Monthly Archives: October 2024

Cherchez la femme — blame the women!

Conspiracy theories, if they keep spiraling out of control, eventually go for The Jews (when Marjorie Taylor Greene says “they” caused Hurricanes Helene and Milton, I assume that’s who she meant). As I wrote last month, something similar happens when men get pissed and frustrated about the world — whatever’s wrong, it’s women’s fault. Not submissive. Not wanting to get married. Not willing to put up with a subpar husband because hey, becoming an old maid isn’t an option and he’s the best you can get.

This led me to revisit Laurie Penny’s excellent “On Nerd Entitlement” essay for an example. Penny’s writing in response to a guy who lamented on line that he’s a nerd with no social skills and a miserable sex life. The guy commented that if he’d been born in his grandparent’s shtetl, things would be different: a matchmaker would have found him a wife, he’d have a half-dozen children by now, a man of status and position — plus he’d be getting it regular (he didn’t say that specifically but I assume that’s part of it).

Penny, who shows far more sympathy for the guy than I feel, points out that yes, this would be a great deal for him, not so much for his wife, who’d have no options in life but to care for him and the kids, assuming she’d survived all those pregnancies (there’s also a lot about how nerds can’t see that nerd girls were in the same boat in many ways).

For another example, LGM looks at one devout Trump constituency: divorced, bitter men (“Politicians like Trump are saying men are getting the raw end of the deal here after the Me Too movement, and giving voice to some of the pain and challenges men are facing,”). Much like the “yoosta bee” liberals who become fervent right-wingers, the men end up embracing all Trump positions.

(It’s almost ironic given Trump is such a pathetic specimen of manhood. By the traditional standards — pay your bills, keep your word, be faithful to your wife — he’s a failure as a man. When caught in a lie, he lies he never said it. He snivels and whines about getting bad press or Harris getting good press, to the point of threatening to take the networks broadcast licenses and sell them if they don’t treat poor little crybaby Donny nicer. Apparently for some men (and women) the fact that he’s loud, bullying, swaggering and refuses to accept responsibility for anything makes him a total badass guy (a misconception I wrote about here). The same may be true of his campaign’s loudmouth spokesperson Steve Cheung.)

In another look at male frustration, Celeste Davis suggests the reason men are giving up on college is that college has “too many” women: once it became more than 50 percent female students it reads as A Girl Thing and lots of guys wouldn’t be caught dead doing A Girl Thing. She makes a good case, though a female friend of mine offered an alternative: women have better emotional control (contrary to stereotype) which makes it easier to buckle down and apply themselves.

Davis cites as evidence (not her only evidence) a guy online who argues that school is essentially feminine and therefore intolerable for boys: it requires you sit down, shut up and listen to your teacher, accepting they know more than you — and that’s how girls do it. The guy’s way is to say “I’m right, you’re wrong, I’m doing it my way!” This is an old undead sexist cliche, and doesn’t make any better sense today (the military is predominantly male and they do not let you do it your way). But it occurred to me it could just as easily be evidence for my friend’s theory: the guy sounds like someone with a complete inability to listen to someone giving him instructions or orders, as if accepting he might not be right would make his dick drop off.

In another post, Davis discusses the challenge of fighting toxic masculinity without demonizing maleness. It’s good. And that the people who talk about not being ashamed of manhood are often the ones who shame any man why doesn’t conform to a specific type of standard. Tough, strong, supporting your stay-at-home wife: nothing to be ashamed of! Staying home with the kids because you’re more nurturing or your job allows you to work from home (or whatever): you’re not doing manhood right! As I’ve said before (though I don’t have the link), nobody hates men as much as antifeminists and patriarchy supporters. The ones who say men are natural rapists, so it’s all up to women to prevent them raping — we’re too subhuman to do it ourselves.

Bite me, misogynists.

For more on this sort of bullshit, check out Undead Sexist Cliches, available for ebook or in paperback.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics, Undead sexist cliches

Have we been complicit since Darwin? Books read

In COMPLICIT: How Our Cultures Enables Misbehaving Men, Reah Bravo (one of Charlie Rose’s harassment victims) acknowledges she’s stepping into a minefield by discussing how women enable harassers — however she’s very clear she doesn’t mean “she asked for it” but that women have internalized lots of myths. That they should give a guy emotional support and not confront him. That being a jackhole is “part of his creative process.” That being able to succeed in a challenging field requires being tough so just grit your teeth and endure the harassment.

While Bravo’s persuasive and the many first-person accounts she offers are compelling, she also invokes bullshit science such as paleofantasies of how all these behaviors were hardwired into us in the stone age. And I’ve read accounts from women who say they sucked it up because they needed the job or they were terrified of retaliation and Bravo doesn’t get into that very much. Interesting and worth reading, even though uneven.

My friend Ross rereading Stephen Jay Gould’s EVER SINCE DARWIN: Essays in Natural History a while back convinced me to dig out my own copy. Gould, a paleontologist, wrote a natural history column for years and this was the first collection of his essays. In it he discusses why Darwin was on the HMS Beagle (to provide educated company to the captain), the errors of sociobiology (an early example of the paleofantasy), the flaws in Immanuel Velikovsky’s science, why natural selection is not “survival of the fittest” and the impact of Cesare Lombroso’s 19th century theory criminals are evolutionary throwbacks (something I’d been meaning to reread for its obvious relevance to Jekyll and Hyde).

Gould’s an excellent writer but what draws me back to him is that he’s so good at showing science is the product of fallible human beings, not some inexorable natural force, and that it’s messier than we realize. The geologist Charles Lyell is praised for rejecting catastrophism — geological change comes in spectacular, epic upheavals — in favor of slow gradual change; in reality his view was more complicated, and wrong, than history paints it.

Gould also refuses to mock crackpot theories of the past such as preformationism, which believed every egg in a woman’s womb contains the seed of her predestined children, her children’s predestined children, her children’s children’s … Yes, it’s wrong, yes it’s absurd but Gould is more interested in how the idea developed and why its supporters thought it made sense. I’ll be rereading more Gould down the road.

#SFWApro. Cover by Jack Sparling, all rights to images remain with current holders.

2 Comments

Filed under Reading

Silent films, a biographer and a dystopia: movies

About a month back I bought THE PARAMOUNT STORY, which goes year by year through that studio’s movies like The RKO Story which I bought several years back. As Paramount’s silents are public domain, I checked out a few that looked interesting on YouTube

MISS LULU BETT (1920) stars Lois Wilson in the eponymous role of a spinster working for her in-laws as a kitchen drudge, marrying in haste and repenting at leisure before finally finding the strength to stand up for herself. Soapish but engaging, and Wilson is sparkling. Directed by Cecil B. Demille’s brother William C. “You’re the first person who ever noticed I wasn’t there.”

Watching FORBIDDEN PARADISE (1924) was an odd experience as the best copy of this early Ernst Lubitsch picture I could find seems to be missing about 25 minutes. Then again, I may be misinterpreting things because all the title cards were written in a foreign language so I’ve only a minimal idea of what was happening.

I know from THE PARAMOUNT STORY this involves royal Pola Negri bestowing her favor handsome soldier Rod La Roque, only to have him join the revolution when he learns he’s far from the only one she favors — can Negri’s canny chancellor Adolph Menjou save the day? Negri’s someone I’ve heard of but never seen before; she definitely has screen presence but obviously that didn’t help when watching this. For all they talk about how silents didn’t need dialog, they definitely need title cards!

I’m much more familiar with Gloria Swanson’s legend than Negri, though I’ve not seen her in anything I can recall except Sunset Boulevard. STAR STRUCK (1925) stars the sexy glamor queen in an atypical comic and down-to-Earth role, a waitress crushing on the restaurant’s actress-crazy cook; would taking an acting class by the mail enable her to win his heart? Swanson’s charming and this has a certain appeal but not quite enough — and by today’s standards, the guy she wants comes off a bit of a jerk. “Standing before the mirror, register the expression of ‘Contented Wife.’”

THE CITY OF YOUR FINAL DESTINATION (2010) is a Merchant Ivory film in which an Iranian-English professor travels to Venezuela in hopes of convincing the executors of a Great Dead Author (gay Brother Antony Hopkins, widow Laura Linney, mistress Charlotte Gainsborough) to greenlight his proposed biography of the man. The individual scenes are well done, the cast is great, but the whole is less than the sum of its parts — this is too low key to work for me. “I’ve already made my decision — and it’s not hasty.”

UGLIES (2024) adapts the Scott Westerfeld Y/A about a young girl living in a gloriously utopian future where at sixteen everyone gets turned from an ordinary schmuck into a Pretty, freeing you to look fabulous and have fun forever and ever. Only gee, isn’t it odd how her BFF, having taken the treatment first, is now so different and uncaring towards her? Reminiscent of both Twilight Zone: Number 12 Looks Just Like You (Westerfeld says it wasn’t an influence though he sees the similarity) and Logan’s Run (another dystopia full of shallow, beautiful people) this doesn’t live up to my memory of the book. Part of the problem is that the protagonist is so vibrant, I don’t get the feel Ugly life is as miserable as it’s supposed to be. I’m also amused that going back to nature and forming a commune remains the solution to high-tech dystopia (it’s an idea with a looooong history). “Free will is a cancer.”

#SFWApro. All rights to images remain with current holders.

Leave a comment

Filed under Movies

A week that kind of evaporated

Which is to say, not productive.

Part of that was that I’ve been sleeping poorly. If calls from TYG’s job don’t wake me, Plushie’s newfound enthusiasm for crossing over my legs after I go to sleep will do it. I’ve tried adjusting so that he can get to his spot more easily but apparently it then shifts to somewhere else inconvenient.

(We found this guy on our door when we came back from morning walkies. He’s no longer on our door though I did my best not to hurt him when I removed him).

Left to myself I typically wake up after two or three hours, move to the spare bedroom and fall asleep next to Wisp (I’ve no idea why this works). Waking up so much sooner throws things off and I wind up waking up at 1:30 AM or 2 AM and not getting back to sleep. Of course as I work for myself I can take naps during the day, but I never quite catch up.

Another part of the evaporation was that work for The Local Reporter once again expanded to suck up time. I sent out emails Monday for three different stories, not knowing which of them I could get answers for. I got two out of three. One proved unexpectedly complicated; the other required interviews on Tuesday and Wednesday. This threw me off — the Wednesday phone interview wasn’t until 10 AM so I couldn’t wrap up until that afternoon. However my story on local firefighters deploying west to help with the Hurricane Helene aftermath was a good one.

(Party crashers when TYG and I went out for breakfast recently).

I got a little bit of work done on Southern Discomfort in the time remaining, but not much. Most of my time went to Jekyll and Hyde because that takes less creative thought. So I got work done, but not directed where I wanted it. And I didn’t do anything at Atomic Junk Shop because of some site problems. I think we have a workaround for enough of the problems to post next week.

On the plus side, the weather has finally turned cool, occasionally to chilly. I like it, TYG likes it. The dogs are full of pep on morning walks, though Plushie with his dim eyesight resists walking in the early dark. And the weekend is here.

#SFWApro.

Leave a comment

Filed under Nonfiction, Personal, Southern Discomfort, The Dog Ate My Homework, Time management and goals, Writing

It’s wine, not chili!

Which is to say I don’t see the point of invoking fire as an image in these wine labels.

#SFWApro. All rights to images remain with current holders.

Leave a comment

Filed under Miscellanea

Some cheerful links

It looks like Alex Jones’ Infowars will be liquidated in bankruptcy to pay off Jones’ legal debts to the Sandy Hook parents. One report was that Media Matters, Jones’ longtime antagonist, is interested. I doubt it’ll shut Jones up — he’ll be back in some form — but every blow against that shitbag pleases me.

Why moms are leaving gift cards in diaper boxes.

The DOJ has indicted 42 members of a California white supremacist gang.

Kevin Levin wonders what to put on empty pedestals of torn-down Confederate statues.

Biden’s student-loan debt forgiveness plan is back on.

Empty Wheel salutes Kamala Harris for turning a question about her polling into a discussion of facts.

Kristin du Mez on why democracy is the Christian way (“The gospel of Jesus Christ advances through divine grace and human persuasion, not by government power and coercion.”)

At least one antisemite suffered some consequences.

Mexico’s female soccer players are shaking up the gender status quo.

Oklahoma State Superintendent of Education Ryan Walters wants a Bible in every class and classes incorporating it into lessons. Local school districts are just saying no. Interesting trivia, the only Bibles that fit Walters’ specifications are Trump Bibles.

Jurassic Ferret Park — scientists have cloned the almost extinct black-footed ferret. Scientists are helping other species survive by moving them to new locations. And by IVF.

How farmers are making money by selling solar power. And gene therapy may reduce cows’ impact on global warming.

“I think right now we have 11 cases. We started out with 3.6 million cases.” — Jimmy Carter on his incredibly successful campaign to eradicate Guinea worm.

Colorado “stop the steal” government ex-official Tina Peterson got nine years for giving Nazi dog-whistler Mike Lindell access to tamper with election equipment.

Contrary to Republican lies, the economy is doing well.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

Good girl? Bad girl? Fallen girl? Ivy in Jekyll and Hyde

The Victorian stage adaptations of Jekyll and Hyde livened it up by making middle-aged Jekyll a younger, more attractive man, and giving him a fiancee. This carried over into the movies though I’m confident they’d have given him some sort of love interest — it’s what movies do.

The silent films took the next step of giving Hyde a love, or at least a lust interest. In the 1920 Jekyll and Hyde, it’s Barrymore’s lust for the dancer Gina (Nita Naldi) that drives him to become Hyde. That way he can sin without compromising his stainless soul, right? Right?

Wrong. But you knew that.

Gina doesn’t play a large role. Ivy, in the 1932 Fredric March version and the 1941 Spencer Tracy remake, is much more prominent a character, played respectively by Miriam Hopkins and Ingrid Bergman. In both films when Jekyll’s true love is out of his reach, it’s lust for Ivy that inspires him to turn into Hyde.

Ivy is coded as a Bad Girl, the Whore to the fiancee’s Madonna. I’ve seen several descriptions of the film that assume she is a literal sex worker. Despite the fact she ends up Jekyll’s mistress, supported by him, I think that’s debatable.

When Hopkins’ Ivy meets March’s Jekyll, her interest is sex, not cash; March was a handsome leading man and she likes what she sees. When she meets Hyde later, he lets her know he can buy her nice things provided she’s nice to him but he’s a creepy bully and she’s not into it (plus he looks like a literal man-ape). When Hyde makes it clear she doesn’t have a choice (as I posted recently, he’s abusive from the start), she agrees, sealing her doom (as I’ve said before, death is the price for being a bad girl on screen).

The same dynamic happens in the Tracy film, though Bergman’s Ivy comes off more fun-loving and innocent than Hopkins’ Ivy. The production code was a lot tougher on sex in films by 1941 and MGM considered itself a class act; even Ivy’s workplace is cleaner and lighter than in the 1932. Perhaps MGM’s desire to keep Ivy quasi-respectable is why she doesn’t give in to Hyde’s coercion: he pays the manager to fire her, thereby leaving her desperate for a source of support.

It’s true that Ivy in both films becomes Hyde’s mistress. That doesn’t mean she’s selling her body on a regular basis. As City of Eros says, the 19th century lines on prostitution were blurry. For some women it was a day job, for others it was something they turned to occasionally, as a way to pay the rent. Ivy could have been either (though I don’t see her as a full-timer) or it could have been Hyde becoming her lover was the first time she’d traded on sex. Being a kept woman would, for a lot of people, have been a different thing.

Don’t get me wrong, if Ivy was a full-time sex worker she still wouldn’t deserve the abuse and ultimately the murder she suffers. The goal isn’t to judge, it’s simply to analyze.

#SFWApro. All rights to images remain with current holders.

2 Comments

Filed under Movies, Writing

People died, and now Trump (and others) lied

As LGM says, when Hurricane Sandy hit back in 2012, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie didn’t hesitate to work with the Obama administration. In 2024, Republicans are actively throwing sand in the gears of relief work and spreading misinformation for political gain. Claiming, for example, that victims of Helene only get $750 in FEMA funding because all the money’s going to the Ukraine or illegal immigrants or whatever. The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 will shrink FEMA, cutting its budget and making it harder to receive aid. The money will then flow to more of Trump’s budget-busting tax cuts.

Where Trump leads, other slime follow. Jesse Watters parrots the claim about FEMA money going to immigrants. Marjorie Taylor Greene implies the hurricane was no accident because “they” can control the weather. When she was told this is bullshit, she kept screaming it wasn’t. RNC head Lara Trump says her father-in-law is right.

House Speaker Mike Johnson refuses to call Congress back into session to provide extra disaster funding. Mark Robinson ducked two votes on calling for federal help. With Milton about to hammer central Florida, Ron DeSantis still won’t take Kamala Harris’ calls on federal help because that would be “politicizing” the storm.

Christian conservative Megan Basham parrots Trump’s lies while asserting that yes, we have some obligation to other people, but Americans first. First, there’s no conflict as Biden isn’t diverting FEMA money to help immigrants. Second, as Fred Clark points out, Basham’s argument falls into a long tradition of twisting Jesus: he says we help our neighbors, the response is, in Clark’s words, “Can’t you please just tell us that there’s somebody we’re allowed not to love?”

All that said, my prayers to everyone facing Hurricane Milton landfall. I’ve been in hurricanes, evacuated from hurricanes and this is going to be ugly.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

Covers from out of the past

This uncredited cover baffles me.

As it doesn’t appear to connect to bowling, I’m guessing it’s some sort of labor/industrial sabotage racket — you want to hurt your rival, the bad guy will trigger a strike. But that’s only a guess. And how does that tie in with the chorus line? I’ve looked online without any luck finding answers.

Seeing this Kelly Freas cover gave me one of those “times change” moments. I was never a Mad fan — their sense of humor doesn’t mesh with mine — but those paperback reprints from the magazine were omnipresent when I was a kid. On every newsstand, every spinner rack, or so it seemed — 93 books over four decades. I never thought about the fact they’d disappeared by the end of the last century but the sight of this image hit me with the awareness. Mutter, mutter, something about kids these days.

#SFWApro. All rights to images remain with current holders.

Leave a comment

Filed under cover art, Reading

If Trump’s fascist and you know it, clap your hands

Yes, Roy Edroso says, if you use as much Nazi rhetoric as The Weird Felon and Vance, it’s accurate to call them Nazis. Yes it is. And anti-Semitic. Ditto acolytes spreading anti-Semitic tropes and talking points. Or threatening one really violent day to unleash police (LGM has thoughts on this)— somehow I don’t think he imagines them busting J6 heads or white-collar criminals like himself. The Felon is also threatening Google because their search engine shows too many bad stories about him and they’re all made up anyway.

Meanwhile, JD Vance complains reporting on his racist lies is unfair because he wants them to focus on how bad it is to have Haitians living in America.

Plus there’s their general hostility to education and educators.

And open, dedicated Nazis are doing their best to spread Hitler’s propaganda online while Republican Senate candidate Royce White claims the wrong side won in WW II.

It’s much better odds for democracy and America than before Harris took over from Biden (much as I think he’s been a great president). However we also get people who don’t take the stakes seriously, like one woman who said sure, Trump might become a dictator, but “politics is all about tradeoffs.” Others simply have to screen out information that would make them uncomfortable with voting Republican.

The Very Old Felon is losing on most points — abortion, particularly — so he’s going big on immigration (see here too) and race. And of course, telling stupid lies. And ranting about Kamala Harris having worked for McDonald’s. Fox News is happy to help. So are Trump’s court prophets. It fits with his administration trying to make up leftwing terrorists to fight.

It’s not just fascism we have to worry about. Florida Republicans are still trying to make Covid great again.

And, of course, there’s Republicans willingness to overthrow democracy to preserve white male Christian supremacy. Including RFK Jr. making ridiculous ballot arguments in hopes of helping The Felon (more here). Happily courts have kicked the schemes mentioned to the curb. Some election officials are trying extreme transparency to show they have no tricks to hide. And Dems are getting ready for Republicans to fight in the courts if Harris wins. If Trump wins, I agree with Marcy Wheeler democracy is on the chopping block.Kristin Du Mez explains why democracy is the Christian way.

Whatever you’re doing to help defeat the felon, keep doing it. And if you’re not doing anything, please start, if you can.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics