“white grievance, no matter how ill-founded, can never be humiliating or disqualifying.”

That’s one of the stronger quotes from Ta-Nehisi Coates’ piece on Clinton’s statement half of Trump’s supporters were motivated by bigotry, half by economic desperation. As he points out, multiple pundits have reacted in shock to Clinton’s suggestion — not shock that it’s true (which statistics bear out) or that we have that mass of bigots in our country to deal with, but that she’d say something so awful. Never mind whether it’s true she’s not supposed to say it! She’s a bigot for criticizing white voters!

This isn’t that unusual. Squealing with outrage about the slightest criticism and comparing it to censorship is what conservatives have been doing since at least Clinton got into office. Insisting that as they’re not saying anything about race (or religion or gender) they’re the ones who are free of bigotry (of course they talk a lot about race, religion and gender and how all the wrong ones are inferior). And they often get away with it because where black resentment is horrifying, white resentment is normal. Imagine if, like Sarah Palin’s husband, Michelle Obama had been part of a secessionist movement. Or if Ted Cruz’s father were black (instead of conservative Christian) and making statements about how his people need dominion over every part of American life.

As Coates says, “White racial grievance enjoys automatic credibility, and even when disproven, it is never disqualifying of its bearers. It is very difficult to imagine, for instance, a 9/11 truther, who happened to be black, becoming even a governor. And yet we live in an era in which the country’s leading birther might well be president. This fact certainly horrifies some of the same journalists who attacked Clinton this weekend. But what they have yet to come to grips with is that Donald Trump is a democratic phenomenon, and that there are actual people—not trolls under a bridge—whom he, and his prejudices against Latinos, Muslims, and blacks, represent.”


Filed under Politics

6 responses to ““white grievance, no matter how ill-founded, can never be humiliating or disqualifying.”

  1. Pingback: Reporting on Trump | Fraser Sherman's Blog

  2. Pingback: Nice guys in white sheets (or out of them) | Fraser Sherman's Blog

  3. Pingback: White achievement, like white grievance, is always legitimate | Fraser Sherman's Blog

  4. Pingback: Civility and moderation | Fraser Sherman's Blog

  5. Pingback: A newspaper op-ed that doesn’t understand journalism? | Fraser Sherman's Blog

  6. Pingback: So now we’re supposed to heal our broken nation and achieve unity … | Fraser Sherman's Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.