Category Archives: Movies

An avenging angel, Captain Nemo and WW I: movies

The Count of Monte Cristo is a great yarn by Alexander Dumas, though I admit I couldn’t get into the unabridged edition. The 1934 film THE COUNT OF MONTE CRISTO (1934) stars Robert Donat as Edmund Dantes, condemned to life imprisonment by three schemers (one wants his lover Mercedes, one wants his promotion as ship captain, one has political reasons), sent to the inescapable Chateau d’If, and pronounced dead to ensure the bullshit charge will never come to trial.

Decades later, Dantes breaks out of prison, having received a world-class education from a fellow prisoner along with directions to a horde of treasure. Dantes uses the money to establish himself as a nobleman, then comes to France to arrange revenge on his three tormentors.

The movie takes considerable liberties with the book. I can understand giving Dantes a happy ending (Mercedes has never stopped loving him) but there’s a lot of emphasis on Dantes as an agent of justice rather than revenge — he’s not hunting these men down in retaliation but because of the crimes they’re committing against France. Was that some issue with the Production Code? A desire to keep him sympathetic? I’ve no clue. “I have followed your brilliant career with some interest.”

Not having seen the Jules Verne adaptation THE MYSTERIOUS ISLAND (1961) since I was a tween, I was disappointed to discover this Ray Harryhausen film has way less kaiju and a lot more Robinsonade material (i.e., desert-island survival a la Robinson Crusoe) than I remembered. A group of Civil War soldiers break out of a Confederate prison by balloon (accompanied by one Southerner—the film formula for a long time was that both sides were valiant and noble, the war was a bad mistake, nothing personal), get caught in a storm and wind up on a Pacific Island. Their struggle to survive is enlivened by occasional giant monsters, pirates, pretty women washing up on the beach and finally an encounter with Herbert Lom as Captain Nemo. This badly needs a stronger cast; Gary Merrill as a cynical war correspondent is good but he needs a strong, idealistic character to play against. Plus the Southerner’s accent is horrendous. “Considering the ships and crews you’ve sent to the bottom, you can’t disturb my conscience.”

It’s weird watching THE ROAD TO GLORY (1936) and realizing that just three years before WW II broke out, they were still making movies about the glory and tragedy of WW I. This Howard Hawks film is impressively dull, cobbled together from bits of The Dawn Patrol (the terrible burden of command in a doomed fight) —

—and Tiger Shark, with burnout commander Warner Baxter and womanizer Fredric March (in a surprisingly weak performance) in love with the same woman. As Films of Howard Hawk puts it, the film starts out with the insight that War is Hell and doesn’t add anything to it. John Barrymore plays Baxter’s father. “You know if one man fails, ten others may die with him.”

#SFWApro. All rights to images remain with current holders.

Leave a comment

Filed under Movies

A baby monster and Alfred Hitchcock: movies

Bill Warren, the expert on 1950s SF films, says GORGO (1961) came about because director Eugene Lourie saw how his daughter cried when The Beast From 20,000 Fathoms died at the end of its film. Kids sided with the monsters; why not make a film that does that too.

The film has two salvage captains capture the title kaijin by accident and put it on exhibit in London (“Gorgo — named for the gorgon, a creature so terrifying everyone who beheld it was petrified!”). Turns out the 30-foot high reptilian is only a baby of its kind — and Mommy is coming to recover her little boy.

This is a fun film that has extra punch for me because a monster demolishing London landmarks hooks me better than demolishing Tokyo or New York. The monsters are actors in rubber suits, but as Warren says, this film shows how that can work. “I expect the fantastic from scientists these days.”


Our last date movie was my BluRay of NORTH BY NORTHWEST (1960) in which ad man Cary Grant goes from a callow ladies man who needis his secretary to remind him which gift he sent his girlfriend to putting his life on the line to lead Eva Marie Saint across Mt. Rushmore before James Mason kills her — and that after being framed for murder, attacked by a crop-duster and getting fatally shot in a South Dakota restaurant. A favorite of mine that TYG liked too. With Jessie Royce Landis as Grant’s mom and Martin Landau as Mason’s right arm. “You’re not really going to kill my son, are you?”

#SFWApro. All rights to images remain with current holders.

1 Comment

Filed under Movies

Watching Turner Classic Movies in Greenville, SC

As TYG couldn’t attend the March Mensa gathering in Greenvile with me I spent time alone in my hotel room. That was fun—it’s not often I get to sit by myself free of pets—and it also led to me watching a lot of the Turner Classic channel when I was taking breaks from socializing (this is a repost from Atomic Junk Shop as last weekend’s con means I’m short of films to review).

I couldn’t resist tuning in, even knowing I wouldn’t be in the room long enough to finish anything. We don’t have cable at home — TYG cut the cord long before I moved up to join her in Durham — but back in Florida I loved TCM. Even though I have plenty of films available by streaming or my own DVDs, it was oddly cool to watch a film simply because it was on at that exact minute. Which is not to say the watching was always fun …

Case in point: I came in on the first film to find a family in a log cabin confronting a crisis. I had no idea what crisis at first but it turned out I’d tuned in The Yearling (1946) right before the boy protagonist has to shoot the injured deer he’s adopted as a pet. Aaaagh! I hate films and books where pet death, let alone killing your pet, becomes some kind of life lesson for children. But that’s the case here: at the end of the film, a relieved Gregory Peck tells his wife that their boy has grown — he’s no longer a yearling!

FATHER OF THE BRIDE (1950) was a lot more palatable, as witness I watched the whole thing after returning home. This stars Spencer Tracy and Joan Bennett as the parents who realize daughter Elizabeth Taylor is all grown up and in love; what follows is a low-key comedy of manners tackling such questions as whether Taylor’s in-laws will offend if they offer her parents a drink when they meet. Tracy shines as a guy struggling to adjust to the inconvenience of the wedding planning and to his shifting role in his daughter’s world. Some parts show their age — this was an era when marrying at 20 seemed perfectly normal — and Don Taylor as the bridegroom is too bland to match the rest of the cast.

Next up, 1936’s THE GREAT ZIEGFELD starring William Powell as the legendary showman and Broadway producer. I came in just as he’d resorted to some possibly illegal tricks to bring in a quartet of critics who think he’s lost his producing mojo. See any of his four current shows, he tells them, and they’ll change their minds.

After they leave Flo tells a friend it doesn’t matter what they think: he’s invested all his money in stocks bought on margin! When he cashes in, he’ll be so rich he’ll be on easy street! Why yes, the Black Friday crash of 1929 ruins him and he dies broken and penniless, little realizing how much joy his shows have brought to thousands. I might watch all of this sometimes, if only to see 1920s comedienne Fanny Brice (I’ve listened to some of Brice’s “Baby Snooks” radio routines and they’re hilarious).

After that I couldn’t bring myself to rewatch the 1931 tearjerker THE CHAMP with Wallace Beery as a drunken boxer struggling to take care of his kid. In case you’re wondering, this was 31 Days of Oscar month from TCM so naturally that includes a lot of tearjerking, tragedy and death.

Trying to find an alternative to The Champ reminded me not being bound by network schedules has its upside. While I knew the networks were no longer airing cartoons on Saturday morning, I didn’t realize it’s all news — specifically chatter about the Oscars. When I tried Cartoon Network, the channel glitched; SyFy was airing an infomercial.

CIMARRON (1931) did something none of the others did, push me to go online to read TCM’s schedule. I came in on a scene set apparently in an antebellum residence (judging by the faithful black servants) so I assumed it was some drama about the wonderful, nostalgic days of the old South when white men were men and the sheep were nervous. Nope, it turned out the home was just a launching pad for Richard Dix and Irene Dunne to head out west and homestead, accompanied by a goofy black kid servant providing not-aged-well comic relief.

All I knew about Cimarron before catching the piece of it that I did was that it was by Edna Ferber who also wrote Showboat (the online synopsis indicates it has some of the same marital tropes). Oh, and film historian Peter Stanfield cites it as the kind of serious Western like Stagecoach that critics love but did less box office and hit theaters much less frequently than the oft-disdained singing cowboy films of Gene Autry and Roy Rogers.

In any case, I won’t be catching the rest of it. I’m not much of a Western fan and Dix’ Southern accent falls into what for me is the nails-on-a-chalkboard range.

Overall the weekend didn’t leave me missing TCM as much as I’d have expected. But it was still fun.

#SFWApro. All rights to images remain with current holders.

Leave a comment

Filed under Movies, TV

Bayard Rustin and M. Night Shyamalan: movies viewed

Some spoilers for Glass below.

Washington Post columnist Jennifer Rubin mentioned that alongside Netflix’s biopic on civil rights activist Bayard Rustin the service was also streaming the 2003 documentary BROTHER OUTSIDER: The Life of Bayard Rustin. As I prefer documentaries to biopics, here we go: Rustin, whom I knew of but not about, was a teenage golden boy (charming, handsome and a great singing voice) who grew into a gay black activist and pacifist, friend with prominent civil-rights leaders such as Martin Luther King and A. Philip Randolph and ended up in the awkward position of supporting the Vietnam War (in the belief he could do more good allied with the Johnson White House than opposed — or because he was swayed by getting close to power. Opinions differ). His homosexuality, of course, further complicated everything, leading King to cut him off for fear of the backlash from their association. Very good. “That was the first occasion on which I knew Westchester had three police cars.”

SPLIT (2016) wasM. Night Shyamalan’s sequel to Unbreakable in which the more deranged of James Macavoy’s multiple personalities kidnap three young women as sacrifices to the monstrous persona the Beast while his psychiatrist tries persuading other personalities that the superhuman Beast can’t be real, right? Macavoy does a great turn but the treatment of the women felt uncomfortably misogynistic, not to mention the Final Girl ending up back in her abusive uncle’s care (something resolved in the third movie but that doesn’t excuse it). And I’m heartily tired of abuse as an origin story. “Is this the ultimate doorway to all things unknown?”

Part three came in the form of GLASS (2019) wherein Bruce Willis’ “Overseer” (“At least they’ve stopped calling you the Tip-Toe Man.”) rescues another trio of young girl’s from The Beast but that only leads to MacAvoy and Willis getting incarcerated with Mr. Glass (Samuel L. Jackson) under the care of shrink Sarah Paulson, who’s determined to cure their delusion they possess powers and abilities beyond those of ordinary mortals. Glass, however, is not as helpless as he appears, and he has a plan …

It turns out that Paulson’s character works for a cabal that watches for and eliminates metahumans, believing they’ll inevitably disrupt the established order. Glass, however, knows about them; while the cabal eliminates the trio of metas Glass has arranged to have their battle streamed to the Internet. In his narration he tells viewers that what’s holding us back from becoming superhuman is that we don’t believe a man can fly (so to speak); now that we’ve seen we should trust those feelings that tell us we’re amazing, and act on them.

I found the film watchable but frustrating, as witness my mixed reaction to the ending. On the one hand, it’s hard to believe anything we see online is going to game-change anything — who’s going to buy it rather than think it’s special effects? Then again, people believe all kinds of ridiculous stuff; if belief unlocks meta-powers, it could very well work. Overall, I think the finish would have worked better if we’d seen more signs of people manifesting powers or learned more about the cabal (are they genuinely well-meaning or simply shielding their status and power from disruption?). “Everything extraordinary can be explained away — and yet it’s true.”

#SFWApro. All rights to images remain with current holders.

Leave a comment

Filed under Movies

Truffaut, Hawks and Spencer Tracy: movies viewed

The follow-up to Francois Truffaut’s Stolen Kisses, BED AND BOARD (1970) has Antoine Doinel (Jean-Pierre Leaud) young, happy, in love with Claude Jade (one of the love interests from the previous film) and with everything to live for, even before his wife pops out a baby. Inevitably that doesn’t last as Antoine becomes entangled with Japanese businessman’s sexually aggressive wife. A good, quirky film that again ends with Antoine in a better place than I expected.“If I commit suicide with someone, I’d like it to be you.”

Howard Hawks’ BARBARY COAST (1935) has Miriam Hopkins arrive in Gold Rush-era San Francisco to marry rich only to learn her fiancee died after losing his money to Edward Robinson’s gambling hell. Not to worry, Robinson’s quite willing to assume her fiancee’s duties — and while Hopkins nixes that, she agrees to be a shill, looking sexy as she spins the rigged roulette wheel to separate miners from their gold.

The fatal flaw in this dull costume drama is that all the characters turn soft for no reason. Hopkins, initially mercenary, turns out to be a good girl even before she falls for intellectual miner Joel McCrea. A supporting low-life turns out to have a heart of gold that keeps him helping McCrea out. Robinson at the end becomes as ludicrously self-sacrificing as the female pirate in Anne of the Indies. “I love the fine names men give themselves to hide their greed and their love of adventure.”

Rewatching FATHER OF THE BRIDE (1950) confirms my feeling its much less about the wedding bills than the Steve Martin remake and more about Spencer Tracy’s bemusement as he deals with his daughter growing up, remodeling the house for the wedding, wife Joan Bennett wanting Liz Taylor to have the fantasy wedding she never did and Taylor discovering her husband wants to go fishing on their honeymoon. Very much a product of its time but mostly not in a bad way, though the faithful black servant and Taylor marrying at 20 have aged poorly. Given TYG started planning our wedding a year out, I’m curious if three months planning for a comparably large church wedding would have been the norm back then or a hand-wave to make the timeline work better for the story. “I took the precaution of wearing belt and suspenders.”

#SFWApro. All rights to images remain with current holders.

Leave a comment

Filed under Movies

Farewell to the Doctors — well, the first six of them

Yep, I’ve finally completed my rewatch of classic Doctor Who. They finished off with an excellent S26, though the final serial was sub-par.Battlefield brings back the Brigadier out of retirement (and introduces to Doris, his sometimes mentioned but never previously appearing lady friend, now wife) when UNIT’s transport of nuclear weapons runs afoul of armored knights in the service of Morgan leFay (Jean Marsh). The Doctor and Ace’s services are required but things get more complicated when it turns out the Doctor was, or will be, Merlin.

UNIT here are much more of an international operation than they’d been portrayed in the past, something I wish the revival series had kept up. That Morgan’s forces are from another dimension puzzled me — why not use regular historical/mythic Arthurian characters? — but screenwriter Ben Aaronovitch had conceived them as more tech-oriented than the were in the finished version. Still a lot of fun with a great twist on one point of Arthurian legend. “Go, before I bring down … something … upon you!”

Ghost Light has the Doctor and Ace arrive at a strange house in the 19th century that Ace discovers has a strong relevance to her future in Perrivale. All kinds of weirdness are going on, including ape-men serving as butlers, an alien in the cellar and a scheme to assassinate Queen Victoria. It doesn’t entirely hold together but it’s engaging enough even so. “I hate bus stations — all the lost luggage, all the lost souls.”

The Curse of Fenric (as the villain is clearly inspired by the myth of Fenris, I’m baffled why they didn’t use that) has the Doctor and Ace arrive at a British codebreaking station in WW II. There are Russians, hints of an ancient evil, yet another revelation about Ace and Fenric trapped by  the Doctor long ago but ready to break out. There are also the haemovores, vampires from the end of Earth — creatures of a despairing world, they’re repelled by faith in anything.

This was an excellent one though one scientist modeled on Alan Turing comes off too much the disability cliche (being in a wheelchair as a substitute for Turing’s homosexuality). “I hate bus stations — all that lost luggage, all those lost souls.”

The disappointing finish was Survival, in which the Doctor and Ace visit her boring home village of Perrivale. Only it’s not so boring because dimension-hopping Cheetah-people are attacking and kidnapping people for the hunt, the Master is trapped on their world and their world is about to explode … The Cheetah people never looked right to me, nor do I see why one of the fastest land animals would hunt from horseback. A bigger problem is that none this adds up to a coherent episode and it’s not as interesting in its incoherence as Ghost Light. Still, the final monologue adds a lot. “Somewhere the tea is getting cold.”

What next? I’m keen to catch all the “lost” serials now out on DVD or streaming. I’m debating whether I’d sooner rewatch the early years and then include them in sequence or go straight to the lost stuff. I won’t be doing either right away, so no hurry.

For bonus imagery, here’s the shirt my sister got me for my birthday. It’s like she knows me or something.

#SFWApro. All rights to images remain with current holder.

Leave a comment

Filed under TV

Double features in different media

LOGAN’S RUN by William F. Nolan and George Clayton Johnson spun off a movie, a TV series, a comic book and several sequels, which is surprising now that I’ve read it. It’s very much a product of the late 1960s, one of the “youthquake” stories like Prez, Wild in the Streets and Gas that assume the Kids Take Over for better (Prez) or worse (the rest). In this case, as we learn late in the books, Youth rebels against the government’s zero population growth efforts, overthrows the oldsters and adopts a new approach: a computer-run society where kids start training at 7, assume adult roles at 14 and get put to sleep at 21. For those who snap and run from the latter fate, the Sandmen step in, hunt them down, and finish them off.

When the Sandman Logan discovers his time is running out he decides to make a final heroic gesture, turning Runner to discover the location of Sanctuary, a possibly mythical refuge where Runners can live beyond 21. Along with the beautiful Jessica he begins to work his way through the globe-spanning underground network leading to Sanctuary but it’s a long and dangerous road ahead …

I’m not sure this makes sense. Nobody really comes off as a kid and even with the computer running things society seems to work too well. However it’s so well done, so action packed, it’s a great read anyway.The 1976 LOGAN’S RUN movie was a favorite of mine when it came out. Two likable actors (Jenny Agutter and Michael York) in the leads, a bizarre future environment and good visuals (though as Camestros Felapton says, it looks less impressive post-Star Wars). However reading the book makes me appreciate it has a lot less logic behind it. In the film’s setting you live until you’re 30. Then comes the chance of restored life or death in the ritual of carousel. No explanation how it all came about. And where the book’s dangerous settings — the animalistic teenage Cubs, the cyborg Box — all made sense, here they have no more substance than a D&D random-roll monster.  I still enjoyed it but the book is way better. “Each cat has three different names.”

Our friend Hope Alexander (a retired actor whose mother Mara was an actor in The Rains Came), recently appeared in a stage production of Agatha Christie’s MURDER ON THE ORIENT EXPRESS so that became one of TYG’s and my date nights. Hope was great and the rest of the cast were good (though the various accents — Scots, English, Belgian, French, Swedish) but the story reminded me why I’ve never cottoned to Christie. First we meet Hercule Poirot, then we meet the various players, one after another. Then comes the murder (by stopping the train in a snowstorm we get a glamorous setting — the Orient Express was very cool back in the day — but also the isolated locale with a limited band of casts) and then interviews with the cast one after the other, then the awkward scene where Poirot slowly explains what happens. At times the script felt like it was on the brink of tragedy. Below, a rocking horse symbolizing a child’s murder that’s a key part of the backstory. “As they say in the Bible, if Moses can’t give you the answer, find a concierge.”

As I remembered loving 1974’s MURDER ON THE ORIENT EXPRESS I rewatched it to figure out why it worked better. While it has a stunning cast — Albert Finney as Poirot supported by Lauren Bacall, Wendy Hiller, Martin Balsam, Antony Perkins, Richard Widmark, Jacqueline Bissett, Michael York, Sean Connery, Vanessa Redgrave and John Gielgud — I think the difference is that director Sidney Lumet makes full use of the camera’s power. When the cast enters they’re framed against a seemingly real train and mixed in with other people boarding or crossing the station; Lumet breaks up the rote action enough to keep it engaging. Not as much as first viewing — if you know the twist it doesn’t rewatch as well — but enough to make rewatching it worthwhile. “An Englishwoman who had never lived in America would have said ‘I can put in a trunk call to my solicitors.’”

#SFWApro.  All rights to images remain with current holders.

2 Comments

Filed under Movies, Reading

Jekyll and Hyde: That Henry Jekyll is one mean mother—

As part of my proposal to McFarland for a Jekyll and Hyde movie book, I’m giving them a sample chapter looking at the 1932 Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. As I wrote last year, the part of the film where Hyde (Fredric March) abuses and gaslights Ivy (Miriam Hopkins) is not only horrifying to watch but makes Jekyll much less sympathetic.Hyde, after all, is Jekyll’s way of acting out his more sinful desires without getting caught. He’s sexually frustrated not being able to sleep with his fiancee Muriel (Rose Hobart) but he doesn’t want to risk the scandal of taking a lover. By becoming Hyde he’s free, but he also free other impulses too. Hyde like hurting people with little provocation; he’s Jekyll’s lizard brain, his id, completely stripped off inhibitions. As the film progresses, Hyde’s apish form becomes more bestial; so it seems is his conduct.

This is in keeping with the Victorian view that criminal, violent behavior represented a lower level of evolution than the middle and upper class Victorian white men; a career criminal was an evolutionary throwback to the level of an African savage (blacks are not, of course, a lower evolutionary level, nor are they more brutal or criminal than white people). In mutated form, the idea that our rationality is at war with our more animalistic side is still around. The point in the film is not that Jekyll’s a monster but that we’ve all got the capacity for evil and inhumanity; when Hyde is Jekyll those impulses are in check. Rose is not at risk.

Rewatching the film, I don’t think that absolves Jekyll. The film wants us to have sympathy for him: Mamoulian cut one scene from the script, showing Jekyll paying off the father of a girl Hyde trampled on, because it makes him look bad. Maybe he wouldn’t ever do that as himself but he’s not too troubled by having done it as Hyde. The same is true of the abuse: he’s willing to keep turning into Hyde so he can have sex with Ivy, even though he knows what Hyde’s doing to her. The movie avoids making Jekyll look like a villain because we don’t see him from his first seduction of Ivy through the moment Muriel, absent with her father, returns to town. When Ivy come to him shortly afterwards, he’s troubled by her suffering but he obviously wasn’t troubled enough to stop as long as he needed a sexual outlet. I wondered if maybe he’d stayed Hyde but Poole (Edgar Norton), his butler, references seeing his master occasionally so Jekyll did change back and forth.

I don’t think there’s any way not to see Jekyll as a villain rather than a tragic figure, though even if unintended, thgat fits with the shallow hypocrite of Stevenson’s novel.

The movie’s critique of Victorian stuffiness and hypocrisy is also off. Jekyll’s friend Lanyon (Holmes Herbert) is a stuffy conformist who doesn’t approve of Jekyll spending so much time on charity work and doesn’t see any need for science to advance the human condition. At the end, he comes off as the voice of reason: Jekyll’s non-conformity, his pushing back against the era’s mores, his reluctance to rein in his passions, are flaws; there’s no distinction between the good side (his impassioned desire for Rose) and the evil side that manifests in Hyde. Like so many other mad scientists, Jekyll’s positive aspects (by today’s standards) are tinged with folly because they led to him, as he says at one point, trespassing in God’s domain.

#SFWApro. All rights to images remain with current holders.

5 Comments

Filed under Movies, Nonfiction, Writing

A wild party in the house that dripped blood! Movies viewed

Several years before Merchant Ivory became big with films such as Howard’s End and Room With a View, they made the less successful THE WILD PARTY (1975). James Coco plays a fading comedy star (baased on Fatty Arbuckle, I believe) whose party will double as a screening for his new film which he hopes will turn his life around. In the meantime he’s increasingly abusive to his mistress (Raquel Welch) even as she struggles to be supportive.

I’ve been curious about this one for a while but it lost my interest almost immediately. The cast, which includes Perry King, Royal Dano and David Dukes, is good but there’s something heavy-handed about the execution that I didn’t see in later Merchant-Ivory works (whether it’s the Americanness of this one or that it’s an early work, I don’t know). As a result I lost interest fast; The Cat’s Meow worked much better in a similar vein.

Howard Hawks’ TWENTIETH CENTURY (1934) stars John Barrymore and Carole Lombard in a screwball comedy where Boy Director Gets Girl Actor, Boy Director Loses Girl Actor to Hollywood and Boy Director then moves heaven and hell to get back as he can’t seem to score a hit without her. This feels very much like a dry run for the Cary Grant/Rosalind Russell relationship in Hawks’ His Girl Friday, which was also written by Ben Hecht but as Films of Howard Hawks says, it’s not as balanced: this is a Barrymore star vehicle and while he’s hysterically funny, Lombard’s role isn’t written to match him (nor does he have Grant’s charm) which makes her too much the victim (and her boyfriend is a complete cipher). Thumbs down.“There’s a law in this country about riding on trains and I’m calling on you to invoke it.”

JUDAS AND THE BLACK MESSIAH (2021) is the grim story of how the FBI gave one petty black crook the choice to either spend time in prison or joining Fred Hampton’s Black Panther chapter, giving them intel to take Hampton down and ultimately helping them assassinate him. Well done, although as I’m familiar with Hampton’s story and they’re sticking close to the facts there’s nothing terribly revelatory here (the big surprises were that Hampton was only 21 when they killed him and that the informant committed suicide the night after PBS aired an interview with him). “You don’t have to understand, Bill — you just have to draw me a blueprint.”When I moved up here TYG bought me a copy of the Amicus horror film THE HOUSE THAT DRIPPED BLOOD (1971) and proceeded to freak out about the 1970s fashion. That made it irresistible when Carolina Theatre aired it on the big screen last weekend. Investigating the disappearance of horror star Jon Pertwee, a Scotland Yard man learns it’s only the latest several bizarre deaths in the house, from Denholm Elliott being attacked by his fictional creation to Peter Cushing and Joss Ackland losing their heads over a wax figure of Salome to Christopher Lee worrying his daughter is the child of Satan. Not the best of Amicus’ output but fun. “Then I wouldn’t suggest that you spend time in that house alone.”

#SFWApro.  All rights to images remain with current holder.

1 Comment

Filed under Movies

The Tick is Manifest: recent TV viewing

(Some spoilers for Manifest).

When MANIFEST launched in 2018 it looked promising. Five years after Flight 828 vanished on its return from the Caribbean, it arrives in New York with nobody on board aware how long they’ve been gone. What happened? Why do they have these mysterious impulses that steer them to help people in need? While the cast was good, the show lost me as it went through the next two seasons (as I discussed in my review of S2). Apparently I wasn’t alone as NBC axed the show after S3. Netflix picked it up and I slowly worked my way through the final season.

Certainly I can’t fault their ambition. Having established in S3 that flight 828 is somehow connected with Noah’s ark, they go full-on cosmic/religious in S4: the passengers time is running out and when they die it will bring on an apocalypse. The murderous Angelina (Holly Taylor) believes she’s been chosen as a messiah who will save a small, elect crew; others hope that working together they can save the world entire. Volcanoes erupt under New York. In the final episode one of them coughs up the supposedly destroyed plane the passengers vanished on, everyone boards and while some (most notably Angelina) die, the rest survive to land … five years earlier, exactly when they were supposed to. God has tested them and now they get their lives back as a reward for …. well, I’ve no idea. As with Doonby, I have no idea why God’s supposed to have done this shit; the ending narration specifically says they’ll never understand it themselves. I could rationalize something if I cared but I don’t care that much. “There is no point trying to stop a volcano if the divine doesn’t want it stopped.” My friend Ross sent me the second season of THE TICK a while back but I only just finished it up. If anything, loonier than the first season, a complete loonie fest in which the Tick battles alongside Leonardo da Vinci, faces the world’s comfiest chair, deals with supervillain family dynamics and helps save Christmas. As with S1 this set misses one episode and S3 is nowhere to be found. But I’m grateful for what I do have because this is some gloriously funny stuff. “He’s acknowledged the decoration committee — and now he’s thanking his parents!”

#SFWApro. All rights to images remain with current holders.

Leave a comment

Filed under Movies, TV