Category Archives: Reading

I don’t hate the game but I don’t play it.

I picked up THE SAVAGE DYARIES: The Collected Doc Savage Essays of Dafydd Neal Dyar, Volume One, to read his article on the Doc Savage novel Land of Long Juju. I knew from a reference elsewhere that Dyar had discovered that it was originally set in Latin America, which explains things like African tribes who speak Mayan and shrink heads — Donovan changed the setting but not the details (so I’m sure the dreadful racism would have been equally dreadful in the original).

The essay didn’t provide any information why it got switched but I was still glad to read it. There are also other interesting stuff — a detailed discussion on the disappeared airship that inspired part of The Lost Oasis, speculation whether the Mayans giving Doc jade wouldn’t make more sense than gold and an article about what Pat Savage really thought about her cousin (it includes the interesting reveal that Dent would have had her running a detective firm before his editor pushed for a beauty salon). This stuff is definitely useful for writing Savage Adventures.

There are also a number of essays built around the premise that Doc is a real person whose exploits were fictionalized in Doc Savage. Two interviews with Doc in the style of Philip José Farmer. Doc revealing he deliberately influenced Warner Brothers to make the 1975 movie campy. Discussing the hypothetical backstory of Doc’s mother.

I have no objection to this approach (which Rick Lai’s chronology also uses) though it’s not the path I’m taking. In Savage Adventures I assume Doc is “real” in the world of the series but not our own; reading Dyar makes me realize the two approaches sometimes lead to different places.

Lai’s chronology, for instance, involves a lot of figuring out which real countries Doc was adventuring in during Dust of Death, Golden Peril and other stories. I can simply assume fictional countries such as Hidalgo and Santa Amoza exist in Doc’s secondary reality and not worry about it. Farmer has to explain how Doc can have offices on the 86th floor of the Empire State Building when it’s an observation deck; I can note the discrepancy and move on.

Or consider World’s Fair Goblin. Set at the New York World’s Fair, it came out the same month the fair opened. Obviously if it happened then, Lester Dent wouldn’t have had time to write it up, nor his editors to go over it, then get it on the stands. Farmer declares it’s a fiction Dent wrote to cash in on a big event; Lai suggests it took place before the official opening. I can assume it happened just as Dent wrote it.

That doesn’t mean their approach is wrong. It’s the same one Sherlockians have been using to write about Holmes for years, and it’s equally legitimate for other fictional characters. Reading Dyar just made me aware how the two paths end up in different places.

Covers by James Bama. All rights to images remain with current holders.

Leave a comment

Filed under Doc Savage, Reading

March winds and April showers brings forth May covers

Don’t know the artist but I do like the cover.

A chaotic laboratory scene by William Timmins

I’m not sure what’s happening on this Robert Stanley cover but I like it.

And a Sex Sells cover by Charles Binger to wrap up.

All rights to images remain with current holders.

Leave a comment

Filed under cover art, Reading

Women who know, women who fight, women being watched: books

Nnedi Okorafor’s SHE WHO KNOWS is a short prequel to Who Fears Death? telling the backstory of one of the supporting characters. The protagonist is a woman from a salt-dealing culture, nudged by inexplicable impulses to push against her gender role; the results make her family and their community rich but inevitably brings trouble as well. Coming-of-age stories don’t work for me but Okorafor pulled this one off. I found the ending too abrupt, though; possibly it would have worked better if I’d read Who Fears Death more recently than 2011 (it’s also setting up for a V2).

My friend Ross bought me BOMBSHELLS: The Death of Illusion by Marguerite Bennett and multiple artist as a birthday present, so I’m finally back in Bennett’s alt.WW II where the superheroes are all women. In this collection everyone from Zatanna and Raven to Poison Ivy, Lois Lane and Supergirl is slowly drawn to the brutal siege of Leningrad, but can they help its people? And what about Hugo Strange and his mad plan to breed a super-race to take over from humanity? As always, a fun series with interesting takes on DC characters.

WE ARE WATCHING by Alison Gaylin has a recently widowed bookstore-owner increasingly unnerved by the way people seem to be watching her and her daughter, and chatting about them online. Still, her paranoid pothead father, an aging rocker, has to be imagining it when he claims they’re all the targets of a vast conspiracy that tried to kill him just like they did JFK — right?

He is not, of course, imagining it.

This is a thriller for the age of Qanon and Pizzagate (there’s a reference to characters searching for a secret room in the bookstore where the human sacrifices are carried out), a conspiracy born online and formed by connecting up dots that don’t exist, which is enough to drive people to kill or die for it. I don’t quite buy it could stay this tight and obsessive for two decades but it’s still an excellent book.

Covers by Ant Lucia and Marguerite Sauvage (bottom). All rights to images remain with current holders.

Leave a comment

Filed under Comics, Reading

Covers for April’s last Tuesday

First, one by Otto Storch.

A low-key one by A. Leslie Ross, but I like it.

This one I’m posting mostly because it’s a relic of another time, when the “great white hunter” surrounded by his faithful African servants was a common thing to read about. Art is uncredited.

All rights remain with current holders.

Leave a comment

Filed under cover art, Reading

From the kitchen to the Appalachians: books

CONSIDER THE FORK: A History of How We Cook and Eat by Bee Wilson looks at how cooking and eating technology both reflects and shapes our diet and our culture. The labor intensive recipes of medieval times, which showcased that you had the army of servants required. The different roles of knives, forks, fingers, spoons and sporks. Why medieval spit-roasting is completely different from oven roasting. Why America relies on volume measures in recipes rather than weight (Wilson concludes it’s largely because cups were easier to manage on the frontier than a scale and weight). And the endless parade of naysayers declaring whatever the New Tech is, it will mean the death of cooking. A couple of Wilson’s theories feel speculative, but this is overall excellent.

AFTER DARK (cover by Michael Flanagan) was Manly Wade Wellman’s second Silver John novel, pitting John against the pre-Columbian, pre-human Shonokin, a race who battled Wellman’s earlier hero, John Thunstone. Here they’re scheming to obtain one Appalachian landowner’s property (as in the previous novel, references to Asheville and University of North Carolina read differently now that they’re not just names on a map) because it’s lying across a ley line and they’ll gain great power if the man’s out of the way and they can run a track right through his land. For much of the book, they’re not that different from a human conspiracy — they could be a cult or even Red spies — but the climax is full-on occult wildness.

The weakness of the Thunstone stories was that Thunstone always won too easily — a thrust of his sword-cane with its saint-blessed blade or a puff of pipe tobacco laced with shamanic herbs and the Shonokin (or his other adversaries) fold. By the 1950s when he began writing John’s tales, Wellman had become a much better writer; John works harder to win than Thunstone ever did, though he wields a surprising amount of magic at the climax (after all his experiences, though, perhaps it’s not surprising he’s learned some stuff).

I’ll register one complaint with the book, that Evadare has been virtually Chuck Cunninghamed — as in The Old Gods Waken she’s not with him but there’s no reason given, other than (I presume) Wellman didn’t want to have her tagging along with John. Setting this prior to their love affair would have suited me better.

All rights to cover image remain with current holder.

Leave a comment

Filed under Reading

Let the jokes about the title begin!

From what I’ve been able to glean online, it’s some kind of Gothic romance but the title …

Cover art is uncredited. All rights belong to current holder.

Leave a comment

Filed under cover art, Reading

Modesty Blaise and the Avengers: comic strip heroes in trade paperback

After watching MY NAME IS MODESTY a few weeks back, I decided to dive back in to the world of Peter O’Donnell’s daring heroine, starting with the one volume of the comic strip Durham Library has that I haven’t read, Ripper Jax (by O’Donnell and artist Enric Badia Romero.

The best strip in this 1990s collection is the first one, in which Modesty learns a psychometric friend of hers is being coerced by knife-wielding gangster “Ripper” Jax, who’s holding the psychic’s daughter hostage. Can Modestry and her trusty dioscuri Willie Garvin rescue the girl and fix Jax’s wagon? Yes, of course, but there are some surprises along the way. The remaining strips are good, though not as good:

  • The Maori Connection. Trouble in New Zealand where Modesty’s friend Sir Gerald’s niece is in peril from someone looking to eliminate competition for a large inheritance.
  • Honeygun. That’s the nickname of a female assassin who did Modesty a favor years ago; now the bill’s coming due.
  • Durango. Two of Modesty and Willie’s friends are hostages with the eponymous revolutionary leader in Guatemala. The rescue plan goes sideways when it turns out Durango knows and hates Modesty Blaise.

The introduction to the collection argues that while Modesty is frequently described as the female James Bond, they’re fundamentally different: Bond works on orders from M, Modesty acts according to her own sense of morality. Sounds about right.

I recently finished rereading AVENGERS: Behold the Vision by Roy Thomas and multiple artists (most notably John Buscema, who did the cover, and Barry Windsor-Smith) as part of my Silver Age Reread over at Atomic Junk Shop. While my assessment of this run hasn’t changed from the last time I read the TPB, it does strike me the team is surprisingly underpowered for “Earth’s Mightiest Heroes.” With Thor, Iron Man and Captain America out of the book and Wanda and Pietro absent it feels close to the Detroit Justice League second-string level at times. Perhaps that’s why Thomas has Hawkeye ditch his bow and arrow in favor of becoming Goliath but that role never really worked for me. Still, I’m an Avengers fan from the Kookie Quartet days (the era when the team was Cap, Hawkeye, Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver) so I enjoyed this (as always with decades old comics, YMMV).

All image rights remain with their current holders.

Leave a comment

Filed under Comics, Reading

This week I was trapped, tangled and in total trouble!

No, wait, that’s the guy on Sal Trapani’s cover. My week wasn’t quite that bad.

When I talked about successfully fighting off a cold last week, I was optimistic. I have kept the usual bronchial infection at arm’s length but stuff like this usually requires a day of rest to shake off and I hadn’t given myself one. Nor have I gotten one since. So I’m still feeling wiped out (a couple of bad nights of sleep didn’t help) and still coughing a little. If it persists into next week I’ll visit the doctor.

Still I did get plenty done. Work on Savage Adventures, some movies watched for Jekyll and Hyde, and two articles for The Local Reporter. One on Carrboro’s plans to protect residents in the current political climate, one on the budget for the coming fiscal year. Over at Atomic Junk Shop I blogged about Green Lantern #76, considered one of the books that launched the Bronze Age.

I’m not a fan of Denny O’Neil’s writing here — I rarely am — but that is one hell of a cool Neil Adams cover!

I also finished the taxes which proved more work than I’d anticipated. On the plus side I found enough savings that we’re entitled to refunds at the state and federal level. I mailed them off Tuesday. I’d like to say “next year I’ll handle them much more efficiently” but like so many Americans I’ve said that too many years to believe it.

This weekend I do hope to turn Sunday into a lazy, layabout day. We’ll see if it happens. In any case, have a great weekend everyone!

All rights to images remain with current holders.

Leave a comment

Filed under Doc Savage, Nonfiction, Personal, Time management and goals, Writing

One of my favorite covers

Gervasio Gallardo’s The Last Unicorn.

Happy Friday

Leave a comment

Filed under cover art, Reading

The birth of the Hulk, and the distorted origins of Marvel Comics

Rereading The Origins of Marvel Comics has reminded me that nobody did more to destroy Stan Lee’s legacy than Stan Lee.

I’m reading it because on chapter of my Jekyll and Hyde book will be devoted to the Hulk. Many comics characters have a Jekyll and Hyde influence — Two-Face, Eclipso, Mr. Hyde (yes, obviously) but the Hulk stands out by his spectacular success. Two Hulk movies, several cartoons (more than I’d realized before starting this work) and the Bill Bixby/Lou Ferrigno TV show. I’ll be watching all of them but first I wanted to read Lee’s own account of the Hulk’s genesis. So I turned to Origins of Marvel Comics.

The book, with the cool John Romita Sr. cover, was so damn cool when it came out in 1974. Not only the origins of multiple heroes, plus several stories from later in their various series, but Lee’s account of how he created all of them. And to be clear, he gets all the credit for their genesis. He conceived of the Fantastic Four, the Hulk, Thor (Marvel’s version, anyway), Spidey and Dr. Strange (Namor doesn’t get his origin in this book, just a crossover with the Hulk). He also invented characterization and realistic dialog in a genre devoid of it. The artists — and he does lavish praise on them — then transformed his ideas into visual form, then he dialogued it.

As John Morrow and Tom Brevoort have both chronicled, that isn’t true. Not only did the artists do a lot of the plotting under the “Marvel method” of the 1960s but Steve Ditko and Jack Kirby played a larger role in creating the characters than Lee gives them credit for here. As noted at the second link, it’s possible Lee did come up with the idea for a character named Spider-Man but it’s also possible Kirby did. Either way, there’s solid evidence Kirby developed the character and drew a few pages only for Ditko to spot that Kirby modeled him on an earlier non-Marvel creation. At which point either Ditko or Lee or both fleshed out the Peter Parker we know.

In the case of the Hulk, Lee claims in origins he was inspired by multiple sources: the Thing’s popularity in Fantastic Four, the tragic figure of the Frankenstein creature, and decided to throw in Jekyll and Hyde as well. I don’t buy the Frankenstein angle — Hulk’s a nasty brute here and not at all sympathetic — and my friend Ross and I agree Hulk’s origin looks closer to a knockoff of Amazing Colossal Man. In that Bert I.Gordon film a soldier drags a man away from a nuclear test site, gets caught in the blast and transformed into a monster.

Jack Kirby, however, claims he came up with the Hulk, a spinoff from one of his other monster stories. Kirby (who provides that first coer) isn’t necessarily accurate either, as he claims he came up with the FF, Spidey and the Hulk back in 1959, two years before the FF appeared (so why the delay?). Though it’s just as likely as Lee coming up with it.

Of course it’s quite possible parts of all these stories are true. Kirby could have come up with the core character, then Lee introduced the Jekyll/Hyde aspect. Same thing if Amazing Colossal Man was the inspiration — and no question, giving the Hulk a part time human identity made him a much more successful series character. Well, sort of. Sales were anemic, for whatever reason (possibly because they kept changing the rules to make the character work) and the book was almost canceled after three issues (it made six). A couple of years later, they tried again with Steve Ditko as artist and co-plotter, and this time it worked. See the link for my thoughts on why.

Lee didn’t always deny his artists’ contributions — the Morrow shows that as Marvel took off in the Silver Age, Lee frequently did give them credit, but he was somewhat more likely to deny they’d done anything but draw. This inevitably led to some buffs claiming Lee contributed nothing but I don’t agree; comparing his work with Ditko on Spider-Man (including the classic cover here) or with Kirby on FF and Thor to their later work without Lee — don’t get me wrong, they did good work post-Silver Age, but Lee definitely brought something to the table. And managed to do good work with other artists such as Marie Severin, Romita Sr. and Jim Mooney too.

By 1974, however, Lee was Marvel’s top dog and Ditko and Kirby were long gone from the Bullpen (though they’d return to do more work eventually). If he wanted to paint himself as an auteur, there was no-one to call him on it. So no, I can’t be certain Lee conceived Hulk or that he conceived him as a Jekyll/Hyde riff. But as I can’t rule it out, the Hulk goes in the book.

1 Comment

Filed under Comics, Reading