So let’s say a young woman hooks up and regrets it. Bad judgment. Creepy guy. Unsatisfying sex. Guy didn’t even try to make her come. Whatever. The morning-after reaction, I imagine, might be disappointment, kicking yourself, wishing you hadn’t done it. But according to rape apologists, I’m wrong: the woman’s natural reaction is to call police or campus authorities and claim you were raped!
This is a popular apologist rationalization for why so many women report rape: it’s not that a lot of guys like to rape, it’s that the accuser is suffering “buyer’s remorse.” She feels bad, so she’s going to make him pay. Some examples:
- “Accusaitions — 90 percent of them — fall into the category of ‘we were both drunk,’ ‘we broke up, and six months later I found myself under a Title IX investigation because she just decided that our last sleeping together was not quite right,’” according to Education Department official Candice Jackson. Her odious boss, Betsy DeVos has claimed she doesn’t know if true reports outnumber false reports of rape. Both women subsequently walked it back.
- Right-wing pundit Mona Charen claimed in a column some years ago, that date rape is the result of feminists brainwashing young women into thinking sex without commitment is good. When they wake up the next morning and realize they’re now sluts, the women go into denial and delude themselves it was rape. She repeated the argument in her book Sex Matters, claiming that because of feminist political correctness, women can’t admit they don’t want sex or didn’t like the sex, so the only way they can express their revulsion is to cry rape.
- “Some men are jerks and will treat you like garbage after sex. However ‘buyer’s remorse’ is not rape” according to the Chaste Courtship website.
- Back when Colorado Rep. Ken Buck was just a DA, he told a rape victim that he wasn’t going to prosecute her case, because a jury would just write it off as “buyer’s remorse.” (he subsequently said the remark was taken out of context)
- Caitlin Flanagan (of the antifeminist double-standard) says, like Charen, that women have no sense of sexual regret so they can no longer admit “I sure wish I hadn’t done that … I’m embarrassed … I had hopes that it would be more romantic. I had hopes that it would be the beginning of something. I had hopes that afterward, by the time I got home, there would be three texts on my phone.”
It’s really bizarre that anyone making this claim thinks they’re describing commonplace reality. That if someone really, really wishes they hadn’t had sex they wouldn’t simply replay the night and kick themselves, or vent to their friends (Charen claims PC simply won’t let women say stuff like that. She needs to hang out with more women). No, they’d call the authorities and accuse the guy of rape. Despite the shitstorm that could descend upon his head. Despite the shit that could descend on their own, because I think most women have a good idea that rape victim is not the “coveted status” rape apologist George Will claims it is.
And if they were going to lie, why not make up a better story? Will, for example, describes a woman telling an occasional lover no; he kept going so she just laid back and waited for it to be over. The no makes it pretty clear-cut she was assaulted, but to Will it’s not sexual assault but “sexual assault.” And he’s not alone; lots of men and women think the same. So if the woman’s going to lie, why wouldn’t she cook up a better story instead of one Will can write off as an “ambiguous” hookup?
It’s not that women don’t sometimes wake up wishing they hadn’t hooked up; Rebecca Traister argues that it happens frequently because even consensual sex is often unsatisfying (“Male climax remains the accepted finish of hetero encounters; a woman’s orgasm is still the elusive, optional bonus round.”). And that women on campus are pressured to show they’re sex-positive. But that’s a far cry from calling it rape. And unlike Charen and other right-wingers, Traister’s under no illusion the solution is going back to old courtship roles (“Having humiliating sex with a man who treats you terribly at a frat party is bad but not inherently worse than being publicly shunned for having had sex with him, or being unable to obtain an abortion after getting pregnant by him, or being doomed to have disappointing sex with him for the next 50 years.”).
But for misogynists, imagining crying rape is women’s way of dealing with bad sex makes it easier not to deal with the ugliness of rape culture.
Pingback: Harvey Weinstein’s lawyer says his victims are the ones at fault. | Fraser Sherman's Blog
Pingback: An anthology blows up and other links about books, movies, recipes and reporting | Fraser Sherman's Blog
Pingback: Undead Sexist of the Day: Warren Farrell | Fraser Sherman's Blog
Pingback: Undead Sexist of the Day: Matt Walsh | Fraser Sherman's Blog
Pingback: Undead Sexist Cliches: I’m using logic, therefore feminists are wrong | Fraser Sherman's Blog
Pingback: Lack of empathy, lack of logic: Warren Farrell’s “The Myth of Male Power” | Fraser Sherman's Blog
Pingback: The misogynist lies Republicans tell themselves (and us) | Fraser Sherman's Blog
Pingback: J.D. Vance: if you don’t want a dictatorship, that shows you’re biased! | Fraser Sherman's Blog
Pingback: Interracial marriage is bad, 25 percent of Republicans say | Fraser Sherman's Blog
Pingback: Suddenly abortion’s not about “states’ rights” | Fraser Sherman's Blog
Pingback: Embracing misogyny stunts you and makes you stupider. | Fraser Sherman's Blog
Pingback: Undead Sexist Cliches: If You Don’t Want To Get Pregnant Don’t Have Sex | Fraser Sherman's Blog
Pingback: The most merciful thing | Fraser Sherman's Blog
This is a common theme in prison-settings: i.e. prisoners will have voluntary same-sex relations with other prisoners; and then universally claim “rape” in order to deny homosexual allegations.
They will not file rape-charges, or sue the prison; but will simply maintain informally that they were “gang-raped” to deny any question of their manhood, since obviously they were forced and outnumbered.
Of course, women don’t have that option, against men; since rape is considered a serious crime, but is rumored to be “a normal part of prison life;” so the women want to place all responsibility on the man, by denying their own part in it, and having the men publicly crucified for it.
It doesn’t bother them at all, that they are committing a serious felony themselves against innocent persons; because feminism has told them that they were RAPED!
The “#MeToo movement, and “All Women Deserve To Be Believed” etc, imply that men are automatically guilty, ala “To Kill a Mockingbird.”
As noted in the OP, the idea women run around screaming rape after consensual sex is bullshit. There’s no reason to think so other than the desperate need some people have to pretend rape isn’t as common as it is.
And yes, all women deserve to be believed just as much as most crime victims: not that men should automatically be jailed but rape should be investigated instead of blown off, as frequently happens.