Tag Archives: religion

Christianity has been wanted and never tried

The title comes from a G. K. Chesterton quote: Christianity has not been tried and found wanting, it’s been found wanting and never tried.

It’s true in the sense that for most of Christianity’s history we’ve not even tried to live up to the standards set by our faith. However it also comes close to the “no true Scotsman” argument that the ugly behavior of so many Christians is not real Christianity.

I’ve become quite jaded about my faith over the past few years. Seeing the religious right are even more disgusting than I used to think. The long list of church officials engaged in sex crimes (and the churches that turned a blind eye). The conviction that contrary to Jesus if they gain the world but lose their soul, that’s a win. Their refusal to break with the Necrotic Toddler on any point —and then whining when they’re criticized over it. Even if they assume the Toddler is doing god’s work in some fashion (most obviously ending Roe) it doesn’t follow everything he does must be godly — King David was god’s anointed but the Uriah-Bathsheba business was not.

Their view of religious freedom is very much “freedom for us, not for others.” It’s perfectly fine for them to punish LGBTQ individuals based on their religious views but pro-immigrant Christians should remember we separated church from state — their views don’t count.

Then there’s Minneapolis, where the Toddler’s ICE storm troopers have imposed a state of siege. It’s bad, and people have suffered horribly, like a five-year-old ICE kidnapped from Minneapolis to Texas without telling his family And ICE claims that they are not bound by the Fourth Amendment. And now a second murder (more here) and Kristi “Nazi” Noem lying about it. I’d say more but I don’t think I have insights that haven’t already been said.

Despite which, Minnesotans are refusing to submit and give in, including a number of Christians. Here’s one example: “Ben, 17, and Sam, 16, donned warm hoodies, said goodbye to their parents and piled into a well-loved sedan. Cranking the engine, they skirted a wild turkey that stalks their yard and headed out to find U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents.”

On the other side, a pastor prays God will smite Minneapolis for defying ICE.

One pastor at Cities Church (which seems to be creepy right-wing patriarchal) turns out to be an ICE official. It seems a numbe rof people are fine with a Christian leader being in charge of such non-Christian behavior but they’re horrified people disrupted church services to protest. As noted at the link, it’s unlikely any well-behaved protest would have done better. JD Vance, for instance, complains that people should confine themselves to writing letters to the editor or talking about things on social media — not anything that would stir things up.

Switching to another topic, a Catholic racist discusses online how he only takes communion from white people, then brags that he goes to confession about it, therefore his shitty sins are forgiven (that is not, from what I’ve read, how confession works). Fred Clark suggests what the dude wants is absolution without repentance — someone to assure him he’s not one of the bad racists, even as he continues being racist. Hindu extremists are trying to turn the case into a tool for competing nationalism.

Clark again: “White evangelicalism has been captured by the Republican Party and vice versa, but neither variant of the merged product encourages or permits what Dad once believed about what it means to “look American,” or about who is and is not “precious” in the sight of Jesus.”

To wrap up, here’s a story from last year about how New Orleans’ football team helped the local Catholic Church’s reputation management after the abuse scandal became public.

2 Comments

Filed under Politics

Random links about religion

Years ago, evangelist Billy Graham established an Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability to oversee church finances and ensure everything was on the up and up. Now they’re adding a new standard, that boards are watching over church leaders’ integrity. Which seems like an excellent idea given church leaders perform plenty of sinning and boards often do nothing. And more sinning. And. And. Nevertheless, Billy Graham’s son Franklin has withdrawn the Graham ministry from the ECFA over the new rules. As Slacktivist says, “When somebody literally runs away from accountability, you’ve got to ask why.”

“To James, “the world” refers to the systems and structures and Powers That Be that deny the worth and humanity of those orphans and widows, the aliens and the poor. To be polluted by the world is to accept what “the world” tells us about them — that they don’t matter, that their distress is just how it is or, even worse, that their distress is what they deserve.”

“This is how we conquer the hatred and prejudice of the world: not with an eye for an eye, but with an inundation of love.

Oklahoma state Senator Dusty Deevers, a self-righteous theocrat misogynist, who unsurprisingly thinks separating church and state violates his rights. I guarantee if a Christian America embraces some version of theocracy that doesn’t fit Deevers’ beliefs, he’ll be screaming about tyranny. The same for theocratic creep Joshua Haymes who claims “liberalism is a greater threat to the US than neo-Nazism, and that the Bible is “pro-Ice raids”. On X, he has also advocated for capital punishment for adultery and abortion, and appeared to call for the drowning of LGBTQ+ Pride marchers.” If your religion thinks liberals are worse than neo-Nazis …

Homophobic hatemonger Tony Perkins is optimistic the Necrotic Toddler he reveres will convince Americans dictatorship is good.

“Rep. Mary Miller (R-Ill.) … Miller wrote on X that the man, Giani Surinder Singh, “should never have been allowed” to lead the prayer and called for Congress to uphold the “truth” that “America was founded as a Christian nation.” George Washington would like a word.

Is there a difference between Christian leaders and D&D dungeon masters?

“The Civil Rights Movement and the brief Second Reconstruction it produced were not about sex, drugs, and rock & roll.”

What Johnson, Deevers, Perkins and other believers in theocracy don’t admit or don’t grasp: “the establishment of one, official state religion might inhibit the freedom of those not belonging to the One True Official Sect, but they don’t perceive how such an establishment also fundamentally alters the relationship of members of that official sect to their own church — requiring lockstep assent to its official doctrines and practices as set forth thereafter by its official and legal enforcers.

The establishment of any sect casts suspicion on all members of that sect. Coerced belief is belief that cannot be trusted. Coerced belief, therefore, will never be trusted — it will be dis-trusted, inspected, codified, measured and forced to demonstrate its loyalty and legitimacy time and again.”

3 Comments

Filed under Politics

Evil in both fact and fiction

Buck v. Bell was the landmark Supreme Court case a century ago that legalized sterilizing the “feebleminded,” with Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. sneering that “three generations of imbeciles is enough.” In IMBECILES: The Supreme Court, American Eugenics and the Sterilization of Carrie Buck, Adam Cohen shows what a monstrous miscarriage of justice this was.

Carrie Buck was a perfectly normal woman (not that it would be okay to sterilize her if she had been mentally handicapped) whose foster parents sent her to a colony for the feebleminded and epileptic (RFK Jr.’s talk of shipping people out to farms has a long tradition) because she was oversexed and had a kid out of wedlock (mental disability=uncontrollable sex drive is a stereotype of long standing). In reality one of their relatives raped her and they wanted to avoid scandals. The eugenics movement was losing steam and so various officials hit on the idea of a court case that would set a precedent, and picked Buck. In a kangaroo court hearing they presented her as one in a chain of low-IQ individuals without even testing her daughter or telling Buck what was at stake.

The result is an impressively awful account of the authorities failing the most vulnerable. It also shows Holmes was a generally horrible justice and person who wrote to a friend once about how nauseated he felt at people saying we should feel compassion and sympathy for the weak.

TheMy Genre Book Club’s October pick was Thriller/Horror which led me to reread USHER’S PASSING by Robert MacCammon, which opens with one of the “real” Ushers confronting Edgar Allan Poe over turning rumors he’d heard about the family and the Usher Malady into fiction. Fast-forward to now (i.e., 1984) when angsty, frustrated writer Rix Usher returns to the munitions-manufacturing family’s North Carolina estate where his father lies dying of the Malady (it gets them all eventually). What follows is a Southern Gothic with a helping of Tennessee Williams — the family includes a mom clinging to old-school proprieties, junkie daughter, wimpy Rix, drunken jock brother and sexually frustrated wife. Mixed in with it all we have a strange mutant panther stalking the nearby woods, telekinetic poor whites, the murderous Pumpkin Man — and what is the horror in the unused building on the estate?

This was a lot of fun but the last 20 percent starts to get way overstuffed as MacCammon keeps throwing stuff in — an Usher doomsday weapon they’re about to put on the market gets squeezed in and treated as a B-plot (or maybe a C-plot). Still, I enjoyed rereading it.

I reread C.S. Lewis’ THE SCREWTAPE LETTERS after reading Dr. Laura Robinson’s critique of why Lewis’ story works when imitators fall flat — and she’s spot on.

The story concerns the eponymous Screwtape, a demon bureaucrat instructing his nephew Wormwood in how to tempt and corrupt Wormwood’s human “patient.” Screwtape understands much about human weakness though he’s baffled by love and decency; the number one rule of the universe is to look out for number one and nobody else so how can “the Enemy” possibly care about humans? What’s his real game?

As Robinson says, one of the reasons the book works is that it focuses so much on human weakness. It doesn’t matter which church the patient goes to; it might matter a great deal that they’re contemptuous of other churches, or that Wormwood convinces the patient to look down his nose at his fellow parishioners. It doesn’t matter what the patient reads; it’s very bad that he reads for pleasure rather than, say, to impress his friends or because all the cool kids are reading it. Genuine pleasure is a thing of the Enemy and should be fought at all times, like serious thought or moral questioning. The Enemy wants people thinking whether a course of action is good and attainable; better for Hell that they ask “Is it in accordance with the general movement of our time?” (which seems to be how the sensible centrists roll).

This stuff is timeless in a way that specific Thou Shalts and Thou Shalts Nots wouldn’t have been. As witness when Lewis does get away from that — discussing the nature of marriage, for instance — I find myself in disagreement (in fairness our concept of a good marriage has changed a lot in 85 years). The later essay includec with this book, Screwtape Proposes a Toast drives that home by falling flat on its face. In this follow-up Screwtape gives a long toast at an infernal banquet that boils down to What’s Wrong With Kids These Days. Even though the complaints are timeless — 50 years later, Screwtape would have been whining about participation trophies — the essay isn’t. And it’s only intermittently funny.

The original remains brilliant.

All rights to images remain with current holders.

2 Comments

Filed under Politics, Reading

Zohran Mamdani and James Dobson

(I’d throw in something about Jeremy Epstein but I’m saving that for a bigger post).

It appears China wants Eric Adams to stay mayor of New York. Why? To quash dissent among the 600,000 Chinese-Americans in NYC and because “Beijing is also making a longer bet, she said: You never know which politician might eventually run for Congress at the national level, or become a presidential candidate.'”

Oh, side note, saying that giving reporters envelopes stuffed with cash is a “bold departure from political norms” seems very … euphemistic. Which seems to be NYT style these days. Mamdani responded better: “it is the despair and the disaffection that New Yorkers hold for politics that I am running against. And it is one that I do not blame them for, because if you were to see this each and every day, why would you believe in the promise of local government?”

J.D. Vance complaints, as so many people do with immigrants, that Mamdani should be more grateful to America instead of “attacking the U.S. for all of its problems.” Of course Vance might be grateful for living in a country that allowed him to rise from a struggling, dysfunctional family to vice president but he loves complaining about America’s problems with single women, immigrants, etc. Somehow that never applies to white guys.

Shifting from Mamdani, right-wing evangelical creep James Dobson died last month. As Mark Twain says, I’ve never wished a man dead but there are obituaries I’ve read with great pleasure. This was one of them. This is a man who supported the right of men to beat their wives — and suggests some women provoke their husbands because they know the men will be wracked by guilt (no, they won’t). He supported Roy Moore’s senate campaign, declaring Moore, the man who liked to lech on teenage girls when he was in his thirties, was a man of character. Which is true, but not the kind of character that deserves public office.

“James Dobson was a nasty dude. He liked to beat children and dogs with a belt and to rain misery and punishment on the vulnerable; we know all of this about him because he said as much in public, repeatedly, over a long and rancid public life.”

And one more: “You get one shot to treat your children with autonomy and dignity, and to model for them the kindness and love the world needs. No one is going to be a perfect parent, but treating your children like little soldiers you can train to fight in your culture war comes at a high price.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

The Felon of the United States is not King David and the religious right are not the prophets of Israel

The religious right have stated, and shown by their actions, that they’re giving the Felon a mulligan on everything he does wrong. Corruption? Rape? Collusion with Russia? Attempted coup? They ain’t sayin’ nothing, and as noted at the link, don’t think they should be judged for it. Of course they don’t — the one thing they can’t stand is being criticized by people they imagine are their moral inferiors (I’ve often thought part of the FOTUS’ appeal for them is that he whines about persecution as much as they do).

The rationale they’ve given is that even if the Felon is a bad man, God can work through bad men to achieve divine ends. Look at King David: a flawed man who sent Uriah off to die in battle so that he could bang his wife Bathsheba. Didn’t God use David to achieve greatness just the same? Cyrus the Great, the Persian emperor who restored the Jews to Israel also gets held up as the same sort of monarch.

The first problem with this, as right-wing misogynist Matt Walsh once said (possibly the only time I will ever agree with him on anything), is that the prophets of Israel did not give David a mulligan. They called him out on his sins, demanded he repent and warned him there would be a price to pay. The religious right won’t call the Felon out on anything; I’m sure they’re aware they’d lose their access and influence the first time they bruised his snowflake fee-fees. Nor will they ask him to repent (he claims he has nothing to repent for). And he’d go ballistic if anyone, including God, suggested there would be consequences for anything he’d done.

Instead, the religious right tongue bathes and adores Trump for helping them punch down at LGBTQ people, women and POC. And I’m sure some of the billionaire megachurch preachers love the big tax cuts. They’re closer to the court prophets of Ahab (a baaad king) than servants of God. Plus some of them are outright frauds.

Second, Tony Perkins and the other court prophets are just restating an old, old principle of politics: it’s okay when our side does it. Scream like hell when the other party’s candidate is caught having an affair, get defensive when your side does it. It’s not a universal law — Democrats are more likely to crack down on sexual harassers in their party than Republicans are — but it’s not unique to the religious right.

The trouble is, they want it both ways: they should be given a pass on pragmatic politics because that’s how the game is played but they also demand everyone regard them as principled champions of moral principles. They used to call for having godly candidates in office, now they don’t care, but they still get pissy about being judged.

When I posted on Facebook about the first newspaper reports about the Southern Baptists turning a blind eye to predators in pulpits, a Catholic friend of mine exploded: how could this paper attack Christianity like that? Don’t they realize we are all sinners? I’ve seen other Christians play that card, but they never apply it to people on the opposite side of the political aisle. Nor do I fancy the Felon’s prophets would appreciate being told that as they’re no better than anyone else, they’re in no position to opine on morality.

The King David defense is not a good one. If the religious right wants to gain a kingdom of this world, they should expect to be judged accordingly.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

Some links about religion

“At least 10 individuals have made sexual abuse or sexual misconduct allegations against Rivera, who is now on trial in Kane County, Illinois, on charges of felony sexual assault and predatory abuse of a victim under 13 years of age. Rivera also faces charges for two felony counts of criminal sexual assault of a separate alleged adult victim. 

Ruch is on leave after admitting he made serious mistakes in handling the abuse allegations against Rivera, including failing to initially tell members of the Upper Midwest Diocese about those allegations.”

“This constant reminder that “you were foreigners in Egypt” is not only a bit of persuasion. It’s also a threat. You were foreigners in Egypt and you were mistreated, despised, and oppressed. You remember that. And you also remember what happened to Egypt because of it.” — Slacktivist on Christianity and immigration.

“From religious communities to therapeutic spaces, the importance of forgiving those who’ve wronged us is often enshrined as an unqualified good. But what about horrifying cases of abuse, predatory behavior, or systemic wrong? Too often, when predators or abusers are exposed, the chorus comes immediately: “What about forgiveness?” In these cases, forgiveness places the onus on victims, diminishes real hurt and anger, lets perpetrators off the hook, and prevents justice from being done.”

Also from Slacktivist, on the same subject: “And as for “Heaven Has a Gate [and] a Wall,” well, yes, the vision of the New Jerusalem in Revelation does include a wall and a gate — twelve gates, actually. And here is what it says about that: On no day will its gates ever be shut, for there will be no night there. The glory and honor of the nations will be brought into it.”

“The liberalism on which the United States was founded in the late 1700s came from the notion—radical at the time—that individuals have rights and that the government generally must not intrude on those rights. This idea was central to the thinking of the Founders who wrote the Declaration of Independence, who put into the form of a mathematical constant—“we hold these truths to be self-evident”—the idea that “all men are created equal” and that they have the right to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness,” as well as the right to live under a government of their own choosing. ” — Heather Cox Richardson (yes, her substack letter also discusses religious freedom)

“From the pulpit to a prison cell, 37-year-old Demiro Rick Johnson will be 71 years old when he is released from prison and required to register as a sex offender for the remainder of his natural life, according to court documents obtained by The North Carolina Beat. On Friday, a judge sentenced Johnson, a now–convicted child sex predator for the statutory rape of a 14-year-old girl, whom he referred to as his “spiritual daughter” and who had attended his church.” Yes, it’s true predators and rapists exist in secular environments, but when the right wing starts pretending Christianity will elevate our moral discourse … well, it doesn’t.

See also: “A Triad pastor was charged with groping a man at Walmart, according to officials with the Mebane Police Department. On Monday, around 9 a.m., officers with the Mebane Police Department responded to the Walmart, located at 1318 Mebane Oaks Road. Jeffrey Smith, 67, was arrested and charged with one count of misdemeanor sexual battery. According to the arrest warrant, Smith was accused of approaching a man at Walmart and “touching the victim through his clothing.””

“These new leaders instead anticipate that the church will have to fight like (and against) hell to bring God’s kingdom to the earth, because Satan and his demonic minions will never cede the world without a fight. Victorious eschatology is optimistic about the future, but that optimism is premised on its adherents’ willingness to bring spiritual war to all non-Christian culture.”

Rep. Mike Johnson talks a lot about his Biblical worldview and his Christian morality. But he’s fine providing cover for alleged sex-trafficker Matt Gaetz.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

The poisonous tree, redux

As I’ve written before, the misogyny and racism in which much of conservative evangelical Christianity has rooted itself is a poisonous tree that can bear no good fruit. Would you like more examples? I hope so, as that’s what you’re getting.

Joel Webbon opposes women’s right to vote and advocates for Christian dictatorship. He also agrees with Confederate apologist Jon Harris that while Confederate generals and slaveholders have gone to heaven, abolitionists burn in Hell, as does Martin Luther King. They “were not the good guys.”

Speaking as a Christian, it’s entirely possible many slaveholders are in Heaven. It’s a creepy thought but the basic tenet of my faith is that anyone can receive absolution for sin. That includes the worst sins. Of course that applies to abolitionists too. They were the good guys; even if they weren’t, that wouldn’t stop them from achieving salvation. Harris argues (and Webbon agrees) it’s because they rejected the inspiration of scripture; as religious historian Mark Noll has shown, many abolitionists were inspired by Scripture, they just interpreted it differently from slaveowners. Nor have I ever heard of Martin Luther King rejecting Scripture.

Call me crazy, it sounds like Webbon thinks King and abolitionists were bad simply because they challenged white supremacy. Given his outrage at having non-whites in his neighborhood, it’s hardly off-brand for him.

Webbon also participated in drafting a statement on Christian nationalism which as the Libertarian Christian Institute says favors ethnonationalism over the idea that Christianity forges a new kinship between all believers. Which has never been a popular idea with white supremacists.

Webbon also believes in banning freedom of worship for anything he considers a false religion—private worship at home is fine, but nothing public. While he talks about Islam, would he consider a church that supports women’s right to vote or preach, or a black church marching for civil rights to be Christian? Would they lose their rights too? History shows religious governments get picky about who gets to qualify. I wonder the same thing about would-be theocrat (and flat-Earther) Kandiss Taylor. The poisonous tree is poisonous to Christians too.

Certainly Trump’s court prophets are PO’d that Christian figures spoke up at the DNC, insisting that while Trump — the convicted felon, liar, sexual assailant, scam artist and breaker of most of the commandments — is godly, supporting Democrats is not. A member of the forced-birth group Students for Life says, for example, that ““Hey maybe the party that promotes abortion through all nine months until birth and all kinds of sexual degeneracy shouldn’t be quoting from the Bible that condemns both.” Apparently he’s fine with Trump’s sexual degeneracy (and lots of Christians disagree about his interpretation of the Bible). I’m sure they’re freaking out that Evangelicals for Harris is a thing.

And of course, many of the religious leaders shrieking about Democrats’ sexual immorality are no paragons. Busted in a sex-trafficking sting. Or using a deepfake to link Kamala Harris to Jeffrey Epstein, then getting busted yourself for child sexual abuse. Or how about a pastor hiring a hitman to kill his daughter’s boyfriend?

They’re also shrieking, always, about how persecuted they are. And when the prophesied persecutions don’t happen — gay marriage, remember, meant they’d be forced to marry gay couples — they keep shrieking. Kamala Harris is the next Nero/antichrist/Diocletian who will persecute them by not letting them run the country.

As Fred Clark says, they seem tormented by finding Demon Commie Kamala kind of sexy. He also offers some good inside-baseball analysis of Webbon’s brand of Calvinism.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics, Undead sexist cliches

JD Vance does not have prophetic imagination

In The Prophetic Imagination, Walter Brueggemann argues that a true prophet sees the weakness of the established order and visualizes a new future, an unimaginable, better future. In the modern world, for example, Martin Luther King called out the rottenness and injustice of segregated, racist America and visualized the possibility of equality.

As Fred Clark says, JD Vance and the Republican Party can’t imagine anything but going back to the past: “As skeptics and critics of liberal democracy, what is it that they want to see liberal democracy replaced with? What’s their innovative big new idea? The short answer is they don’t have one. They want to see liberal democracy replaced with what came before it. That’s a problem because everybody hated what came before it. Everybody.”

Liberal democracy hasn’t made for a perfect world? Let’s get back to the era of national churches and religious power struggles that the First Amendment rejected.

No-fault divorce sometimes leads to bad outcomes? Get back to the days when battered wives were trapped in their marriages.

Do black families have problems? They’d all disappear if we went back to Jim Crow days.

Are their problems in schools? Get back to the days of imposing Christianity onto students. And if teachers don’t spout the “right” religious lessons, they’ll be punished. All to fight a non-existent state-sponsored atheism (pissed-off Christians have been equating freedom of religion (for other people) to atheism for decades).

Is the push for a more equal, more just society creating tension? Just stop trying and tell the Israelites to be content as slaves in Egypt.

It’s easy and comforting to imagine the past as a Garden of Eden. To suggest all we need to do is reverse course and head back there. It can’t be done — and the past Republicans want wasn’t Eden for anyone but WASP men. What we have to do is find a way forward to the New Jerusalem. It’s harder but the results will be better.

As I’m using so much religious language, let’s follow up with some religious links.

Conservative megachurch pastor Robert Jeffress says the fire that damaged his church was the work of Satan. Of course, if it had been a liberal church, he’d have been discussing how their pro-gay or pro-Harris positions brought down God’s wrath.

Case in point, John MacArthur (another megachurcher) thinks Biden’s administration is God’s judgment on America. While I would never suggest a prominent Christian preacher was a full of shit, MacArthur thinks Martin Luther King was not a Christian because racial equality isn’t Christian. So yeah, he is full of shit. Hateful shit.

Another case, Eric Metaxas complaining that ministers who don’t preach support for his politics will face divine judgment. Kandiss Taylor, flat-earther Georgia Republicans, wants executions.

“This is who James Dobson has always been. It is who all of the “religious right’s scary, judgmental old men” have always been. It should not be possible for anyone observing James Dobson in 2017 to be disappointed, because it should not be possible, in 2017, to have still retained any illusions about Dobson’s morality or honesty.”

“He’s a grifter with a bad case of the shut-eye — a snake-oil salesman who drinks a full case of his own bogus formula every day.” — Slacktivist Fred Clark on Roy Moore.

According to Trump court prophet Tony Perkins, “tolerance is not a Christian virtue.” Except tolerance for himself.

Here a Christian groomer, there a groomer, there another predator. And another. And another. As a Christian, I find this a useful reminder why putting the Ten Commandments or bringing back prayer in schools are not magic bullets that will make us all more moral.

“This is the guy who responded to Martin Luther King, Jr.‘s “Letter From Birmingham City Jail” by saying that civil rights leaders needed to “put the brakes on a little bit.” — from a post about putting up a statue of Billy Graham.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

Unsafe in any station: The case of Pastor Robert Morris shows how not to do it

“I was involved in inappropriate sexual behavior with a young lady in a home where I was staying. It was kissing and petting and not intercourse, but it was wrong. This behavior happened on several occasions over the next few years.” So says Gateway Church pastor/Trump spiritual advisor Robert Morris.

Morris, a megachurch superstar pastor, made the confession after the victim, Cindy Clemishire, recently went public. So it’s not like he was trying to do right by admitting his sin, it was just the usual CYA play. And not even true: as Fred Clark (and others) have pointed out, Clemishire was 12. That’s not a “young lady.” And she says “he did touch every part of my body and inserted his fingers into me,” which is a little more than “kissing and petting” implies. Morris makes it sound like some kind of forbidden love; “abuse” is closer to the mark.

I doubt this is a case of “power corrupts” — as writer Robert Caro put it, “power reveals.” Morris found himself in a position where he could indulge his desires, and those desires were indeed revealed. Contrary to Gateway Church’s denial that they knew about this when they hired Morris, Clemishire says she revealed the abuse to them too. They did nothing.

As Cato’s Letter a couple of centuries back put it, wickedness can flourish in any station unless we make it unsafe in any station. In Caro’s terms, we don’t know what wickedness might be revealed once someone gets the power to indulge it, or when they figure out the rules, the unwritten rules and what they can get away with.

Once wickedness starts flourishing it’s very, very hard to put it back in the bottle. In the 1990s, disgraced televangelist and convicted scamvangelist Jim Bakker admitted he’d sinned, had extramarital affairs and abused his pastoral office for personal gain. Two decades later he’d gone from apparently sincere repentance to painting himself as a cancel culture victim and hawking miracle cures and conspiracy theories on his show. The lure of religious celebrity and easy money was too much to resist.

Robert Morris seems to have suffered similar weakness. Morris’ statement to Gateway says that after it happened he confessed to his then-church, Shady Grove, and to Clemishire’s father. They asked him to step away from the ministry for two years and attend counseling, which he did. Except it appears he was lying: ““After a month of working nights as a security guard at Motel 6, I felt I had made great strides toward humility. I decided that perhaps I was ready to return to ministry.” That’s a quote from his book which refers to stepping away from Shady Grove over issues with pride, hence the “humility” reference.

I seriously doubt one month was enough to master his base impulses.

And that’s why, as Christian feminist Samantha Field once said, it’s not enough to trust sexual harassers or abusers to control themselves. The system they’re in has to take a stand and say no. It has to figure out what the organization did wrong that let the abuser get away with it: did they ignore warning signs or complaints? Did they decide the abuser was too valuable to take action (screenwriter Marti Noxon discusses encountering this in Hollywood)? Then fix the problem.

This isn’t easy — changing large organizations has been compared to teaching an elephant to dance — but it’s necessary. Setting new rules or benchmarks won’t do it if leadership doesn’t want to push change through: ““If your leadership lacks the requisite character and experience, no manual will help you. If you have the appropriate level of character and experience, no manual is necessary.”

That’s a problem with any organization. With right-wing churches it’s tougher because misogyny is part of their operating system. It’s easier to blame women for supposedly provoking men to rape than to blame men. After all, uncontrollable lust is part of being a guy: boys will be boys, men sleeping around is completely different from women doing it. If that masculinity occasionally crosses a line, punishing it would be an attack on men. NC Republican and wannabe governor Mark Robinson, for instance, dismisses charges against Roy Moore, Bill Cosby and Harvey Weinstein as some sort of feminist plot.

And so pastors prey and churches look aside. Or embrace them. No wonder they’re cool with Trump. Perhaps, as Fred Clark says, we should start posting the 10 Commandments on the walls of mega-churches. It seems pastors need it more than schoolkids.

For more examples of misogynist bullshit and double standards, read Undead Sexist Cliches, available as a Amazon paperback, an ebook and from several other retailers.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics, Undead sexist cliches

When JD Vance (and others) dream of tyranny, they expect to be holding the whip.

Sen. JD Vance is an enthusiastic Trump toady who thinks if Trump wins he should fire everyone in government who isn’t loyal to him, a standard lots of conservatives embrace. When one reporter asked Vance if he wasn’t calling for dictatorship, he didn’t deny it, just whined how unfair the question was. It’s unsurprising that like many conservatives, Vance thinks Hungarian dictator Viktor Orban’s tyranny has a lot to recommend it.

Republican officials are ducking and weaving when asked if they’ll support a Biden win in November. Which I translate as “if we can get away with a successful coup, we’ll support it but we’re not sure it’ll work.”

Meanwhile, Joel Webbon, conservative pastor is one of the right-wing Christians demanding a theocratic takeover: “Men must be governed. Now, ideally, men would govern themselves … but when you don’t have a populace that is capable of self-governance—when the fruit of the Spirit that is self-control has left the building for decades and nobody seems to have it—then men must be governed. And if they will not govern themselves, then someone else needs to govern them.”

What’s implicit in all these arguments (and those of other tyranny-supporters such as Curtis Yarvin) is that Vance and Webbon will be wielding the whip and laying down the law or least loyal acolytes to whatever modern day Fuhrer gets the power. They don’t believe in dictatorship per se; to paraphrase Matt Bai, they want dictatorship as long as it’s their side that lays down the rules or in their interest in the case of Webbon, his church or view of God that spells out the law. If Trump won and Kamala Harris refused to certify the election — something plenty of Republicans argued in 2020 was within Mike Pence’s power — Vance would spend the rest of his career whining about it. If the fascists got their dream dictatorship and wound up on the wrong side of their master (“You got your kid a measles shot. Don’t you know the Supreme Leader just declared vaccines the instruments of Satan?”) they’d be horrified the leopards ate their face. I doubt they’d ever feel bad about letting the leopards eat other people’s faces.

For the religious right, as I’ve mentioned before, there’s also a horror at the thought of people having the freedom to choose for themselves. Webbon’s convinced people are scum who must be kept in line by enlightened rulers like himself; otherwise they won’t live in what he considers a Christian way. Particularly women it seems: Webbon’s freely admitted he doesn’t allow his wife to read books without his permission. And dictates things like what time his four children go to the bathroom, “when we eat, what we eat, what we wear.”

And quite simply he, like Vance, likes the idea of whipping the lower orders into shape. Imposing order and discipline. Why waste time trying to evangelize or reason with people? Why set a Christian example by your loving behavior.

Which puts me in mind of a quote by Isaiah Berlin: “Men may be divided into those who are in favour of life and those who are against it. Among those who are against it there are sensitive and wise and penetrating people who are too offended and discouraged by the shapelessness of spontaneity, by the lack of order among human beings who wish to live their own lives, not in obedience to any common pattern”

I don’t think Vance or Webbon are at all sensitive, wise or penetrating. Otherwise, Berlin’s spot on.

1 Comment

Filed under Politics, Undead sexist cliches