Monthly Archives: May 2010

Kirby’s legacy

Jack Kirby’s heirs have told Marvel that they’re revoking the copyright Kirby granted back in the seventies for the various creations he’d provided them. Marvel (and Disney, which now owns Marvel) is fighting back, arguing that Kirby was doing work-for-hire so all rights belong to the company.
The article at the link speculates that the probable outcome will be the heirs regranting the copyrights for the indefinite future, in return for a hefty payout. There’s also discussion in the comments of whether the heirs could yank anything away (Stan Lee apparently accepted a deal giving his share of the copyrights to Marvel, so that might mean the heirs are only co-owners at best) and one deliciously sneaky (though highly improbable) suggestion that this would give Disney some legal ground for revoking other studios’ Marvel licenses.
But what really struck me was the comments attacking the heirs for even trying this:
What right do they have to the money? They didn’t create anything!
Kirby’s kids should be grateful Marvel enabled him to support them all those years and just shut up!
Kirby’s kids should be grateful Marvel is keeping their father’s creations in the public eye and just shut up!
I won’t bother refuting the points (the other comments at the link do that), but it’s unsettling that so many people side with Disney/Marvel, even given that this is partly fansquawking (i.e., the primary concern is that their favorite comics or movie series will be shut down).
True, Kirby’s kids haven’t created anything, but neither have the suits at Disney (and while Joe Quesada at Marvel has done some creating, he certainly can’t claim credit for Kirby’s work). So why is it fairer for the company to get the millions than the heirs?
And to say the family should just be grateful Marvel deigned to pay their father for his work? It’s not like Marvel was performing an act of charity; hiring Kirby was a business transaction. He was talented and creative and made a lot more money for them than for himself. And he was a freelancer, not an employee creating on company time.
It’s the same tone I heard in a lot of right-wing pundits back when the auto companies were applying for bailouts: They’d mock the executives for pleading poverty after flying the company jet to DC, then conclude that the only fit punishment was to gut the union workers’ salaries! Why do those peons think they deserve more than their bosses want to pay them?
Maybe that explains why the working class (and the middle class too) keep falling further and further behind: There are too many people (outside the executive suite) who just assume that the free market is completely fair and if you’re losing out, it must be your fault.

1 Comment

Filed under Politics, Reading

Movies I’ve been watching

REANIMATOR (1984) is Stuart Gordon’s adaptation of one of the minor HP Lovecraft stories that turns it into a gory, black-humored, thoroughly entertaining film about restoring life to the dead and a disembodied head’s plot to raise a zombie army. Wonderful fun. “Your theories of brain death are twenty years out of date!’
REANIMATOR RESURRECTUS (2004) is the making-of documentary that came with the Reanimator DVD I bought; the biggest surprise to me was that Stuart Gordon started out in serious theater (“The Organic Theater premiered Mamet’s Sexual Perversity in Chicago.”) before starting to think about doing a Frankenstein film. And then a friend suggested a story called “Herbert West Reanimator” by some guy named Lovecraft (which explains why he started with that rather than one of the a-list stories—and his willingness to rehearse his actors in contrast to the usual low-budget rush job explains a lot too). This fills in some of what was dropped as they went along (establishing the villainous Hill had hypnotic powers even before he was beheaded) and discussions as to what made it work (“Every character has an arc—even the dean goes from a respectable college head to a drooling undead maniac!”) and Gordon’s cheerful admission that this will probably remain the high-water mark of his career (“Every movie I make, they say it’s not as good as Reanimator—but this film enabled me to have a career in movies.”). Interesting.
DRUNKEN ANGEL (1948) was Akira Kurosawa’s first team-up with Toshiro Mifune, here playing a tubercular Yakuza in post-war Japan who bonds with the gruff drunk of a local doctor despite Mifune’s refusal to follow doctor’s orders to stave off death. Reminiscent of the Italian neo-realists of the period in its seedy setting and gloomy plot; the emphasis on the Yakuza code of honor being bullshit (“Don’t give me any of that feudal loyalty crap!”) makes me suggest double-billing with REMAINS OF THE DAY for similar cynicism about honor and duty. “A Yakuza can always be trusted to do the wrong thing.”
WONDER WOMAN (2009) is a weak animated reworking of WW’s’s origin wherein the escape of Ares (Alf Molina) from Paradise Isle results in Princess Diana (Keri Russell) winning a contest to return to the outside world and take him down, with the help of skirt-chaser Steve Trevor (Nathan Filion). Didn’t do anything for me vocally or dramatically, though it does show how Amazon Warrior has become the standard interpretation of Wonder Woman these days. “Your daughter has a great rack.”
AVANTI (1972) is the charming story of stressed-out businessman Jack Lemmon arriving in Italy to pick up his late father’s body and discovering his long-term relationship with Juliet Mills’ mother, with the inevitable result of the next generation following in their parents’ footsteps. Surprising to think something this light-hearted came from the same brain as Double Indemnity and Sunset Boulevard (also surprising to realize it’s a Filmed Play since it doesn’t feel like it at all). “My uncle is a cardinal-do you think I would lie?”
ST. ELMO’S FIRE (1985) was the Brat Pack’s shot at adult roles (not having seen this since it came out, it’s startling how young they look now) as a newly graduated pack of college friends (Timothy Hutton, Mare Winningham, Judd Nelson, Demi Moore, Emilio Estevez, Rob Lowe and Ally Sheedy) grapple with job problems, relationship problems and drug problems on the course to maturity. Certainly better than many other films with similar themes. “No-he isn’t sleeping with the fat chick.”
Despite all the unfavorable comparisons of Pierce Brosnan’s Bond to Daniel Craig’s that I’ve seen, TOMORROW NEVER DIES (1997) shows Brosnan was good in the role, as he and Chinese agent Michelle Yeoh and Pierce Brosnan try to thwart Jonathan Pryce’s scheme to touch off a China-UK war with Teri Hatcher caught in the crossfire (I’m inclined to agree with one film book’s description of her as “this is what happens to the Bond girls right after they make love at the end of the movie.”). “I think your employment with us is ended.”
HOW TO TRAIN YOUR DRAGON (2010) is a fun animated fantasy in which the son of a Viking chieftain locked in battle with local swarms of dragons befriends one of the deadliest of them all and begins to suspect that the two sides needn’t be locked in mortal battle-and that there might be something more terrible to worry about. Charming; with Gerard Butler as the dad and David Tennant as one of the supporting voices. “Take this helmet-it’s made from one of your mother’s breastplates.”
FOUR ROOMS (1995) is a slight Plaza Suite style comedy in which worried bellhop Tim Roth must cope with deranged sexpot Jennifer Beals, a coven of witches (including Ione Skye and Madonna) that needs his sperm and the rebellious toddlers of Antonio Banderas and Joan Chen during one New Year’s Eve event. This gained its main claim to fame from having Quentin Tarantino in a supporting role right after Pulp Fiction, and it doesn’t have much else going for it. “You will come when we call you.”

1 Comment

Filed under Movies

Books I’ve been reading

THE SHAKESPEARE RIOTS: Revenge, Drama and Death in Nineteenth-Century America by Nigel Cliff chronicles how the rival New York Shakespearian performances of American-born stage star Edwin Forrest and British William Charles Macready triggered a series of aggressive stunts by Forrest’s supporters (who regarded the dominance of English actors on stage as a form of cultural imperialism), that then turned violent in response to a police crackdown. Cliff shows that the violence had less to do with the performances themselves than generally sour Anglo-American relations and class warfare (deriding popular actors was one of the ways the lower classes were allowed to blow off steam and they didn’t take lightly to having it cut off); he also goes into the basics of 19th century Shakespearian acting (Macready was a groundbreaker in trying to develop his character from his own inner resources rather than stock gestures), the actors’ life, and Shakespeare’s popularity in America during this period, which Cliff sees as the last gasp before the 19th century fossilized him as a fusty classic.
THIRD CRY TO LEGBA: Selected Stories of Manley Wade Wellman Vol. 1 gathers together all of the Lee Corbett stories (most of them I already read in VALLEY SO LOW) and Wellman’s 1940s stories of New York-based occult investigator John Thunstone and his battles with Crowley-clone Rowley Thorne, the nonhuman Shonokin (who also showed up in one of Silver John’s novels) and the sinister School of Darkness. The Thunstone stories are good, but suffer by comparison with Silver John’s first-person narration and Appalachian setting; a bigger problem is that the powers of darkness come off ineffective: A stab of Thunstone’s silver sword or a puff of tobacco laced with shaman’s herbs will usually dispel them.
STARDUST LOST: The Triumph, Tragedy and Mishugas of the Yiddish Theater in America by Stefan Kanfer looks back at the Yiddish-language theater that began a little over a century ago, largely due to the efforts of matinee idol Boris Thomachefsky (whose name has now been preserved as the mentor of Max Bialystock in the PRODUCERS musical) and eventually expired late in the 20th century (by which point English was the default language even for Jewish playwrights). Kanfer portrays a familiar mix of outsize egos, backstage feuds and politics (Zionism and Bolshevism mostly) plus the challenge of catering to an immigrant audience with little familiarity with theater, so that low-brow “shund” went over far better than anything good (years before Fiddler on the Roof, Sholom Alecheim’s tales of Tevya were rejected as too serious and thoughtful to work); Yiddish theater, did, however, manage several impressive productions, including Jewish versions of King Lear, Hamlet (with a woman duplicating Sarah Bernhardt’s turn in the role) and Merchant of Venice (the first recorded instance of a Jew taking the lead). Kanfer argues that while Yiddish theater has Gone To Dust, it’s influence is still alive and kicking, ranging from influential graduates (Stella Adler and Paul Muni) to Jewish shticks that carried over into the mainstream.
THE LITTLE STRANGER by Sarah Waters has the feel of an M.R. James story expanded to novel length as a doctor in post-WW II Britain notices an increasing level of weirdness surrounding a local Stately Home and the shabbily genteel family struggling to keep it afloat (very much in tune with the real-world situation chronicled in Decline and Fall of the British Aristocracy). Stretching M.R. James to 400 pages doesn’t work so well, and the personal drama which is meant to be the heart of the story didn’t work for me at all.
BPRD: The War on Frogs is a TPB collection of retcons set during the BPRD’s battles with the monstrous spawn of the Jaghru Ogad, and giving us new looks at Roger the homonculus and Capt. Daimo; the best is the medium Joachim trying to help the devil-frogs’ ghosts go into the light.

1 Comment

Filed under Reading

What was Lost is found

And so after what seems like long, interminable years, Lost is over. I can’t say I’ll miss it.
It’s not like there wasn’t lots of good stuff in it: As a movie or a movie trilogy, it could have been incredible. But on a weekly basis, the stuff I didn’t like dominated—most notably, the way everyone seems determined to go about their business the first couple of seasons and try to ignore the weirdness. Or Locke would sit around issuing mystic hints and smirking at his deep knowledge—and that was all the information we’d get for half a season (I go into this side of things here).
The characters were good, mark you, but the story seemed stretched out to infinity (creeping in that petty pace from week to week); I know a few fans who blame the remaining unanswered questions on getting cut off by the network too soon; I don’t think we’d have ever gotten much more.
Which is my big complaint: Given all the mystery and hinted at secrets, I think more answers would have been good. What was the meaning of the numbers? Why was Claire’s child so important? Why couldn’t children be born on the island? And so on.
The entertaining Mighty God King blog has gone into this in several posts this week; in one, he offers solutions to the remaining mysteries. Unfortunately, a large number about to “Jacob has powers” or “The island is mysterious.” If they were actually writing from that basis, that’s pretty sloppy—it makes Star Trek’s “yee-ha physics” (as a friend put it) rigorous and logical.
One of the commenters on one post argued that obviously (as MGK’s post proves) there were solutions, and it’s not the writers’ fault if we’re too lazy to put the pieces together. Speaking as a comics fan (which means I’ve been concocting retcon explanations for continuity errors most of my life), that’s codswallop: Being able to explain a discontinuity or unanswered puzzle doesn’t mean the writers had that in mind or that therefore the story was perfectly logical all along.
All that being said, I enjoyed the finalé. It didn’t make a lot of logical sense (and as one critic pointed out, it means the entire parallel-world storyline had nothing to do with the main plot and didn’t affect it) but seeing everyone together at the end was tremendously satisfying. So a pleasant goodbye, but I wish their visit had been at least two seasons shorter.

1 Comment

Filed under Movies

Worlds enough and time

The trouble with a writing career is that there’s always something more I can do.
Another eHow. A bit more work on a short story. A new draft of some idea floating around in my head.
I think one reason I was stressed out for a while was that with my schedule upended by the census work, I didn’t know where to draw the line. I’ve lost some of the time I’d be writing, and I anticipate losing more; if the census work goes well and I get an early evening, I feel like the free time should immediately be put to better use than say, reading or watching a DVD. Because who knows how much I’ll have tomorrow.
So I’ve decided I need a tighter schedule. X amount of time on the census (with eHow to fill the gaps), Y amount of writing. And when it’s finished … I stop and relax.
Depending how much census work I get, I may adjust the exact quotas as I go along. It seems a shame not to make the most of the job opportunity while I have it; on the other hand, I will NOT wind up shoving my fiction aside.
So the exact formula may require some tinkering, but at least for the moment I have one.

Leave a comment

Filed under Personal, Writing

One more parallel-world post

Since I brought the subject up, let me touch briefly on one of the hoariest parallel-world/time-travel cliches: The exact double of the protagonist’s lover.
In the Bing Crosby version of A Connecticut Yankee at King Arthur’s Court, Crosby falls madly for a young noblewoman whom he leaves behind when he’s yanked back to the present. Surprise!—he runs into her distant descendant and exact lookalike, so he hasn’t lost her after all!
Likewise, in Quest for Love, the protagonist is yanked into a parallel world where his counterpart is an obnoxious shit and has to win back said counterpart’s lovely young wife, Joan Collins. When he returns to our world after her death from a heart weakness, he runs a desperate race to find her counterpart before she dies from the same weakness (and succeeds).
In both cases, the assumption is that it “is” the same person, even though it obviously isn’t: A 20th century woman is not going to be the same as her Arthurian-era ancestor, and the two Collins have lived very different lives (they’re more like identical twins separated in childhood).
Not that I can’t buy it if I like the movie, but it’s still slightly ridiculous.

6 Comments

Filed under Movies

Parallel worlds

As I work through the Essential Avengers Vol. 3,I reached one of my favorite stories, Avengers Annual 2. In it, the Avengers (Goliath, Wasp, Black Panther, Captain America, Hawkeye) return from a time trip and discovers the Scarlet Centurion (aka Kang the Conqueror) has altered time so that the original Avengers team (Giant-Man, Wasp, Thor, iron Man, Hulk) have become dictators. The current Avengers, naturally set things to rights.
One thing that struck me rereading the story was that the regular team is absolutely freaked to discover they and the world they knew no longer exist. These days that sort of cosmic weirdness is taken so routinely, it was refreshing to see them react the way most people would.
Another thing was that Marvel’s concept of the multiverse, as fleshed out in the 1980s, pretty much kills the story. As developed by then editor/writer Mark Gruenwald, every major event splits off in two ways (Galactus eats the world/Galactus doesn’t eat the world; Spider-Man lets the burglar go/Spider-Man catches the burglar and Uncle Ben lives) and no timeline can be erased: The Avengers returned to “reality” but the oppressed Earth endured behind them.
This makes their triumph a lot less satisfying, since there’s no sign the evil Avengers will lose their grip on the world.
And more generally, it’s a lousy idea. As Larry Niven pointed out in “All the Myriad Ways,” if every event diverges, then nothing we do amounts to everything. Every triumph is matched by a defeat; every survival is matched by a death. Victory is meaningless, nothing but a blind roll of the quantum-mechanical dice, if it’s paired every time with defeat.
Comics have always assumed that some events would split reality in two, but making it every single possible event just never worked for me.
Funny, I thought I had more of a post in mind, but I think I’m just rambling. So I’ll stop now.

Leave a comment

Filed under Reading

The good, the bad, the ugly

The good: Fire From Space needs just one more proof and it’s ready to go.
The bad: Census work is still slow. I’m hoping to do a lot of eHow today to make up for it.
The ugly: Okay, there is no ugly.

Leave a comment

Filed under Personal, Short Stories

Books I’ve read

In The Ornament of the World: How Muslims, Jews and Christians Created a Culture of Tolerane in Medieval Spain, Maria Rosa Menocal describes how the Muslim conquerors of “al-Andalus” took seriously Islam’s teaching that Christians and Jews should be welcomed as people of the book; for several centuries this led to Christians and Jews playing important roles in Muslim states. Menocal argues Arabic was a key part of the bonding, since although the language of holiness like Hebrew and Latin, it could also be used for poetry and secular works, which opened new vistas to the non-Arabs of Spain (a flowering of Hebrew poetry, for example). A book that lives up to its critical praise—and has inspired me to write a story set in this era, eventually.
REEL V. REAL: How Hollywood Turns Fact Into Fiction by Frank Sanello only goes to show that writing a serious book about historical films is tough (there’s only a couple of the many I’ve read that I liked)—though in fairness, I’ve read enough on the subject that my disinterest is because much of what Sanello says is familiar to me. That being said, some of his criticism is silly (objecting to the musical 1776 as unhistorical reminds me of the people who said The Pajama Game didn’t represent the real state of labor negotiations in the garment industry) and some is just baffling (the fact that Antitrust has a Bill Gates-knockoff as its villain hardly justifies treating it as a “based on truth” film).
Scotland Yard is hot on THE TRAIL OF FU MANCHU in the wake of Sax Rohmer’s previous book, as the Devil Doctor is cut off from his resources and forced to go to ground in England, though playing defense doesn’t stop him playing such trump cards as re-enslaving Petrie’s daughter and manufacturing gold out of human flesh (not to mentioning poisoning Fah Lo Suee, though I won’t bet on it lasting). A good one, though the constant hints about Fu’s Egyptian ancestry are sometimes a strain—are there really that many people who could recognize that he looks like Pharaoh Seti I?
SHARPE’S BATTLE: Spain, 1811 was the first of Cornwall’s retcons (though given how much detail he goes into on Sharpe’s India years, I suspect he was laying plans for the others already), in which Sharpe’s decision to execute two French soldiers caught mid-rape leads to a clash with the ruthless French general Le Loup, a politically-inspired court-martial and a desperate attempt to redeem himself at the battle of Fuentes des Oñoro. A good one, and I’m fairly sure the spymaster Ducos (here trying to sow dissent among the Irish troops) returns in later books.
AT THE WATER’S EDGE: Macroevolution and the Transformation of Life by Carl Zimmer is an excellent science/evolutionary history of how our ancestors left the water, how some of them wound up going back and how researchers put the picture together. Of great interest to me for showing how many theories have been revamped since the days I was a bio major—lungs, it turns out, actually preceded swim bladders instead of evolving from them (“The fact that the fish line with swim bladders came to vastly outnumber the lungfish confused the issue.”) and the development of hard-shelled eggs is no longer what made it possible for tetrapods to move from the amphibian phase (“Amphibians have a variety of means for laying eggs on land.”).
SPIDER-GIRL: Who Killed Gwen Reilly? is a TPB from the Marvel’s Spider-Girl series, in which the daughter of Peter Parker (in a parallel world where the Marvel Universe has aged roughly 20 years) must cope with a clone moving in and becoming her sister, the return of the Green Goblin’s disciple Fury and a gang war erupting in New York. As always, an entertaining read.
E.C. SEGAR’S COMPLETE POPEYE: Well blow me down is the second volume in Fantagraphics’ reprint of Segar’s Thimble Theater strip, wherein Popeye copes with third-world revolution, his romance with Olive Oyl and the meanest town on the Wild West. Definitely taking the shape I’m familiar with as Olive’s brother Castor fades away while a new character called Wimpy steps on-stage (“I’ll gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today.”) Still fun, 80 years later—it’s remarkable how much entertainment Segar could get just out of Popeye’s ability to take a licking and keep on ticking.
WITCHFINDER: In the Service of Angels by Mike Mignola is a spin-off from the Hellboy series in which Victorian occult investigator Edward Grey discovers an archeological expedition has unleashed the ghost of a subterranean monster which has returned to London to kill, and kill, and kill again! Not as much fun as Mignola’s pulp crimefighter, Lobster Johnson, but still well worth reading.

1 Comment

Filed under Reading

No battle plan ever survives first contact with the enemy

Which is to say, census work is disrupting my schedule more than I thought.
It’s not that there’s been a huge amount of work yet, it’s just that after three months of forty-hour weeks, it’s more tiring than I thought to push back up to fifty-plus, which is what I need to write and enumerate both. And while it’s great that a lot of my work to date has been done in the afternoon, doing the census in the evening would be more productive: I’m not going to put in three or four solid hours of writing in the evening because I’ve got TYG to spend time with (it’s not like she’s forcing me or anything—she’s the woman I love and my top priority).
Plus, my theory that “Well, I can just add a few eHows on days when the census is slow” hasn’t worked out as well as I thought.
I think part of it is also that I’m still feeling some pressure working on the Applied Science series. I’ve never had a deadline for fiction before; I’d just work at it and work at it until it was done. Knowing it has to be done by deadline is a very different situation, especially when I lost so much time during the move, and then finishing The Enemy Within (which has been renamed by McFarland, with my permission, as Screen Enemies of the American Way).
Too bad, so sad, I guess: The work needs to be done, so off I go to do it.

Leave a comment

Filed under Personal, Screen Enemies of the American Way, Short Stories