Diversity, plus links about labor and economics

Chick-Fil-A has been the right wing’s favorite restaurant for ages (at least on paper — I wouldn’t bet they patronize it as much as they write about it) until recently it became too woke for conservatives. The issue? They have a diversity, equity and inclusiveness vice president at the company. For a lot of conservatives, as noted at the second link, thinking about diversity means choosing less qualified POC or women over more qualified white people and that’s racist!

Ron DeSantis, who’s making I Hate Diversity his brand, says if he were president, federal civil rights investigations will include fighting diversity, including in the military, where diversity truly horrifies right wingers. As I’ve said before, letting people of all races, genders, and orientations enlist isn’t woke, but for people who fantasize about the ability to fight as the ultimate test of manhood (never mind whether they do or not), it’s agonizing.

As I’ve mentioned before (here and here) there was never a time when jobs were handed out without race and gender being an influence. It’s just that a century ago the bias was in favor of white men; I guarantee you, nobody pretending they want a meritocracy would be demanding one if they were thrown back a hundred years. Nor do they care about legacy admissions and other bias factors that disproportionately benefit upper-class white people.

Despite the squealing about how we should be color/gender blind, it takes a conscious effort to overcome bias. For example, orchestras hire more women musicians if they don’t know their gender (auditioning unseen behind a screen). One study that sent out near-identical resumes with different photos attached found a white man with a felony was more likely to get a job interview than a black man with the same resume but no rap sheet. Other studies have found people are biased in favor of natural talent over hard work. That isn’t the same sort of discrimination but does show how our unbiased assessments are anything but.

Overcoming that sort of bias takes conscious effort. Right-wingers don’t want business making that effort because it doesn’t benefit white dudes, end of story.

In other economic news:

Did a consultant contribute to the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank?

Another day, another crypto firm shows cracks.

“It’s like being on vacation all the time, with occasional scrambling to do a thing, then doing the thing for a couple of hours, then going back to the rest of my life,”— says one of the “jobless employed.”

“The real problem here is that a more rational work culture would include the recognition that it’s OK to get paid full time wages for doing ten or fifteen hours of work a week, since that’s what everybody should be doing at this point, given how rich we’ve become as a society. But we can’t have that because any such recognition would dampen economic growth and profit maximization, which is obviously a terrible thing because [step in argument missing].” — LGM responding to the previous link.

Labor protests in the newspaper business.

The National Eating Disorder Association’s staff made the decision to unionize. So NEDA’s replacing human hotline staffers with chatbots.

“Johnson & Johnson said on Tuesday that it had agreed to pay $8.9 billion to tens of thousands of people who claimed the company’s talcum powder products caused cancer

LGM dissects and mocks a really bad argument for why workers should return to the office.

For workers whose jobs require showing up in person, the economy isn’t improving.

The right-wing war against diversity in business.

The impact of COVID-quitting on one county (this is from 2021, but it’s interesting).

2 Comments

Filed under economics, Politics

2 responses to “Diversity, plus links about labor and economics

  1. Pingback: Let’s sneer at Republicans! | Fraser Sherman's Blog

  2. Pingback: Bad, bad ideas | Fraser Sherman's Blog

Leave a Reply