninja stuff, just moving fast and hitting hard (all rights to image with current holder). “Lives are important—you should never take them away.”

THE DISAPPEARANCE OF NAGATO YUKI-CHAN was a sequel to The Disappearance of Haruhi Susimaya taking place in that parallel world, where Nagato is just a shy nerd rather than an ET and Kyon desperate to tell her how he feels. Online research indicated this was treated as a genuine parallel world rather than the typical anime reboot where the same characters (from Haruhi’s original series) get slightly different treatment; having seen this, I really can’t see it that way so it’s not for the book. “If he’s been here six months, he’s no longer mysterious, nor a transfer student.”

THE SECRET WORLD OF POLLY FLINT is a plodding British fantasy in which a young girl discovers the medieval inhabitants of the village where she lives are “time gypsies” able to pop in and out of other eras—and then three of them get trapped in the present. It says a lot that the first episode of this I could find was fourth out of six, and I don’t think I missed anything. “You only think it’s you that’s real and me that’s not because there’s more of you.”

The British TIME RIDERS isn’t much better: a scientist tries to prove to her boss that her time machine works by bringing a young boy to the present from the 1800s, only to have him decide to dissect the child for Sinister Experiments. Scientist then adapts her time machine to her motorcycle and takes off with the kid, riding into the English Civil War for the usual anachronistic perils (“She’s a witch!”). Forgettable. “The lake of fire is the second death!”

Leave a comment

Filed under Now and Then We Time Travel, TV

That rocking horse I mentioned? Kept rocking (#SFWApro)

Which is to say the cold that wiped me out last week wiped me out this week too. It wasn’t until Wednesday that I really had my energy back, and found myself fidgeting at watching endless TV for the time-travel book. Only I kept on watching the rest of the week because a)I still ran out of steam pretty fast; b)I had a long doctor’s appointment yesterday (nothing wrong, just a check-up, but it was a busy morning there) which really mangled the day. Oh, and c, I still have a lot of stuff to watch for the book, so I can’t slack up.

So not much accomplished, but I still put in a full work week, less time off for the doctor, so yay me! And I did get my new And column in today (on the current panic over Syrian sleeper agents) though it’s not up yet.

I’m also thinking about how to structure my days as I keep working on Time Travel on Screen over the next few months. Hours of watching TV make me very restless (I can sit for much longer watching movies), so I need to break up my time to make sure I don’t overload. However I also need sizable blocks to work on other projects, because that seems to work best for me. And at some point, I’m going to have to go all-Time Travel, all the time, so there won’t be anything to alternate with.

Food for thought.

And here’s a photo of Trixie on what she’s decided is her new throne.

IMG_0580

Leave a comment

Filed under Now and Then We Time Travel, Personal, The Dog Ate My Homework, Time management and goals, TV, Writing

Politics and news

Erik Loomis vents about the increasing emphasis on college as a tool for training workers rather than learning. I think he’s spot on. He references Australia, where the government is pushing universities to focus scientific research on what corporations can make money off. And I remember NC governor Pat McCrory complaining universities should get rid of liberal arts degrees and Florida proposing (I don’t think it came off) to charge students more tuition if the job market can’t use their skills.

•If you put health/medical/genetic information into an app or an online database, medical privacy laws do not apply.

•The AMA calls for a ban on those TV prescription-drug ads.

•A bill banning “no negative review” clauses in contracts is moving through the Senate.

•The FTC announces new telemarketing restrictions, covering the use of prepaid cards or wire transfers over the phone.

•The mystically oriented Isis Bookstore in Colorado has been accused of supporting—well, you know.

•Consumerist looks at things that jack up your auto insurance rates: bad credit, living in a black neighborhood, widowhood.

•Washington’s Governor Inslee compares banning Syrian refugees to interning Japanese -Americans in WW II. Though the writer of the article, Amber Phillips, has to work in a tut-tut at Obama for making mock of his opponents over this issue. Sorry, but nothing will make people who think five-year-olds are threatening listen to “nuance.” And I agree with Roy Edroso, Obama’s take is a common-sense one too. Oh, and the mayor of Roanoke, Va. has held up the internment camps as sound policy. And Donald Trump is proposing special IDs for Muslims (little yellow stars on their clothes, maybe?)

•The FDA has approved genetically modified salmon for sale in the US without GM labeling.

Leave a comment

Filed under economics, Politics

A moment of zen (#SFWApro)

“Those who understand the tao delight, like cats, in just sitting and watching without any goal or result in mind. But when a cat gets tired of sitting, it gets up and goes for a walk or hunts mice. It does not punish itself or compete with other cats in an endurance test as to how long it can remain immovable—unless there is some real reason for being still, such as catching a bird.”—Alan Watts

I like this quote. It captures what I was talking about here, the state of mind where I’m only sitting and working because I’m supposed to be sitting and working, not because I’m actually accomplishing anything. Where in Screwtape’s words I’m doing neither what I want nor what I should. Better by far when I’m in that mood to stop pseudo-working and just relax.

Leave a comment

Filed under Personal, Time management and goals, Writing

Doc Savage, Philip Jose´Farmer style (#SFWApro)

987974For a break from Lester Dent I read DOC SAVAGE: His Apocalyptic Life as the Archangel of Technopolis and Exotica, as the Golden-Eyed Hero of 181 Super-Sagas, as the Bronze Knight of the Running Board, Including his Final Battle Against the Forces of Hell Itself for the first time in around 40 years.

This was Philip José Farmer’s biography of Doc, including working him into Farmer’s Wold Newton mythos (more below), and like a lot of reference books it worked better when I wasn’t as familiar with the subject. Even given that, the book is full of interesting details: a map of Doc’s HQ based on the stories, what we know about the Crime College and the Hidalgo Company warehouse, biographical information on Doc and his aides. There’s also a one-chapter bio of Lester Dent that I liked. On the downside, some of this is also Farmer just being self-indulgent, like a chapter explaining how Lester Dent, William Burroughs and Henry Miller are all reflections of the same “apocalyptic” mindset.

And then there’s Wold Newton.

A couple of years before this book, Farmer wrote Tarzan Alive, a biography of Tarzan that claimed (as Burroughs does in the first page of Tarzan of the Apes) that Lord Greystoke was a real person, though fictionalized by Burroughs. Farmer tops this by claiming that Tarzan’s amazing physical prowess was because a radioactive meteor striking a village called Wold Newton in England centuries earlier had triggered a mutation in several travelers passing through. Tarzan was their descendant, ditto Sherlock Holmes, Doc Savage, the Shadow and various other heroes explored in the family tree. Doc Savage: His Apocalyptic Life extends this, filling in Doc’s “real” background (his father was the kidnapper in the Holmes story “The Adventure of the Priory School,” atoning for his sins by creating a champion of justice in Doc) and adding new branches (Fu Manchu) to the family tree (Monk, it turns out, is a distant relative).

This comes off now as a forerunner for League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, though the genealogical aspect makes it a little more cumbersome. It doesn’t hook me the way it did back when I first read these books, and actually wrote some articles for a Wold Newton fanzine (it folded before publication alas), probably because I don’t immerse myself in my fiction the way I did when I was lonelier. Still I couldn’t help thinking of new additions to the canon (“If Arsene Lupin is in the genealogy, obviously Lupin III is a descendant …”).

Farmer also wrote a Doc Savage pastiche The Mad Goblin which I remember as being fun; I’ll get to it eventually. I suppose at some point I’ll read his later book Escape From Loki, though I’m not looking forward to it. A lot of Farmer’s later work was way below his peak—the Wold Newton Sherlock Holmes/Tarzan crossover The Adventure of the Peerless Peer was a horrible mess. Then again, as noted at the link, it’s a seminal work for a lot of later writers … so maybe.

(All rights to cover reside with current holder. Art is uncredited but it’s Roger Kastel’s image of Doc superimposed on pulp artist William Baumhofer’s work, as noted in the first comment [I originally put James Bama rather than Kastel])

14 Comments

Filed under Doc Savage, Reading

More Paris

Some right-wingers are particularly offended that France isn’t responding in the right way. Mollie Hemingway, for example, thinks “Imagine” is “godless and Communistic” so people shouldn’t be drawing so much comfort from it.

•Chris Christie thinks even five-year-old refugees should be kept out of the USA. Texas state Rep. Tony Dale thinks letting in Syrians is bad because they’ll be able to buy guns (he is, however, a gun-rights advocates who opposes any sort of restrictions). Writing in Mother Jones, Kevin Drum argues that liberals should support restricting Syrian immigration to score political points; at the link LGM disagrees. And LGM makes the same point again here, quoting an article that points out the people we’re talking about punishing are innocent victims of the people we’re fighting.

•The Intercept points out ISIS would love it if Muslims were driven out of the West.

•Eric Erickson explains that he’s too scared to go the opening of the new Star Wars film because the jihadis could attack and kill everyone! And it’s totally different from when that guy in Aurora shot up the movie house because he wasn’t a terrorist!

•Trump wants to shut down mosques because we have no choice but to be bigots.

•Cable news talking heads freak out that Obama isn’t talking tough and vowing to bomb the Middle East back to the stone age.

 

1 Comment

Filed under Politics